06.08.2013 Views

MAP Technical Reports Series No. 106 UNEP

MAP Technical Reports Series No. 106 UNEP

MAP Technical Reports Series No. 106 UNEP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

- 29 -<br />

confounded with source emission. E.g., the amount of phosphorus and nitrogen in faeces<br />

produced per a 250 kg cow/day, determined under controlled rearing conditions, is rather<br />

constant, but the amount of phosphorus and nitrogen discharged to waterways from a herd of<br />

cows may vary according to forage conditions, age composition, rearing environment,<br />

zootechnical practice, etc. In a similar fashion, the unit amount of a nitrogen fertilizer applied to<br />

agricultural fields represent the unit source strength, but the amount lost from different fields<br />

depends on a variety of factors, such as the exact chemical nature and composition of the<br />

fertilizer used, soil properties, slop and drainage conditions, crop produced, etc. Accordingly, in<br />

order to assess the relative importance of all nitrogen and phosphorus sources, each single<br />

source has to be evaluated separately, and its fractional emission determined. The composite<br />

total is then obtained by summation. For reference cf. e.g., Vollenweider (1968), Porter (1975).<br />

In practice, a complete source assessment for each single case and basin is a tedious<br />

task, and certain shortcuts may be unavoidable. Assessment of point sources at the outlet point<br />

(normally discharge pipes) is generally straight forward on the condition that temporal variations<br />

in source discharges are duly taken into account. Quantities may be expressed as e.g., kg/day,<br />

t/year, etc., but in some cases it may desirable to refer quantities also to certain units, such as<br />

e.g., kg/inhabitant/year. Diffused sources cannot be measured directly, but may be assessed<br />

indirectly. This is possible, if basin conditions are reasonably well known, and experience gained<br />

from pilot studies or appropriately selected sub-basins can justifiably be transferred to and/or<br />

extended to the basin in question as a whole. Unit source emission of diffused sources is often<br />

expressed in terms of export coefficients, e.g., as kg/ha.year. Export coefficients are estimated<br />

experimentally in appropriately selected sub-basins, and careful analysis of the exported nutrient<br />

load at a calibrated river station.<br />

Table 1 provides some ideas about the magnitude and variation of such export<br />

coefficients as obtained in some 40 agricultural basins in Europe and <strong>No</strong>rth America. Values<br />

very much larger than the means resulted from highly fertilized fields.<br />

Phosphorus:<br />

Table 1<br />

Export Coefficients for Phosphorus and Nitrogen from Agricultural Areas,<br />

kg/ha.year<br />

AVG STD Nr GeoMean ±1 STD ±2 STD<br />

USA/Canada 0.26 0.29 15 0.15 0.43 0.05<br />

Europe 0.45 0.58 11 0.21 0.79 0.06<br />

All 0.34 0.45 26 0.17 0.57 0.05 1.89 0.02<br />

Nitrogen:<br />

USA/Canada 23.32 34.59 17 10.17 34.64 2.98<br />

Europe 13.11 11.35 25 6.84 30.21 1.55<br />

Max/Min 2.14 0.01<br />

All 17.39 24.52 42 8.08 32.62 2.00 131.8 0.50<br />

Max/Min 120 0.10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!