CATULLUS 68 - Scuola Normale Superiore

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Baehrens, Emil (1878), ‘Vier Verbesserungen zu Catullus’, NJbb 117, 769-770. Munro, H.A.J. (1878), Criticisms and Elucidations of Catullus (Cambridge). – At 166-194. See also the 2 nd edition ed. by J.D. Duff (London, 1905). Schöll, Fritz (1880), ‘Zu Catullus’, NJbb 121, 471-496. – At 471-480. Schmidt, Moriz (1880), ‘Zu Catullus’, NJbb 121, 777-785. Schulzke, K.P. (1880), ‘Drei Catullfragen’, Zeitschrift für das Gymnasial-Wesen 34, 353-392. Harnecker, Otto (1881), Catulls carm. LXVIII (Friedeberg). Jacoby, Carl (1882), ‘Zu Catullus’, NJbb 125, 143f. Monse, Hugo (1884), Zu Catull (Waldenburg). Hermes, Friedrich (1888), Beiträge zur Kritik und Erklärung des Catull. Programm des königl. Friedrichs- Gymnasiums zu Frankfurt an der Oder, Ostern 1888 (Frankfurt a.O.). Postgate, J. P. (1888), ‘Catulliana’, JPh 17, 226-267. – At 251-253. Hermes, Friedrich (1889), Neue Beiträge zur Kritik und Erklärung des Catull (Frankfurt a.O.). Hoerschelmann, Wilhelm (1889), De Catulli carmine duodeseptuagesimo commentatio (Dorpati Livoniorum). Postgate, John Percival (1889), ‘Catulliana’, JPh 17, 226-267. – At 252. Birt, Theodorus (1890), De Catulli ad Mallium epistola commentariolum (Marpurgi). Weber, Hugo Ernst B. (1890), Quaestiones Catullianae (Gotha). Skutsch, Franz (1892), ‘Zum 68. Gedicht Catulls’, RhM 47, 138-151 = id., Kleine Schriften (Leipzig, 1914), 46-58. Fenner, Ludovicus (1896), Quaestiones Catullianae (Barmen). Macnaghten, Hugh (1897), ‘Catulliana’, JPh 25, 146-150. – At 149f. Rassfeld, Friedrich (1898), Die Stellung der Negation non bei Catull (ein Beitrag zur Erklärung des 68. Gedichts) (Höxter). Kalb, Alfons (1900), De duodeseptuagesimo carmine Catulli (Ansbach). Lucas, Hans (1900), ‘Recusatio’, in: Festschrift Johannes Vahlen zum siebzigsten Geburtstag gewidmet (Berlin), 317-333. – At 329-333. Vahlen, Johannes (1902), ‘Über Catull’s Elegie an M’Allius’, SPAW 44, 1024-1043 = id., Gesammelte philologische Schriften (Berlin, 1911-1923, repr. Hildesheim, 1970), 2.652-674. Birt, Theodor (1904), ‘Zu Catulls carmina maiora’, RhM 59, 407-450. Esp. 428-450. Nencini, Flaminio (1907), L’elegia di Catullo ad Allio (Roma & Milano). Hugo Magnus (1908), recension of Nencini (1907), BPhW 28, 876-878. Mess, Adolph von (1908), ‘Das 68. Gedicht Catulls und seine Stellung in der Geschichte der Elegie’, RhM 63, 488-494. Postgate, J.P. (1912), ‘On Catullus’, CPh 7, 1-16. – At 12-15. Frank, Tenney (1914), ‘A Rejected Poem and a Substitute. Catullus LXVIII A and B’, AJPh 35, 67-73. Guglielmino, Francesco (1915), ‘Sulla composizione del carme LXVIII di Catullo’, Athenaeum 3, 426-444. 276
Hartman, J.J. (1916), ‘De Catulli carmine LXVIII’, Mnemosyne 44, 88-99. Howald, Ernst (1918), ‘Zu Catull 68a’, BPhW 38, 141-144. Jachmann, Günther (1925), a recension of Kroll (1923 1 ), Gnomon 1, 200-214. – At 201 and 209-212. Tenney, Frank (1926), ‘Notes on Catullus’, CQ 20, 201-203. – At 201 on 68.157. Perrotta, Gennaro (1927), ‘L’elegia di Catullo ad Allio’, A&R, n.s. 8, 134-151. Jus, Ludovicus (1927-28), ‘De duodeseptuagesimo carmine Catulli I & II’, Eos 30 (1927), 77-92 & Eos 31 (1928), 63-77. Wheeler, Arthur Leslie (1934), Catullus and the Traditions of Ancient Poetry (Berkeley). Tescari, Honoratus (1935), ‘De Catulli carminis LXVIII interpretatione’, RFIC 14, 365-367. Herzog, Rudolf (1936), ‘Catulliana’, Hermes 71, 338-350. – At 346-348 on 68.157. Natoli, Gioacchino (1938), ‘La chiave del carme LXVIII di Catullo’, MondClass suppl. 8, 21-26. Prescott, Henry W. (1940), ‘The Unity of Catullus 68’, TAPhA 71, 473-500. Walter, Fritz (1940), ‘Zu einigen Dichterstellen’, PhW 60, 476. – On Cat. 68.157. Bardon, Henri (1943), L’art de la composition chez Catulle (Paris). – At 37-39. Viejo Otero, Eliseo B. (1943), ‘Sobre la unidad del c. LXVIII de Catulo’, Emerita 11, 123-133. Johnson, S. (1944-45), ‘A Fresh Solution of a Famous Crux in Catullus’, CJ 40, 10-18. Barwick, K. (1947), ‘Catulls c. 68 und eine Kompositionsform der römischen Elegie und Epigrammatik’, WJA 2, 1-15. Salvatore, Armando (1949), ‘L’unità del carme 68 di Catullo’, GIF 2, 36-49. B[ickel], E[rnst] (1950), ‘era verecunda: Catull 68, 136’, RhM 93, 384. Büchner, Karl (1950), ‘Catull 68, 136’, MH 7, 14-18. Della Corte, Francesco, --- (1951a), Due studi catulliani (Genova). – At 134-142. --- (1951b 1 , 1976 2 ), Personaggi catulliani (Firenze). – At 114-134. Pepe, Luigi (1953), ‘Il mito di Laodamia nel carme 68 di Catullo’, GIF 6, 107-113. Ferrero, Leonardo (1955), Interpretazione di Catullo (Torino). Salvatore, A. (1955), ‘Le poème 68 de Catulle et le problème de l’élégie latine’, Phoibos 6/7 (1951/52 and 1952/53, published 1955), 7-55. Wohlberg, Joseph (1955), ‘The structure of the Laodamia simile in Catullus 68b’, CPh 50, 42-46. Büchner, Karl (1957), ‘Die philologische Methode. Catull und die Elegie’, in: id., Humanitas Romana. Studien über Werke und Wesen der Römer (Heidelberg), 106-133. Copley, Frank O. (1957), ‘The Unity of Catullus 68: A Further View’, CPh 52, 29-32. Herrmann, Léon (1957), ‘Observations sur le text de Catulle’, Latomus 16, 672-683. – At 674f. Levine, Philip (1959), review of Mynors (1958), AJPh 80, 415-424. – At 421-423. Oliver, Revilo P. (1959), review of Mynors (1958), CPh 54, 51-53. – At 52f. Pennisi, Giuseppe (1959), ‘Il carme 68 di Catullo’, Emerita 27, 89-109 & 213-228. Baker, Sheridan (1960), ‘Lesbia’s Foot’, CPh 55, 171-173. 277
Page 1 and 2:
CATULLUS 68 Edited with an Introduc
Page 3 and 4:
Bei irgendeinem Spätling muß doch
Page 5 and 6:
the first place. As a result of all
Page 7 and 8:
When I started working on this volu
Page 9 and 10:
CONTENTS PREFACE ..................
Page 11 and 12:
At first sight, this debate could a
Page 13 and 14:
so that one would not have to look
Page 15 and 16:
least, non utriusque in line 39 cou
Page 17 and 18:
artistic unity of the poem ...” 2
Page 19 and 20:
can only claim that an expression s
Page 21 and 22:
later than the 6 th century A.D., a
Page 23 and 24:
(c) Carmen 68 is unitary and concer
Page 25 and 26:
Morgan is a separatist, while Lachm
Page 27 and 28:
This solution was proposed by Frank
Page 29 and 30:
(S 3) Lines 20 and 22-24 are repeat
Page 31 and 32:
(S 5) In lines 1-40 Catullus says h
Page 33 and 34:
in that of 1973 or in his 1988 revi
Page 35 and 36:
address in poem 68 for a number of
Page 37 and 38:
(1) R 2 (Coluccio Salutati) has add
Page 39 and 40:
whether the evidence at our disposa
Page 41 and 42:
later Torquatus tried unsuccessfull
Page 43 and 44:
68a that may support such an identi
Page 45 and 46:
straightforward Yes or No. In short
Page 47 and 48:
from a private letter. This could b
Page 49 and 50:
desertum in line 6). The second pai
Page 51 and 52:
I propose a twofold solution. There
Page 53 and 54:
***** Does Catullus reject both Man
Page 55 and 56:
some sort of practical contribution
Page 57 and 58:
methods and ideals of the doctus po
Page 59 and 60:
If a wealthy Roman male 122 was des
Page 61 and 62:
friends appear to have found romant
Page 63 and 64:
CATULLUS 68B ‘Goddesses, I cannot
Page 65 and 66:
There is space for disagreement abo
Page 67 and 68:
to be rather flexible; evidently Ca
Page 69 and 70:
loc.) - but here too it is not clea
Page 71 and 72:
and Lesbia. Twenty-five years have
Page 73 and 74:
One is the theme of human and divin
Page 75 and 76:
his exemplar from those that he mad
Page 77 and 78:
have been using not the archetype,
Page 79 and 80:
The apparatus criticus I should cla
Page 81 and 82:
It has been hard to decide whether
Page 83 and 84:
38 Hamburg - Stadt- und Universitä
Page 85 and 86:
CATULLI CARMEN LXVIIIA Quod mihi fo
Page 87 and 88:
nam mihi quam dederit duplex Amathu
Page 89 and 90:
ne Paris abducta gauisus libera moe
Page 91 and 92:
huc addant diui quam plurima, quae
Page 93 and 94:
poem through several stages of tran
Page 95 and 96:
mihi mitto ‘to send’, ‘to hav
Page 97 and 98:
daughter Tullia (Erskine 1997). Cic
Page 99 and 100:
Να⌠ακο⎜ω ≥δη, δεσ
Page 101 and 102:
spumantibus exspuit undis This expr
Page 103 and 104:
A somewhat peculiar interpretation
Page 105 and 106:
Prop. 1.8.33 and Tib. 1.1.43; terra
Page 107 and 108:
In the present passage caelibe evid
Page 109 and 110:
contemporaries; and it made Catullu
Page 111 and 112:
10 ‘… and that (it is) from her
Page 113 and 114:
• Theognis 249f. ο⎡ξ 〈ππ
Page 115 and 116:
• Solon frg. 26 West ƒργα δ
Page 117 and 118:
position to give them; he implies t
Page 119 and 120:
Ellis (ad loc.), Schöll (1880: 473
Page 121 and 122:
15-26 ‘I had my share of amorous
Page 123 and 124:
man (and a Roman citizen), that is,
Page 125 and 126:
actions (compare the plural of demo
Page 127 and 128:
would not have been taken over into
Page 129 and 130:
comedy (Pl. Curc. 697, Men. 1133, A
Page 131 and 132:
their own (see on sepulta in the pr
Page 133 and 134:
not] employ the offensively hyperbo
Page 135 and 136:
closer to turpe. This would be an e
Page 137 and 138:
quid agis? ...’). In general, scr
Page 139 and 140:
frigida ... membra Since erotic fer
Page 141 and 142:
29. What is ‘sad rather than sham
Page 143 and 144:
introduces a new point that is in s
Page 145 and 146:
1955 on Verg. Aen. 4.2, and cfr. Ca
Page 147 and 148:
you both, if I had any to hand.’
Page 149 and 150:
unius tantum ‘only of one’? Ove
Page 151 and 152:
without any hint that the investmen
Page 153 and 154:
68B: IN PRAISE OF ALLIUS 41-50 ‘G
Page 155 and 156:
are solved by Scaliger’s brillian
Page 157 and 158:
me’ is a much more suitable expre
Page 159 and 160:
monument (Fordyce), which is the pl
Page 161 and 162:
What makes the image effective and
Page 163 and 164:
eference to Allius’ funeral is po
Page 165 and 166:
Alternatively, it could be assumed
Page 167 and 168:
the island of the cattle of the Sun
Page 169 and 170:
fletu This verbal noun is well-esta
Page 171 and 172:
Culex 123f. primum prona surgebant
Page 173 and 174:
valley as if it were a slope than t
Page 175 and 176:
It remains to consider the rest of
Page 177 and 178:
prefers to follow O and writes uiat
Page 179 and 180:
pronoun (‘this man’), as this w
Page 181 and 182:
clausum Fordyce is probably right t
Page 183 and 184:
characterize the gift and not the g
Page 185 and 186:
far from the transmitted text, and
Page 187 and 188:
the Elder, N.H. 17.134 cum sit mutu
Page 189 and 190:
eloved as a goddess: thus Pl. Bacch
Page 191 and 192:
significantly different from the pr
Page 193 and 194:
511.65. constituo is not used elsew
Page 195 and 196:
exist in Latin, to -au-, which did;
Page 197 and 198:
77f. Catullus interrupts his narrat
Page 199 and 200:
ieiuna … desideret ara The altar
Page 201 and 202:
85f. The Parcae knew that Laodamia
Page 203 and 204:
y this time. Argiuus, meaning not o
Page 205 and 206:
Meillet s.v. cinis), but the Italia
Page 207 and 208:
that might simply be because it is
Page 209 and 210:
cognatos … cineres Enallage: ‘r
Page 211 and 212:
should be attached to the orthograp
Page 213 and 214:
were using the aspirated forms (Ora
Page 215 and 216:
109 quale Here and at 111 quod the
Page 217 and 218:
Stymphalia monstra ‘The Stymphali
Page 219 and 220:
altior illo, / qui … , which woul
Page 221 and 222:
First, it is hard to see how the ne
Page 223 and 224:
et flumina uim minuerunt and 6.645
Page 225 and 226: 126 improbius ‘More shamelessly
Page 227 and 228: 1549 - see Nomenclator 96), whose a
Page 229 and 230: garments, and the colours croceus a
Page 231 and 232: prose it is replaced by tametsi. It
Page 233 and 234: eassuring environment, with the win
Page 235 and 236: (Theb. 7x, Ach. 1x, Silu. 1x), Juve
Page 237 and 238: omniuoli This hapax legomenon is su
Page 239 and 240: this line at himself. But why shoul
Page 241 and 242: (Fordyce), nor is there any need to
Page 243 and 244: Consequently I do not think that on
Page 245 and 246: (1958: 103) and Trappes-Lomax (2007
Page 247 and 248: Trappes-Lomax (2007: 244) notes tha
Page 249 and 250: to diuus (7x against 2x), in the lo
Page 251 and 252: All these supplements presuppose th
Page 253 and 254: directed to God the Creator. He cou
Page 255 and 256: transdidi used by Fronto (Epist. p.
Page 257 and 258: for a shipwrecked man but must be a
Page 259 and 260: the previous and the following dist
Page 261 and 262: would have never wanted to say that
Page 263 and 264: conjecture and proposed another rec
Page 265 and 266: 5) Agius 75-78 uos nostis, quanta i
Page 267 and 268: APPENDIX II: CATULLUS’ SOURCES FO
Page 269 and 270: Catullus calls Protesilaus’ house
Page 271 and 272: BIBLIOGRAPHY A note on references C
Page 273 and 274: PLM Aemilius Baehrens ed. (1879-188
Page 275: G Catulle, Manuscrit de St-Germain-
Page 279 and 280: Heine, Rolf (1975), ‘Zu Catull c.
Page 281 and 282: Newman, John Kevin (1990), Roman Ca
Page 283 and 284: Berry, D.H. (1996), Cicero: Pro P.
Page 285 and 286: Graziosi Acquaro, Maria Teresa (197
Page 287 and 288: Pomey, Patrice (1997), ‘Les dange
Page 289: --- (1929), ‘Sepulcri Portuensis
show all

CATULLUS 68 - Scuola Normale Superiore

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?