03.01.2014 Views

sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC

sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC

sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Seth Dunn <strong>and</strong> Michael Renner<br />

Policymakers will need to be attentive to the transition <strong>costs</strong> <strong>of</strong> climate <strong>mitigation</strong> measures. The<br />

British experience provides some indication <strong>of</strong> the danger <strong>of</strong> social disruption. In the mid-1980s,<br />

the British government restructured the coal industry, closing large numbers <strong>of</strong> mines <strong>and</strong><br />

slashing coal subsidies - though motivated more by the intent to break the power <strong>of</strong> labor unions<br />

than by the desire to avert climate change. While this policy did reduce carbon emissions, it also<br />

caused high unemployment <strong>and</strong> unleashed an array <strong>of</strong> associated social ills in coal mining<br />

regions, not least because the bitterly disputed policy was forced through in a short stretch <strong>of</strong><br />

time.<br />

If individuals <strong>and</strong> communities have reasonable hope that the transition to a sustainable economy<br />

does not translate into social pain for them, they will be far less likely to oppose change. Creating<br />

opportunities for affected workers to learn new skills <strong>and</strong> providing assistance in their shift to<br />

new careers will be key. This may entail financial support to help pay tuition for vocational <strong>and</strong><br />

other training programs, transition income support, <strong>and</strong> career counseling <strong>and</strong> placement<br />

services. The more that the economy moves from resource extraction <strong>and</strong> mass production to<br />

services <strong>and</strong> a “knowledge” economy, in which skill requirements change frequently, the more<br />

do training <strong>and</strong> retraining become an issue for the economy as a whole.<br />

Important as they are, educational <strong>and</strong> skill-building programs by themselves are an inadequate<br />

response to the transition challenge. Measures to spur job creation <strong>and</strong> build a sustainable<br />

<strong>economic</strong> base are equally important. Because the transition challenge is especially pronounced<br />

in areas where fossil fuel extraction plays a disproportionate <strong>economic</strong> role, governments will<br />

need to design programs to assist regions with unsustainable <strong>and</strong> declining industries. This means<br />

helping to diversify <strong>and</strong> broaden the <strong>economic</strong> base <strong>and</strong> to build infrastructures that can support<br />

such a shift.<br />

An exciting example <strong>of</strong> this approach - locating “sunrise” industries in regions affected by the<br />

decline <strong>of</strong> “sunset” industries - can be found in one <strong>of</strong> the world’s most famous coal mining<br />

regions. In September 1999, the British government announced a strategy to make the<br />

northeastern region <strong>of</strong> Engl<strong>and</strong> a center for renewable energy jobs <strong>and</strong> projects, including solar<br />

photovoltaics, wind turbines, <strong>and</strong> cogeneration. (The region includes the city <strong>of</strong> Newcastle-<br />

Upon-Tyne, home to the world’s first commercial electricity generating station <strong>and</strong> subsequently<br />

the phrase “taking coals to Newcastle.”) The region, whose coal use continues to drop <strong>and</strong> which<br />

is now a net coal importer, already produces one quarter <strong>of</strong> Britain’s cogenerated energy. The<br />

plan includes a target <strong>of</strong> creating 3,500 new jobs, cutting energy consumption by 16 percent, <strong>and</strong><br />

reducing carbon emissions by 14 percent by the year 2010.<br />

In addition to “taking renewables to Newcastle,” some governments <strong>and</strong> businesses are creating<br />

“solar valleys” much as they once developed coal-, oil-, or gas-extracting regions. Claiming the<br />

German region <strong>of</strong> Helmond-Gelsenkirchen could become a European “Solar Valley,” Shell<br />

Renewables opened in November 1999 a fully-automated solar cell production plant - the<br />

continent’s largest - in Gelsenkirchen. At full capacity, the plant is expected to produce 25<br />

megawatts <strong>of</strong> cells, enough to power up to 7,000 European households <strong>and</strong> save 20,000 tons <strong>of</strong><br />

carbon dioxide annually; create 45 direct jobs <strong>and</strong> more than 200 jobs in manufacturing,<br />

marketing, <strong>and</strong> the supply chain; <strong>and</strong> meet dem<strong>and</strong> both in Europe <strong>and</strong> in rural electrification<br />

markets in South Africa, India, <strong>and</strong> Sri Lanka.<br />

Governments can also adopt measures that reward job creation by companies, <strong>and</strong> particularly<br />

well-paying jobs. Favorable tax treatment for job creation would be part <strong>of</strong> a broader recalibration<br />

<strong>of</strong> fiscal tools to shift the emphasis from labor productivity to resource productivity -<br />

from promoting resource extraction to supporting new employment.<br />

83

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!