03.01.2014 Views

sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC

sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC

sectoral economic costs and benefits of ghg mitigation - IPCC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Transport<br />

The rapid expansion in the dem<strong>and</strong> for transportation services, which underlies the growth in<br />

energy dem<strong>and</strong>, can be expected to continue over the next two decades as per-capita income<br />

continues to grow. Growth will be especially rapid among low- <strong>and</strong> middle-income countries<br />

outside the OECD in which income growth rates <strong>and</strong> income elasticity <strong>of</strong> private vehicle<br />

ownership are expected to be high. However, among the OECD countries, the transportation<br />

sector in Japan has been increasing the fastest (16.3%) compared to USA (6%) <strong>and</strong> Germany<br />

(9%).<br />

Policy framework to mitigate emissions<br />

In developing countries, air quality management is an emerging priority, <strong>and</strong> the main motivator<br />

is the health effect. Accordingly, the control <strong>of</strong> local air pollutants emitted by motor vehicles in<br />

developing country cities is awarded priority over GHGs responsible for global climate change<br />

concerns. Major local air pollutants emitted by motor vehicles include nitrogen oxides (NO x ),<br />

hydrocarbons (HCs), carbon monoxide (CO), sulphur oxides (SO x ), particulate matter less than<br />

10 microns in diametre (PM 10 ), <strong>and</strong> lead (Pb). From an air quality management principle, their<br />

relative weighting based on toxicity levels <strong>of</strong> each pollutant is associated with uncertainty <strong>and</strong><br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional debate in locally motivated air pollution control programmes. Among these the<br />

problems <strong>and</strong> priorities will – <strong>and</strong> should – differ from one city to another. For instance, in a<br />

World Bank study, based on accepted health considerations, the approximate toxicity weighting<br />

factor <strong>of</strong> CO is estimated to be 0.04, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) 1.8, NO x 4.7, SO x 1.4,<br />

PM 10 2.3,<strong>and</strong> Pb 85, per emitted tonne <strong>of</strong> each pollutant (Wijetilleke <strong>and</strong> Karunaratne, 1995).<br />

Present pr<strong>of</strong>essional debate gives many reasons to believe that the relative weighting <strong>of</strong> PM 10<br />

could be even higher than what is reflected above. But, in a World Bank study in Santiago both<br />

Pb <strong>and</strong> CO were excluded in their analysis (Eskel<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Xie, 1998). Pb was excluded because<br />

Pb content in gasoline was insignificant <strong>and</strong> it was already in the process <strong>of</strong> being phased out<br />

completely, like most <strong>of</strong> the developing countries. CO was excluded because there are as yet no<br />

quantified dose-response functions in the literature.<br />

It is important to note that the gaseous <strong>and</strong> dust particles that are valued in a locally motivated<br />

programme are not valued in terms <strong>of</strong> global warming potential (GWP) <strong>and</strong> vice versa. The GWP<br />

is defined as a ratio <strong>of</strong> the global warming effect from one kilogram <strong>of</strong> a GHG relative to that<br />

from one kilogram <strong>of</strong> CO 2 over a specified period <strong>of</strong> time. The hydrocarbons that are targeted for<br />

emission control in air pollution control programme (VOCs or non-methane hydrocarbons) are<br />

targeted precisely because <strong>of</strong> their reactivity. In contrast, the only hydrocarbon that is given a<br />

value different from its terminal role as CO 2 is methane, which has a high discounted GWP<br />

because it lives long in the atmosphere in a form with much higher spontaneous GWP than CO 2 .<br />

When emissions <strong>of</strong> VOCs <strong>and</strong> CO are reduced in a locally motivated air pollution control<br />

programme, the result is merely to increase the share <strong>of</strong> carbon atoms that are emitted directly as<br />

CO 2 (more complete combustion). Such technical controls, therefore, have no significant effect<br />

on global warming. When a technical option contributes to GHG emissions reduction, it is<br />

typically because the option makes vehicles more fuel-efficient. Thus, there are less pollution<br />

emissions per kilometres driven, but typically not per litre <strong>of</strong> fuel consumed.<br />

In view <strong>of</strong> the above discussion, the strategy that needs to be adopted in any developing country<br />

to reduce emission <strong>of</strong> local air pollutants <strong>and</strong> GHGs is discussed in the following two subsections.<br />

Strategy to reduce local pollution<br />

For reducing vehicular emissions <strong>of</strong> local air pollutants the following two approaches need to be<br />

adopted simultaneously: (1) reducing emissions per vehicle kilometre (in short, mass emissions)<br />

travelled <strong>and</strong> (2) reducing the total kilometres travelled.<br />

168

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!