05.04.2013 Views

CATULLUS 68 - Scuola Normale Superiore

CATULLUS 68 - Scuola Normale Superiore

CATULLUS 68 - Scuola Normale Superiore

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

have been well placed to provide him with it. But he could also have asked for a selection of good classical<br />

poetry. The mention of ‘the poets of old’ in line 7 would seem to support our hypothesis (B), that Manlius<br />

should have asked for some sort of poetry in particular – but we cannot tell whether this was classical or<br />

(more likely perhaps) contemporary poetry.<br />

But what are the munera Veneris? In Greek poetry the phrase ‘the gift(s) of Aphrodite’ refers either to lovemaking<br />

itself or to something or someone that is an accessory to it: a partner, marriage or sex-appeal (see<br />

further the Commentary on line 10). In short, munera Veneris could stand either for sex itself, or else for<br />

something that would have enabled Manlius to have his share of it (a partner, a rendez-vous vel sim.). This<br />

would allow for a very broad range of interpretations, but not all of these may be possible in view of the rest<br />

of the poem. Once again, it is worthwhile to go through the passages that might reflect on this request. There<br />

are two of these. Manlius is described as lying alone in his bed, deserted or else shunned by all; deprived of<br />

love and sex, he is unable to sleep (lines 7f.). He has asked Catullus for the munera Veneris (line 10); the<br />

poet apologizes that he is unable to provide these because his brother’s death has put an end to all his erotic<br />

pursuits (lines 15-32).<br />

It is very unlikely that munera Veneris should stand for love-poetry. First of all, there would be no parallels<br />

for such a usage, and it is easy to see why: unlike sex-appeal, marriage or a partner, love-poetry does not<br />

tend to make it easier for its recipient to obtain sexual satisfaction. Moreover, it is not easy to see what kind<br />

of love-poetry could soothe Manlius’ sufferings, as they are described in lines 7f. He would hardly want to<br />

read about others enjoying the same pleasures from which he has been barred himself. Finally, this<br />

interpretation would be at odds with the terms in which Catullus rejects Manlius’ request for he munera<br />

Musarum. The death of Catullus’ brother put an end to the erotic delights which he had occasion to enjoy as<br />

a young man (lines 15-26), so that it is not shameful but sad that all the best young men in Verona spend<br />

their nights alone (27-30); therefore Manlius will forgive him for not providing the gifts (i.e. those of Venus)<br />

that his bereavement has deprived him of (31f.). Catullus cannot give to Manlius what his bereavement has<br />

deprived him of, that is, the erotic games which he had enjoyed so often in the past; and lines 27-30 confirm,<br />

if it needs to be confirmed at all, that these games were not literary pastimes, but very real erotic adventures.<br />

Several interpretations have been proposed along these lines. Rather straightforwardly, some have taken<br />

munera Veneris simply to mean ‘love-making’. 121 Having been deprived of sex for some reason or another,<br />

Manlius would have asked Catullus to have pity on him and to make love to him himself. This interpretation<br />

has the advantage of hermeneutical simplicity: munera Veneris is taken in the most fundamental and most<br />

frequent sense of the Greek phrase ‘the gifts of Aphrodite’. However, there are difficulties of a different sort.<br />

121 Thus Kinsey 1967, Most 1981, Forsyth 1987 and Morgan 2008.<br />

58

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!