03.01.2014 Views

sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC

sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC

sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Households <strong>and</strong> Services<br />

Ancilliary Costs <strong>and</strong> Benefits <strong>of</strong> Mitigation Options in the<br />

Households <strong>and</strong> Tertiary Sectors<br />

Gina Roos<br />

Summary<br />

Preliminary results <strong>of</strong> the South African Emissions Inventory for 1990 (van der Merwe <strong>and</strong><br />

Scholes, 1999) estimate that approximately 374 million tons <strong>of</strong> CO 2 equivalents were emitted.<br />

Under the <strong>IPCC</strong> methodology, the total energy sector contributed 89% <strong>of</strong> the total CO 2<br />

equivalent emissions. Of the energy dem<strong>and</strong>ed in 1996, the residential <strong>and</strong> commerce <strong>and</strong><br />

services contributed 14%. Energy efficiency <strong>and</strong> fuel switching options in these sectors could<br />

lead to an emissions reduction <strong>of</strong> somewhat less than 550 million tons <strong>of</strong> CO 2 equivalents over<br />

the next 30 years. Considering direct life cycle <strong>costs</strong>, a large amount <strong>of</strong> these savings can be<br />

achieved at a negative cost. However, substantial barriers due exist in terms <strong>of</strong> high capital <strong>costs</strong>,<br />

lack <strong>of</strong> awareness <strong>and</strong> technological support. Indirect <strong>costs</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>benefits</strong> were only considered<br />

qualitatively. This poses serious problems for the decision-maker. If a <strong>mitigation</strong> option is<br />

selected primarily on the basis <strong>of</strong> its’ cost-effectiveness, a less than optimal solution will be<br />

achieved, as ancillary <strong>costs</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>benefits</strong> can be significant. It is essential that consistent<br />

methodologies <strong>and</strong> experienced practitioners be applied to this problem. An additional problem<br />

for policy makers is the unanticipated impacts that can arise. When trying to address one<br />

problem, new problems could be created. This points to the need for good data, <strong>of</strong>ten lacking for<br />

developing countries. Finally, indirect <strong>costs</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>benefits</strong> as well as unanticipated impacts will<br />

vary depending on country specific situations.<br />

Background<br />

Emissions<br />

Shackleton et al., (1996) estimated South Africa’s carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emissions in 1992 at<br />

between 236 <strong>and</strong> 399 million tons per annum. These figures are supported by preliminary results<br />

<strong>of</strong> the South African Emissions Inventory for 1990 (van der Merwe <strong>and</strong> Scholes, 1999), where it<br />

was estimated that approximately 374 million tons <strong>of</strong> CO 2 equivalents were emitted. Direct CO 2<br />

emissions contributed 81.5% to this, methane (CH 4 ) emissions 12.5% <strong>and</strong> nitrous oxide (N 2 O)<br />

emissions 6.5%. Under the <strong>IPCC</strong> methodology, the total energy sector contributed 89% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

total CO 2 equivalent emissions. Of the energy dem<strong>and</strong>ed in 1996, industry was responsible for<br />

62%, transport 21%, residential 10%, commerce <strong>and</strong> services 4% <strong>and</strong> agriculture 3% (SANEA,<br />

1998).<br />

Energy Dem<strong>and</strong> in the Residential Sector<br />

SANEA (1998) reports that final energy consumed in this sector during 1996 was split between<br />

electricity (42%), biomass <strong>and</strong> renewables (24%), coal (21%), liquid fuels (10%) <strong>and</strong> gas (3%).<br />

Further, consumption patterns vary tremendously across household types, where township<br />

houses, established farms <strong>and</strong> suburban houses rely more on electricity (from 45 – 75% <strong>of</strong> their<br />

energy requirements) while informal settlements <strong>and</strong> poorer rural settlements rely on a mixture <strong>of</strong><br />

low pressure gas, paraffin, coal <strong>and</strong> wood. In 1996, 55% <strong>of</strong> houses had electricity <strong>and</strong> the<br />

electrification programme is continuing (grid <strong>and</strong> non-grid). Significant problems for nonelectrified<br />

households have been identified (SANEA, 1998) as security <strong>of</strong> fuelwood supplies,<br />

fuel <strong>costs</strong> <strong>and</strong> health <strong>and</strong> safety issues.<br />

254

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!