Dunbabin, R.L. (1917), ‘Notes on Latin poets’, CQ 11, 135-140. Edwards, Mark W. (1991), The Iliad: A Commentary. Volume V: books 17-20 (Cambridge). Erskine, Andrew (1997), ‘Cicero and the expression of grief’, in: Susanna Morton Braund & Christopher Gill edd., The Passions in Roman Thought and Literature (Cambridge), 36-47. Eyben, Emiel (1993), Restless Youth in Ancient Rome (London). Faure, Paul (1987), Parfums et aromates de l’Antiquité [Paris]. Fedeli, Paolo, --- (1980), Sesto Properzio: Il primo libro delle elegie (Firenze). --- (1988), ‘Biblioteche private e pubbliche a Roma e nel mondo romano’, in: Guglielmo Cavallo ed., Le biblioteche nel mondo antico e medievale (Roma & Bari), 29-64. --- (1994), Q. Orazio Flacco: Le Opere II. Tomo secondo: Le satire. Commento di … (Roma). --- (1997), Q. Orazio Flacco: Le Opere II. Tomo quarto: Le Epistole – l’Arte Poetica. Commento di ... (Roma). Finglass, P.J. (2007), Sophocles: Electra. Edited with Introduction and Commentary (Cambridge). Fitch, John G. (1987), Seneca’s Hercules Furens: A Critical Text with Introduction and Commentary (Ithaca and London). Fordyce, C.J. ed. (1977), P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Libri VII-VIII (Oxford). Fraenkel, Eduard (1957), Horace (Oxford). Frassinetti, Paolo (1974), ‘La Protesilaudamia di Levio’, in: Giulio Puccioni & Salvatore S. Ingallina edd., Poesia latina in frammenti. Miscellanea filologica (Genova), 315-326. Froebel, Johann (1910), Ennio quid debuerit Catullus (Weidae). Fowler, Don (1999), ‘Criticism as commentary and commentary as criticism in the age of electronic media’, in: G.W. Most ed., Aporemata 4: Commentaries - Kommentare (Heidelberg), 426-442. Fraenkel, Eduard (1957), Horace (Oxford). Frazer, J.G. ed. (1898), Pausanias’ Description of Greece (6 vols., London). – Reprinted in New York in 1965. Gaertner, Jan Felix (2005), Ovid Epistulae ex Ponto, Book I Edited with Introduction, Translation, and Commentary (Oxford). Gagnér, Anders (1931), Studien zur Bedeutung der Präposition apud (Uppsala). Gaisser, Julia Haig (1993), Catullus and his Renaissance Readers (Oxford). Gardner, Jane F. (1986), Women in Roman Law & Society (London). Georg, Bernhard (1996), ‘Catullus 61.90-6’, CQ n.s. 46, 302-304. Goold, G. P., --- (1958), ‘A New Text of Catullus’, Phoenix 12, 93-116. --- (1969), ‘Catullus 3.16’, Phoenix 23, 186-203. Gostoli, Antonia ed. (1990), Terpander (Roma). Gow, A.S.F. ed. (1950), Theocritus (2 vols., Cambridge). 284
Graziosi Acquaro, Maria Teresa (1970), ‘Petri Odi Montopolitani Carmina nunc primum e libris manu scriptis edita’, Humanistica Lovaniensia 19, 7-113. Green, Peter (1997), The Argonautika by Apollonios Rhodios Translated, with Introduction, Commentary and Glossary (Berkeley). Hahn, Emma Adelaide (1922), ‘Hendiadys: Is There Such A Thing?’, CW 15, 193-197. Hale, William Gardner, --- (1887-1889), The cum-constructions: their history and functions (2 vols., Ithaca, N.Y.). --- (1899), ‘Der Codex Romanus des Catullus’, Hermes 34, 133-144. Handford, S.A. (1946), The Latin subjunctive (London). Heine, Rolf ed. (1975), Catull (Darmstadt). Helzle, Martin (1989), Publii Ovidii Nasonis Epistularum ex Ponto liber IV (Hildesheim). Herzog-Hauser, G. (1937), ‘Die literarische Ausgestaltung der Protesilaos-Mythe’, in: Annuaire de l’Institut de philologie et d’histoire orientales et slaves 5 = Mélanges Émile Boisacq vol. 2 (Bruxelles), 471-478. Heusch, Heinrich (1954), Das Archaische in der Sprache Catulls (Bonn). Heyworth, Stephen J. (1995), ‘Dividing Poems’, in: Pecere and Reeve (1995), 117-148. Hijmans, B.L. Jr., R.Th. van der Paardt, V. Schmidt, C.B.J. Settels, B. Wesseling & R.E.H. Westendorp Boerma (1985), Apuleius Madaurensis Metamorphoses Book VIII. Text, Introduction and Commentary (Groningen). Hinds, Stephen (1987), ‘Generalising about Ovid’, Ramus 16, 4-31. Hirzel, Rudolf (1907), Themis, Dike und Verwandtes. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der Rechtsidee bei den Griechen (Leipzig). – Reprinted in Hildesheim in 1966. Hollis, Adrian S. (2007), Fragments of Roman Poetry c.60 BC-AD 20 (Oxford). Jocelyn, H.D. (1984), ‘Cicero, Philippic 13.24 and the uses of gremium in classical Latin’, LCM 9.2, 18-21. Jouan, François (1966), Euripide et les légendes des Chants Cypriens. Des origines de la guerre de Troie à L’Iliade (Paris). Kenney, E. J. (1996), Ovid Heroides XVI-XXI (Cambridge). Kerkhecker, Arnd (1999), Callimachus’ Book of Iambi (Oxford). Kierdorf, Wilhelm (1991), ‘Totenehrung im republikanischen Rom’, in: Gerhard Binder and Bernd Effe edd., Tod und Jenseits im Altertum (Trier), 71-87. Kißel, Walter (1990), Aulus Persius Flaccus: Satiren (Heidelberg). Klotz, Alfred (1931), ‘Zu Catull’, RhM 80, 342-356. Koziol, Heinrich (1872), Der Stil des L. Apuleius: Ein Beitrag zur Kenntnis der sogenannten afrikanischen Lateins (Wien; reprinted in Hildesheim, 1988). Krostenko, Brian A. (2001), Cicero, Catullus, and the language of social performance (Chicago). Lausberg, Heinrich (1960), Handbuch der literarischen Rhetorik: Eine Grundlegung der Literaturwissenschaft (München). Leo, Friedrich (1912), Plautinische Forschungen zur Kritik und Geschichte der Komödie, 2nd ed. (Berlin). 285
- Page 1 and 2:
CATULLUS 68 Edited with an Introduc
- Page 3 and 4:
Bei irgendeinem Spätling muß doch
- Page 5 and 6:
the first place. As a result of all
- Page 7 and 8:
When I started working on this volu
- Page 9 and 10:
CONTENTS PREFACE ..................
- Page 11 and 12:
At first sight, this debate could a
- Page 13 and 14:
so that one would not have to look
- Page 15 and 16:
least, non utriusque in line 39 cou
- Page 17 and 18:
artistic unity of the poem ...” 2
- Page 19 and 20:
can only claim that an expression s
- Page 21 and 22:
later than the 6 th century A.D., a
- Page 23 and 24:
(c) Carmen 68 is unitary and concer
- Page 25 and 26:
Morgan is a separatist, while Lachm
- Page 27 and 28:
This solution was proposed by Frank
- Page 29 and 30:
(S 3) Lines 20 and 22-24 are repeat
- Page 31 and 32:
(S 5) In lines 1-40 Catullus says h
- Page 33 and 34:
in that of 1973 or in his 1988 revi
- Page 35 and 36:
address in poem 68 for a number of
- Page 37 and 38:
(1) R 2 (Coluccio Salutati) has add
- Page 39 and 40:
whether the evidence at our disposa
- Page 41 and 42:
later Torquatus tried unsuccessfull
- Page 43 and 44:
68a that may support such an identi
- Page 45 and 46:
straightforward Yes or No. In short
- Page 47 and 48:
from a private letter. This could b
- Page 49 and 50:
desertum in line 6). The second pai
- Page 51 and 52:
I propose a twofold solution. There
- Page 53 and 54:
***** Does Catullus reject both Man
- Page 55 and 56:
some sort of practical contribution
- Page 57 and 58:
methods and ideals of the doctus po
- Page 59 and 60:
If a wealthy Roman male 122 was des
- Page 61 and 62:
friends appear to have found romant
- Page 63 and 64:
CATULLUS 68B ‘Goddesses, I cannot
- Page 65 and 66:
There is space for disagreement abo
- Page 67 and 68:
to be rather flexible; evidently Ca
- Page 69 and 70:
loc.) - but here too it is not clea
- Page 71 and 72:
and Lesbia. Twenty-five years have
- Page 73 and 74:
One is the theme of human and divin
- Page 75 and 76:
his exemplar from those that he mad
- Page 77 and 78:
have been using not the archetype,
- Page 79 and 80:
The apparatus criticus I should cla
- Page 81 and 82:
It has been hard to decide whether
- Page 83 and 84:
38 Hamburg - Stadt- und Universitä
- Page 85 and 86:
CATULLI CARMEN LXVIIIA Quod mihi fo
- Page 87 and 88:
nam mihi quam dederit duplex Amathu
- Page 89 and 90:
ne Paris abducta gauisus libera moe
- Page 91 and 92:
huc addant diui quam plurima, quae
- Page 93 and 94:
poem through several stages of tran
- Page 95 and 96:
mihi mitto ‘to send’, ‘to hav
- Page 97 and 98:
daughter Tullia (Erskine 1997). Cic
- Page 99 and 100:
Να⌠ακο⎜ω ≥δη, δεσ
- Page 101 and 102:
spumantibus exspuit undis This expr
- Page 103 and 104:
A somewhat peculiar interpretation
- Page 105 and 106:
Prop. 1.8.33 and Tib. 1.1.43; terra
- Page 107 and 108:
In the present passage caelibe evid
- Page 109 and 110:
contemporaries; and it made Catullu
- Page 111 and 112:
10 ‘… and that (it is) from her
- Page 113 and 114:
• Theognis 249f. ο⎡ξ 〈ππ
- Page 115 and 116:
• Solon frg. 26 West ƒργα δ
- Page 117 and 118:
position to give them; he implies t
- Page 119 and 120:
Ellis (ad loc.), Schöll (1880: 473
- Page 121 and 122:
15-26 ‘I had my share of amorous
- Page 123 and 124:
man (and a Roman citizen), that is,
- Page 125 and 126:
actions (compare the plural of demo
- Page 127 and 128:
would not have been taken over into
- Page 129 and 130:
comedy (Pl. Curc. 697, Men. 1133, A
- Page 131 and 132:
their own (see on sepulta in the pr
- Page 133 and 134:
not] employ the offensively hyperbo
- Page 135 and 136:
closer to turpe. This would be an e
- Page 137 and 138:
quid agis? ...’). In general, scr
- Page 139 and 140:
frigida ... membra Since erotic fer
- Page 141 and 142:
29. What is ‘sad rather than sham
- Page 143 and 144:
introduces a new point that is in s
- Page 145 and 146:
1955 on Verg. Aen. 4.2, and cfr. Ca
- Page 147 and 148:
you both, if I had any to hand.’
- Page 149 and 150:
unius tantum ‘only of one’? Ove
- Page 151 and 152:
without any hint that the investmen
- Page 153 and 154:
68B: IN PRAISE OF ALLIUS 41-50 ‘G
- Page 155 and 156:
are solved by Scaliger’s brillian
- Page 157 and 158:
me’ is a much more suitable expre
- Page 159 and 160:
monument (Fordyce), which is the pl
- Page 161 and 162:
What makes the image effective and
- Page 163 and 164:
eference to Allius’ funeral is po
- Page 165 and 166:
Alternatively, it could be assumed
- Page 167 and 168:
the island of the cattle of the Sun
- Page 169 and 170:
fletu This verbal noun is well-esta
- Page 171 and 172:
Culex 123f. primum prona surgebant
- Page 173 and 174:
valley as if it were a slope than t
- Page 175 and 176:
It remains to consider the rest of
- Page 177 and 178:
prefers to follow O and writes uiat
- Page 179 and 180:
pronoun (‘this man’), as this w
- Page 181 and 182:
clausum Fordyce is probably right t
- Page 183 and 184:
characterize the gift and not the g
- Page 185 and 186:
far from the transmitted text, and
- Page 187 and 188:
the Elder, N.H. 17.134 cum sit mutu
- Page 189 and 190:
eloved as a goddess: thus Pl. Bacch
- Page 191 and 192:
significantly different from the pr
- Page 193 and 194:
511.65. constituo is not used elsew
- Page 195 and 196:
exist in Latin, to -au-, which did;
- Page 197 and 198:
77f. Catullus interrupts his narrat
- Page 199 and 200:
ieiuna … desideret ara The altar
- Page 201 and 202:
85f. The Parcae knew that Laodamia
- Page 203 and 204:
y this time. Argiuus, meaning not o
- Page 205 and 206:
Meillet s.v. cinis), but the Italia
- Page 207 and 208:
that might simply be because it is
- Page 209 and 210:
cognatos … cineres Enallage: ‘r
- Page 211 and 212:
should be attached to the orthograp
- Page 213 and 214:
were using the aspirated forms (Ora
- Page 215 and 216:
109 quale Here and at 111 quod the
- Page 217 and 218:
Stymphalia monstra ‘The Stymphali
- Page 219 and 220:
altior illo, / qui … , which woul
- Page 221 and 222:
First, it is hard to see how the ne
- Page 223 and 224:
et flumina uim minuerunt and 6.645
- Page 225 and 226:
126 improbius ‘More shamelessly
- Page 227 and 228:
1549 - see Nomenclator 96), whose a
- Page 229 and 230:
garments, and the colours croceus a
- Page 231 and 232:
prose it is replaced by tametsi. It
- Page 233 and 234: eassuring environment, with the win
- Page 235 and 236: (Theb. 7x, Ach. 1x, Silu. 1x), Juve
- Page 237 and 238: omniuoli This hapax legomenon is su
- Page 239 and 240: this line at himself. But why shoul
- Page 241 and 242: (Fordyce), nor is there any need to
- Page 243 and 244: Consequently I do not think that on
- Page 245 and 246: (1958: 103) and Trappes-Lomax (2007
- Page 247 and 248: Trappes-Lomax (2007: 244) notes tha
- Page 249 and 250: to diuus (7x against 2x), in the lo
- Page 251 and 252: All these supplements presuppose th
- Page 253 and 254: directed to God the Creator. He cou
- Page 255 and 256: transdidi used by Fronto (Epist. p.
- Page 257 and 258: for a shipwrecked man but must be a
- Page 259 and 260: the previous and the following dist
- Page 261 and 262: would have never wanted to say that
- Page 263 and 264: conjecture and proposed another rec
- Page 265 and 266: 5) Agius 75-78 uos nostis, quanta i
- Page 267 and 268: APPENDIX II: CATULLUS’ SOURCES FO
- Page 269 and 270: Catullus calls Protesilaus’ house
- Page 271 and 272: BIBLIOGRAPHY A note on references C
- Page 273 and 274: PLM Aemilius Baehrens ed. (1879-188
- Page 275 and 276: G Catulle, Manuscrit de St-Germain-
- Page 277 and 278: Hartman, J.J. (1916), ‘De Catulli
- Page 279 and 280: Heine, Rolf (1975), ‘Zu Catull c.
- Page 281 and 282: Newman, John Kevin (1990), Roman Ca
- Page 283: Berry, D.H. (1996), Cicero: Pro P.
- Page 287 and 288: Pomey, Patrice (1997), ‘Les dange
- Page 289: --- (1929), ‘Sepulcri Portuensis