06.08.2013 Views

MAP Technical Reports Series No. 106 UNEP

MAP Technical Reports Series No. 106 UNEP

MAP Technical Reports Series No. 106 UNEP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

- 63 -<br />

estimates are about half of the <strong>UNEP</strong> figures. Besides, Béthoux budget estimates remain partial<br />

in any case neglecting retention by sedimentation of both, nitrogen and phosphorus, and nitrogen<br />

losses by denitrification. However, it might be that nitrogen retention and denitrification may<br />

approximately be balanced by the aeolian contribution. If our figures are correct as to the order<br />

of magnitude, aeolian nitrogen load could make out some 15 to 25% of the total.<br />

Table 18<br />

Areal Nitrogen and Phosphorus Load in g/m 2 .year;<br />

Selected Examples*<br />

Nitrogen Phosphorus **<br />

Baltic proper (210,000 km 2 ): 4.3 0.3 (0.1-0.2)<br />

<strong>No</strong>rth Sea (500,000 km 2 ):<br />

Atlantic exchagne load +<br />

atmospheric contribution<br />

River + direct discharges<br />

Inner Oslo Fjord (200 km 2 ): 17.0 3.0<br />

Laholm Bay (300 km 2 ): 24.0 1.4<br />

Japan:<br />

Tokyo Bay (1,400 km 2 )<br />

Ise Bay (170 km 2 )<br />

Seto Sea (22,000 km 2 )<br />

Adriatic Sea: Emilia-Romagna<br />

Coast (2,000 km 2 )<br />

(ortho-phosphate P)<br />

4.2<br />

1.9<br />

89.2<br />

43.4<br />

8.2<br />

0.9<br />

0.2<br />

10.7 (0.5-1.0)<br />

5.8 (0.5-1.0)<br />

0.8 (0.15-0.3)<br />

70.0 7.8 (0.4-0.8)<br />

3.6<br />

Mediterranean Sea<br />

(2,505,000 km 2 )<br />

land-based + aolian input 1.5$0.5 0.15$0.05 (#0.1)<br />

* Data elaborated from GESAMP, 1988<br />

** Values in parentheses indicate loading tolerance range that would apply to lakes<br />

of corresponding morphometry and hydrology<br />

A similar equalisation cannot be postulated for phosphorus as long as the aeolian<br />

contribution remains unknown. Also, it does not seem that as a whole the discrepancies could<br />

be explained by concentration increases due to increased nutrient discharges from land-based<br />

sources, as Mediterranean deep water concentrations remained practically constant over the<br />

last two decades (cf. data reported by Coste, 1969; McGill, 1969; Krom et al., 1991). It is more<br />

likely that a) the <strong>UNEP</strong> phosphorus load estimates have been overestimated, a conclusion that<br />

derives from an unacceptably low N/P average ratio (6.4 by atoms = 2.9 by weight), which is<br />

in contrast to our data; b) the return flow balance of 77,500 t/y is an underestimate. Taking our<br />

upper load estimate from land-based sources of 250,000 t/y, then

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!