CATULLUS 68 - Scuola Normale Superiore

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Horváth, I. K. (1960), ‘Diva Candida’, in: ‘Chronologica Catulliana’, AAntHung 8 (1960), 335-368, at 336- 347 = Heine (1975), 377-395. Alfonsi, Luigi (1961), ‘Catullo elegiaco’, Aparchai 4 = Gedenkschrift für G. Rhode (Tübingen), 9-21 ~ id., transl. Hugo Beikircher (1975), ‘Catull als Elegiker’, in Heine (1975), 360-376. Cazzaniga, Ignazio (1961), ‘Catullo 68b, 50-60 e i vv. 1-7 del papiro Lond. di Partenio di Nicea’, PP 16, 124-126. Lieberg, Godo (1962), Puella divina: Die Gestalt der göttlichen Geliebten bei Catull in Zusammenhang der antiken Dichtung (Amsterdam). Godel, Robert (1965), ‘Catulle, poème 68’, MH 22, 53-65. Oksala, Päivö (1965), Adnotationes Criticae ad Catulli Carmina = Suomalaisen Tiedeakatemian Toimituksia. Annales Academiae Scientiarum Fennicae ser. B, vol. 135.2 (Helsinki). – At 85-88. Schäfer, Eckhart (1966), Das Verhältis von Erlebnis und Kunstgestalt bei Catull (Wiesbaden). – Esp. 77-95. Thomamüller, Klaus (1966), Der Tod des Bruders. Antike Fälschungen im Catull-Text (Hamburg). – At 34- 37. Vretska, Karl (1966), ‘Das Problem der Einheit von Catull c. 68’, WS 79, 313-330. Cremona, Virginio (1967), ‘Il carme 68 di Catullo ‘Carmen Dupliciter Duplex’, Aevum 41, 246-279. Granarolo, Jean (1967), L’œuvre de Catulle. Aspects religieux, éthiques et stylistiques (Paris). Kinsey, T.E. (1967), ‘Some Problems in Catullus 68’, Latomus 26, 35-53. Williams, Gordon (1968), Tradition and Originality in Roman Poetry (Oxford). – At 229-239. Streuli, Peter Ernst (1969), Die Lesbia-Partien in Catulls Allius-Elegie. Ein Kommentar (Urnaesch). Hering, Wolfgang (1970), ‘Die Komposition der sogenannten Allius-Elegie (Catull c. 68.41ff.)’, WZRostock 19, 599-604. Holleman, A.W.J. (1970), ‘Lesbia als Verecunda Era (carm. 68,136)’, Hermeneus 41, 192-194. Wilkinson, L.P. (1970), ‘Domina in Catullus 68’, CR 20, 290. Hering, Wolfgang (1972), ‘Beobachtungen zu Catull c. 68,41-160’, ACD 8, 31-61. Robson, Arthur G. (1972), ‘Catullus 68.53: The Coherence and Force of Tradition’, TAPhA 103, 433-439. Skinner, Marilyn B. (1972), ‘The Unity of Catullus 68: The Structure of 68a’, TAPhA 103, 495-512. Coppel, Bernhard (1973), Das Alliusgedicht: Zur Redaktion des Catullcorpus (Heidelberg). Macleod, Colin W. (1974), ‘A Use of Myth in Ancient Poetry’, CQ 24, 82-93. – At 82-88. McClure, Robert (1974), ‘The Structure of Catullus 68’, CSCA 7, 215-229. Reynen, Hans (1974), ‘Rara verecundae furta feremus erae’, MH 31, 150-154. Schmid, Walter (1974), Catullus. Ansichten und Durchblicke (Göppingen). – At 33-107. Wiseman, Timothy Peter (1974a), ‘Catullus 68.157’, CR 24, 6f. --- (1974b), ‘ Catullus, ‘poem 68’ ’, in: Cinna the Poet and other Roman essays (Leicester). – At 77-103, and cfr. 70-76. Baker, Robert J. (1975), ‘Domina at Catullus 68.68: Mistress or Chatelaine?’, RhM 118, 124-129. Bauer, Johannes B. (1975), ‘Erae furta verecundae (Catull 68, 136)’, WS n.s. 9, 78-82. 278
Heine, Rolf (1975), ‘Zu Catull c. 68’, Latomus 34, 166-186. Monbrun, M. (1975), ‘A propos du poème 68 de Catulle. Quelques considérations sur la métrique et l’ordre des mots’, Pallas 22, 23-41. Offermann, Helmut (1975), ‘Der Flussvergleich bei Catull, c. 68,57ff.’, Philologus 119, 57-69. Solmsen, F. (1975), ‘Catullus’ artistry in c. 68: A pre-Augustan subjective love-elegy’, in: Monumentum Chilonense: Studien zur Augusteischen Zeit. Kieler Festschrift für E. Burck (Amsterdam), 260-276. Bright, David F. (1976), ‘Confectum Carmine Munus: Catullus 68’, ICS 1, 86-112. Gantar, K. (1976), ‘Einige Beobachtungen zu Catull c. 68,71-73’, GB 5, 117-121. Levine, Philip (1976), ‘Catullus c. 68. A New Perspective’, CSCA 9, 61-88. Phillips, Jane E. (1976), ‘The Pattern of Images in Catullus 68.51-62’, AJPh 97, 340-343. Sarkissian, John (1977), A re-examination and interpretation of Catullus 68 (Diss. Duke: Durham). Stoessl, Franz (1977), C. Valerius Catullus: Mensch, Leben, Dichtung (Meisenheim am Glan). – Esp. 154- 160. Holleman, A.W.J. (1978), ‘Lesbia as a verecunda era (Cat., 68, 136)’, RBPh 56, 38-40. Nisbet, R.G.M. (1978), ‘Notes on the text of Catullus’, PCPhS n.s. 24, 92-115. – At 105-108. Sandy, Gerald N. (1978), ‘Indebtedness, scurrilitas, and composition in Catullus (Cat. 44, 1, 68)’, Phoenix 32, 68-80. Shipton, K.M.W. (1978), ‘Catullus 68’, LCM 3, 57-64. Thomas, Richard F. (1978), ‘An Alternative to Ceremonial Negligence (Catullus 68.73-8)’, HSCPh 82, 175- 178. Yardley, J.C. (1978), ‘Copia scriptorum in Catullus 68.33’, Phoenix 32, 337-339. Citroni, Mario (1979), ‘Destinatario e pubblico nella poesia di Catullo’, MD 2, 43-100. – Reprinted with changes in: id. (1995), Poesia e lettori in Roma antica. Forme della comunicazione letteraria (Roma & Bari), 57-117. Della Corte, Francesco (1979), ‘Arguta solea’, RFIC 107, 30-34 = Opuscula 7 (1983), 57-61. – On 68.72. Mantero, Teresa (1979), ‘Crocina candidus in tunica’, in: Studi di Poesia Latina in Onore di Antonio Traglia (Roma), 1.161-192. – On 68.134. Dee, J.H. (1980), ‘Catullus 68.155-60 : An Observation’, CW 73.7, 420. Lyne, R.O.A.M. (1980 1 , 1996 2 ), The Latin Love Poets From Catullus to Horace (London). – At 52-60 (‘Aspects of Poem 68’). Pasoli, Elio (1980), ‘Appunto sul ruolo del c. 68 di Catullo nell’origine dell’elegia latina’, Actes du colloque ‘L’Elégie romaine: Enracinement – Thèmes – Diffusion’, mars 1979 (= Bulletin de la Faculté des Lettres de Mulhouse, fasc. X, Paris), 17-26. Van Sickle, John (1980), ‘Catullus 68.73-8 in Context (vv. 67-80)’, HSCPh 84, 91-95. Williams, Gordon (1980), Figures of Thought in Roman Poetry (New Haven). – At 50-61. Most, Glenn W. (1981), ‘On the Arrangement of Catullus’ Carmina Maiora’, Philologus 125, 109-125. – Esp. 116-125. 279
Page 1 and 2:
CATULLUS 68 Edited with an Introduc
Page 3 and 4:
Bei irgendeinem Spätling muß doch
Page 5 and 6:
the first place. As a result of all
Page 7 and 8:
When I started working on this volu
Page 9 and 10:
CONTENTS PREFACE ..................
Page 11 and 12:
At first sight, this debate could a
Page 13 and 14:
so that one would not have to look
Page 15 and 16:
least, non utriusque in line 39 cou
Page 17 and 18:
artistic unity of the poem ...” 2
Page 19 and 20:
can only claim that an expression s
Page 21 and 22:
later than the 6 th century A.D., a
Page 23 and 24:
(c) Carmen 68 is unitary and concer
Page 25 and 26:
Morgan is a separatist, while Lachm
Page 27 and 28:
This solution was proposed by Frank
Page 29 and 30:
(S 3) Lines 20 and 22-24 are repeat
Page 31 and 32:
(S 5) In lines 1-40 Catullus says h
Page 33 and 34:
in that of 1973 or in his 1988 revi
Page 35 and 36:
address in poem 68 for a number of
Page 37 and 38:
(1) R 2 (Coluccio Salutati) has add
Page 39 and 40:
whether the evidence at our disposa
Page 41 and 42:
later Torquatus tried unsuccessfull
Page 43 and 44:
68a that may support such an identi
Page 45 and 46:
straightforward Yes or No. In short
Page 47 and 48:
from a private letter. This could b
Page 49 and 50:
desertum in line 6). The second pai
Page 51 and 52:
I propose a twofold solution. There
Page 53 and 54:
***** Does Catullus reject both Man
Page 55 and 56:
some sort of practical contribution
Page 57 and 58:
methods and ideals of the doctus po
Page 59 and 60:
If a wealthy Roman male 122 was des
Page 61 and 62:
friends appear to have found romant
Page 63 and 64:
CATULLUS 68B ‘Goddesses, I cannot
Page 65 and 66:
There is space for disagreement abo
Page 67 and 68:
to be rather flexible; evidently Ca
Page 69 and 70:
loc.) - but here too it is not clea
Page 71 and 72:
and Lesbia. Twenty-five years have
Page 73 and 74:
One is the theme of human and divin
Page 75 and 76:
his exemplar from those that he mad
Page 77 and 78:
have been using not the archetype,
Page 79 and 80:
The apparatus criticus I should cla
Page 81 and 82:
It has been hard to decide whether
Page 83 and 84:
38 Hamburg - Stadt- und Universitä
Page 85 and 86:
CATULLI CARMEN LXVIIIA Quod mihi fo
Page 87 and 88:
nam mihi quam dederit duplex Amathu
Page 89 and 90:
ne Paris abducta gauisus libera moe
Page 91 and 92:
huc addant diui quam plurima, quae
Page 93 and 94:
poem through several stages of tran
Page 95 and 96:
mihi mitto ‘to send’, ‘to hav
Page 97 and 98:
daughter Tullia (Erskine 1997). Cic
Page 99 and 100:
Να⌠ακο⎜ω ≥δη, δεσ
Page 101 and 102:
spumantibus exspuit undis This expr
Page 103 and 104:
A somewhat peculiar interpretation
Page 105 and 106:
Prop. 1.8.33 and Tib. 1.1.43; terra
Page 107 and 108:
In the present passage caelibe evid
Page 109 and 110:
contemporaries; and it made Catullu
Page 111 and 112:
10 ‘… and that (it is) from her
Page 113 and 114:
• Theognis 249f. ο⎡ξ 〈ππ
Page 115 and 116:
• Solon frg. 26 West ƒργα δ
Page 117 and 118:
position to give them; he implies t
Page 119 and 120:
Ellis (ad loc.), Schöll (1880: 473
Page 121 and 122:
15-26 ‘I had my share of amorous
Page 123 and 124:
man (and a Roman citizen), that is,
Page 125 and 126:
actions (compare the plural of demo
Page 127 and 128:
would not have been taken over into
Page 129 and 130:
comedy (Pl. Curc. 697, Men. 1133, A
Page 131 and 132:
their own (see on sepulta in the pr
Page 133 and 134:
not] employ the offensively hyperbo
Page 135 and 136:
closer to turpe. This would be an e
Page 137 and 138:
quid agis? ...’). In general, scr
Page 139 and 140:
frigida ... membra Since erotic fer
Page 141 and 142:
29. What is ‘sad rather than sham
Page 143 and 144:
introduces a new point that is in s
Page 145 and 146:
1955 on Verg. Aen. 4.2, and cfr. Ca
Page 147 and 148:
you both, if I had any to hand.’
Page 149 and 150:
unius tantum ‘only of one’? Ove
Page 151 and 152:
without any hint that the investmen
Page 153 and 154:
68B: IN PRAISE OF ALLIUS 41-50 ‘G
Page 155 and 156:
are solved by Scaliger’s brillian
Page 157 and 158:
me’ is a much more suitable expre
Page 159 and 160:
monument (Fordyce), which is the pl
Page 161 and 162:
What makes the image effective and
Page 163 and 164:
eference to Allius’ funeral is po
Page 165 and 166:
Alternatively, it could be assumed
Page 167 and 168:
the island of the cattle of the Sun
Page 169 and 170:
fletu This verbal noun is well-esta
Page 171 and 172:
Culex 123f. primum prona surgebant
Page 173 and 174:
valley as if it were a slope than t
Page 175 and 176:
It remains to consider the rest of
Page 177 and 178:
prefers to follow O and writes uiat
Page 179 and 180:
pronoun (‘this man’), as this w
Page 181 and 182:
clausum Fordyce is probably right t
Page 183 and 184:
characterize the gift and not the g
Page 185 and 186:
far from the transmitted text, and
Page 187 and 188:
the Elder, N.H. 17.134 cum sit mutu
Page 189 and 190:
eloved as a goddess: thus Pl. Bacch
Page 191 and 192:
significantly different from the pr
Page 193 and 194:
511.65. constituo is not used elsew
Page 195 and 196:
exist in Latin, to -au-, which did;
Page 197 and 198:
77f. Catullus interrupts his narrat
Page 199 and 200:
ieiuna … desideret ara The altar
Page 201 and 202:
85f. The Parcae knew that Laodamia
Page 203 and 204:
y this time. Argiuus, meaning not o
Page 205 and 206:
Meillet s.v. cinis), but the Italia
Page 207 and 208:
that might simply be because it is
Page 209 and 210:
cognatos … cineres Enallage: ‘r
Page 211 and 212:
should be attached to the orthograp
Page 213 and 214:
were using the aspirated forms (Ora
Page 215 and 216:
109 quale Here and at 111 quod the
Page 217 and 218:
Stymphalia monstra ‘The Stymphali
Page 219 and 220:
altior illo, / qui … , which woul
Page 221 and 222:
First, it is hard to see how the ne
Page 223 and 224:
et flumina uim minuerunt and 6.645
Page 225 and 226:
126 improbius ‘More shamelessly
Page 227 and 228: 1549 - see Nomenclator 96), whose a
Page 229 and 230: garments, and the colours croceus a
Page 231 and 232: prose it is replaced by tametsi. It
Page 233 and 234: eassuring environment, with the win
Page 235 and 236: (Theb. 7x, Ach. 1x, Silu. 1x), Juve
Page 237 and 238: omniuoli This hapax legomenon is su
Page 239 and 240: this line at himself. But why shoul
Page 241 and 242: (Fordyce), nor is there any need to
Page 243 and 244: Consequently I do not think that on
Page 245 and 246: (1958: 103) and Trappes-Lomax (2007
Page 247 and 248: Trappes-Lomax (2007: 244) notes tha
Page 249 and 250: to diuus (7x against 2x), in the lo
Page 251 and 252: All these supplements presuppose th
Page 253 and 254: directed to God the Creator. He cou
Page 255 and 256: transdidi used by Fronto (Epist. p.
Page 257 and 258: for a shipwrecked man but must be a
Page 259 and 260: the previous and the following dist
Page 261 and 262: would have never wanted to say that
Page 263 and 264: conjecture and proposed another rec
Page 265 and 266: 5) Agius 75-78 uos nostis, quanta i
Page 267 and 268: APPENDIX II: CATULLUS’ SOURCES FO
Page 269 and 270: Catullus calls Protesilaus’ house
Page 271 and 272: BIBLIOGRAPHY A note on references C
Page 273 and 274: PLM Aemilius Baehrens ed. (1879-188
Page 275 and 276: G Catulle, Manuscrit de St-Germain-
Page 277: Hartman, J.J. (1916), ‘De Catulli
Page 281 and 282: Newman, John Kevin (1990), Roman Ca
Page 283 and 284: Berry, D.H. (1996), Cicero: Pro P.
Page 285 and 286: Graziosi Acquaro, Maria Teresa (197
Page 287 and 288: Pomey, Patrice (1997), ‘Les dange
Page 289: --- (1929), ‘Sepulcri Portuensis
show all

CATULLUS 68 - Scuola Normale Superiore

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?