CATULLUS 68 - Scuola Normale Superiore

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Tuplin, C.J. (1981), ‘Catullus 68’, CQ 31, 113-139. Bright, David F. (1982), ‘Allius and Allia’, RhM 125, 138-140. Jenkyns, Richard (1982), Three Classical Poets: Sappho, Catullus, and Juvenal (London). – At 89f. Papanghelis, T.D. (1982), ‘A Note on Catullus 68.156-157’, QUCC n.s. 11, 139-149. Brenk, Frederick E. (1983), ‘Lesbia’s arguta solea : 68.72 and Greek λιγύς’, Glotta 61, 234-236. Fredricksmeyer, E.A. (1983), ‘Catullus 51 and 68.51-6 : An Observation’, CPh 78, 42-45. Sarkissian, John (1983), Catullus 68: An Interpretation (Leiden). Shipton, K.M.W. (1983), ‘A House in the City: Catullus 68.68’, Latomus 42, 869-876. Whitaker, Richard (1983), Myth and Personal Experience in Roman Love-Elegy. A Study in Poetic Technique (Göttingen). – Esp. 59-62. Woodman, A.J. (1983), ‘A Reading of Catullus 68A’, PCPhS n.s. 29, 100-106. Hubbard, Thomas K. (1984), ‘Catullus 68. The Text as Self-Demystification’, Arethusa 17, 29-49. Németh, Béla (1984), ‘Communes exerceremus amores, Catullus 68.69’, ACD 20, 43-47. – At 43f. Skinner, Marilyn B. (1984), ‘Rhamnusia Virgo’, ClAnt 3, 134-141. Capponi, Filippo (1984/85), ‘Note filologiche’, QCTC 2-3, 17-34. – At 17-20 on 68.157. Cavallini, Eleonora (1984/85), ‘Catullus 68.70ss.’, MCr 19-20, 191. Giardina, Gian Carlo (1984/85), ‘Note a Catullo’, MCr 19-20, 193-197. – At 194-196. Courtney, E. (1985), ‘Three poems of Catullus: (3). Catullus 68 and Its Compositional Scheme’, BICS 32, 92-100. Ferguson, John (1985), Catullus (Lawrence, Kansas). At 225-234. Poliakoff, Michael (1985), ‘Clumsy and Clever Spiders on Hermann’s Bridge (Catullus 68.49-50; Culex 1- 3)’, Glotta 53, 248-250. Rambaux, Claude (1985), Trois analyses de l’amour. Catulle: Poésies, Ovide: Les Amours; Apulée: Le conte de Psyché (Paris). – At 44-47. Schilling, R. (1985), ‘La paronomasie domum-dominus dans l’élégie 68 de Catulle’, AFLNice 50, 284-291. Schmidt, Ernst A. (1985), Catull (Heidelberg). – Esp. 95-101. Shipton, K.M.W. (1985a), ‘Catullus 68 and the Myth of Agamemnon’, Latomus 44, 55-71. --- (1985b), ‘A successful kômos in Catullus’, Latomus 44, 503-520. Allen, Archibald (1986), ‘Sacrificial Negligence in Catullus’, Latomus 45, 861-863. Lain, Norbert F. (1986), ‘Catullus 68.145’, HSCPh 90, 155-158. Brenk, Frederick E. (1987), ‘Arguta solea on the Threshold : The Literary Precedents of Catullus, 68, 68-72’, QUCC n.s. 26, 121-127. Forsyth, P.Y. (1987), ‘Muneraque et Musarum hinc petis et Veneris: Catullus 68A.10’, CW 80, 177-180. Shipton, K.M.W. (1987), ‘No Alternative to Ceremonial Negligence (Catullus 68.73ff.)’, SO 62, 51-68. Ferguson, John (1988), Catullus (Oxford). – At 36f. Heath, Malcolm (1988), ‘Catullus 68b’, LCM 13, 117-119. Milanese, G. (1988), ‘Non possum reticere (Catullus 68a, 41), Aevum antiquum 1, 261-264. 280
Newman, John Kevin (1990), Roman Catullus and the Modification of the Alexandrian Sensibility (Hildesheim). – At 228-243. Powell, J.G.F. (1990), ‘Two Notes on Catullus’, CQ n.s. 40, 199-206. – At 202-206 on 68.27-30. Syndikus, Hans Peter (1990), Catull: eine Interpretation. Zweiter Teil: Die großen Gedichte (61-68) (Darmstadt). – At 239-246. Allen, Archibald (1991), ‘Domus data ablataque: Catullus 68.157’, QUCC n.s. 37, 101-106. Edwards, M.J. (1991), ‘The Theology of Catullus 68b’, Antike und Abendland 37, 68-81. Lefèvre, Eckard (1991), ‘Was hatte Catull in der Kapsel, die er von Rom nach Verona mitnahm? Zu Aufbau und Aussage der Allius-Elegie’, RhM 134, 311-326. Arkins, Brian (1992), ‘Two Notes on Catullus: I 68.145; II Crucial constants in Catullus: Callimachus, the Muses, friends and enemies’, LCM 17, 115-118. – At 115f. Fear, Trevor (1992), ‘Veronae Turpe, Catulle, Esse’, ICS 17, 245-263. Feeney, Denis C. (1992), ‘Shall I Compare Thee …? Catullus 68B and the Limits of Analogy’, in: Author and Audience in Latin Literature, ed. Tony Woodman & Jonathan Powell (Cambridge), 33-44. Simpson, C.J. (1992), ‘A Note on Catullus 68a, 14f.’, LCM 17, 12. Fear, Trevor (1993), ‘Another Note on Catullus 68a.34f.’, LCM 18, 4. Janan, Micaela (1994), “When the Lamp is Shattered”: Desire and Narrative in Catullus (Carbondale and Edwardsville, Ill.). – At 112-142. Simpson, C.J. (1994), ‘Unnecessary Homosexuality. The Correspondent’s Request in Catullus 68A’, Latomus 53, 564-569. Clauss, James J. (1995), ‘A Delicate Foot on the Well-Worn Threshold: Paradoxical Imagery in Catullus 68b’, AJPh 116, 237-253. Delvigo, Maria Luisa (1995), ‘Ambiguità dell’emendatio: edizioni, riedizioni, edizioni postume’, in: Pecere and Reeve (1995), 7-38. – At 28f. Casali, Sergio (1996), ‘Il letto celibe: ‘Mallio’, Laodamia, e l’unità di Catullo 68’, RFIC 124, 440-444. Ackroyd-Cross, B.G. (1997), ‘Catullus 68, 41-86’ [misprinted for ‘... 41-66’], in: Carl Deroux ed., Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History VIII (Bruxelles), 116-121. Dettmer, Helena (1997), Love by the Numbers. Form and the Meaning in the Poetry of Catullus (New York). – At 134-139 and 148-150. Arkins, Brian (1999), An Interpretation of the Poems of Catullus (Lampeter). 81ff. Jackson, Giorgio (1999), ‘Catullo 68, 109 (= 69)’, Vichiana ser. IV, 1.2, 39-46. Kennedy, Duncan (1999), ‘ ‘Cf.’: Analogies, Relationships and Catullus 68’, in: Susanna Morton Braund and Roland Mayer edd., amor: roma – Love & Latin Literature ... (Cambridge), 30-43. E. Vandiver (2000), ‘Hot Springs, Cool Rivers, and Hidden Fires: Heracles in Catullus 68.51-66’, CPh 95, 151-159. Holzberg, Niklas (2002), Catull: Der Dichter und sein erotisches Werk (München). – At 163-172. 281
Page 1 and 2:
CATULLUS 68 Edited with an Introduc
Page 3 and 4:
Bei irgendeinem Spätling muß doch
Page 5 and 6:
the first place. As a result of all
Page 7 and 8:
When I started working on this volu
Page 9 and 10:
CONTENTS PREFACE ..................
Page 11 and 12:
At first sight, this debate could a
Page 13 and 14:
so that one would not have to look
Page 15 and 16:
least, non utriusque in line 39 cou
Page 17 and 18:
artistic unity of the poem ...” 2
Page 19 and 20:
can only claim that an expression s
Page 21 and 22:
later than the 6 th century A.D., a
Page 23 and 24:
(c) Carmen 68 is unitary and concer
Page 25 and 26:
Morgan is a separatist, while Lachm
Page 27 and 28:
This solution was proposed by Frank
Page 29 and 30:
(S 3) Lines 20 and 22-24 are repeat
Page 31 and 32:
(S 5) In lines 1-40 Catullus says h
Page 33 and 34:
in that of 1973 or in his 1988 revi
Page 35 and 36:
address in poem 68 for a number of
Page 37 and 38:
(1) R 2 (Coluccio Salutati) has add
Page 39 and 40:
whether the evidence at our disposa
Page 41 and 42:
later Torquatus tried unsuccessfull
Page 43 and 44:
68a that may support such an identi
Page 45 and 46:
straightforward Yes or No. In short
Page 47 and 48:
from a private letter. This could b
Page 49 and 50:
desertum in line 6). The second pai
Page 51 and 52:
I propose a twofold solution. There
Page 53 and 54:
***** Does Catullus reject both Man
Page 55 and 56:
some sort of practical contribution
Page 57 and 58:
methods and ideals of the doctus po
Page 59 and 60:
If a wealthy Roman male 122 was des
Page 61 and 62:
friends appear to have found romant
Page 63 and 64:
CATULLUS 68B ‘Goddesses, I cannot
Page 65 and 66:
There is space for disagreement abo
Page 67 and 68:
to be rather flexible; evidently Ca
Page 69 and 70:
loc.) - but here too it is not clea
Page 71 and 72:
and Lesbia. Twenty-five years have
Page 73 and 74:
One is the theme of human and divin
Page 75 and 76:
his exemplar from those that he mad
Page 77 and 78:
have been using not the archetype,
Page 79 and 80:
The apparatus criticus I should cla
Page 81 and 82:
It has been hard to decide whether
Page 83 and 84:
38 Hamburg - Stadt- und Universitä
Page 85 and 86:
CATULLI CARMEN LXVIIIA Quod mihi fo
Page 87 and 88:
nam mihi quam dederit duplex Amathu
Page 89 and 90:
ne Paris abducta gauisus libera moe
Page 91 and 92:
huc addant diui quam plurima, quae
Page 93 and 94:
poem through several stages of tran
Page 95 and 96:
mihi mitto ‘to send’, ‘to hav
Page 97 and 98:
daughter Tullia (Erskine 1997). Cic
Page 99 and 100:
Να⌠ακο⎜ω ≥δη, δεσ
Page 101 and 102:
spumantibus exspuit undis This expr
Page 103 and 104:
A somewhat peculiar interpretation
Page 105 and 106:
Prop. 1.8.33 and Tib. 1.1.43; terra
Page 107 and 108:
In the present passage caelibe evid
Page 109 and 110:
contemporaries; and it made Catullu
Page 111 and 112:
10 ‘… and that (it is) from her
Page 113 and 114:
• Theognis 249f. ο⎡ξ 〈ππ
Page 115 and 116:
• Solon frg. 26 West ƒργα δ
Page 117 and 118:
position to give them; he implies t
Page 119 and 120:
Ellis (ad loc.), Schöll (1880: 473
Page 121 and 122:
15-26 ‘I had my share of amorous
Page 123 and 124:
man (and a Roman citizen), that is,
Page 125 and 126:
actions (compare the plural of demo
Page 127 and 128:
would not have been taken over into
Page 129 and 130:
comedy (Pl. Curc. 697, Men. 1133, A
Page 131 and 132:
their own (see on sepulta in the pr
Page 133 and 134:
not] employ the offensively hyperbo
Page 135 and 136:
closer to turpe. This would be an e
Page 137 and 138:
quid agis? ...’). In general, scr
Page 139 and 140:
frigida ... membra Since erotic fer
Page 141 and 142:
29. What is ‘sad rather than sham
Page 143 and 144:
introduces a new point that is in s
Page 145 and 146:
1955 on Verg. Aen. 4.2, and cfr. Ca
Page 147 and 148:
you both, if I had any to hand.’
Page 149 and 150:
unius tantum ‘only of one’? Ove
Page 151 and 152:
without any hint that the investmen
Page 153 and 154:
68B: IN PRAISE OF ALLIUS 41-50 ‘G
Page 155 and 156:
are solved by Scaliger’s brillian
Page 157 and 158:
me’ is a much more suitable expre
Page 159 and 160:
monument (Fordyce), which is the pl
Page 161 and 162:
What makes the image effective and
Page 163 and 164:
eference to Allius’ funeral is po
Page 165 and 166:
Alternatively, it could be assumed
Page 167 and 168:
the island of the cattle of the Sun
Page 169 and 170:
fletu This verbal noun is well-esta
Page 171 and 172:
Culex 123f. primum prona surgebant
Page 173 and 174:
valley as if it were a slope than t
Page 175 and 176:
It remains to consider the rest of
Page 177 and 178:
prefers to follow O and writes uiat
Page 179 and 180:
pronoun (‘this man’), as this w
Page 181 and 182:
clausum Fordyce is probably right t
Page 183 and 184:
characterize the gift and not the g
Page 185 and 186:
far from the transmitted text, and
Page 187 and 188:
the Elder, N.H. 17.134 cum sit mutu
Page 189 and 190:
eloved as a goddess: thus Pl. Bacch
Page 191 and 192:
significantly different from the pr
Page 193 and 194:
511.65. constituo is not used elsew
Page 195 and 196:
exist in Latin, to -au-, which did;
Page 197 and 198:
77f. Catullus interrupts his narrat
Page 199 and 200:
ieiuna … desideret ara The altar
Page 201 and 202:
85f. The Parcae knew that Laodamia
Page 203 and 204:
y this time. Argiuus, meaning not o
Page 205 and 206:
Meillet s.v. cinis), but the Italia
Page 207 and 208:
that might simply be because it is
Page 209 and 210:
cognatos … cineres Enallage: ‘r
Page 211 and 212:
should be attached to the orthograp
Page 213 and 214:
were using the aspirated forms (Ora
Page 215 and 216:
109 quale Here and at 111 quod the
Page 217 and 218:
Stymphalia monstra ‘The Stymphali
Page 219 and 220:
altior illo, / qui … , which woul
Page 221 and 222:
First, it is hard to see how the ne
Page 223 and 224:
et flumina uim minuerunt and 6.645
Page 225 and 226:
126 improbius ‘More shamelessly
Page 227 and 228:
1549 - see Nomenclator 96), whose a
Page 229 and 230: garments, and the colours croceus a
Page 231 and 232: prose it is replaced by tametsi. It
Page 233 and 234: eassuring environment, with the win
Page 235 and 236: (Theb. 7x, Ach. 1x, Silu. 1x), Juve
Page 237 and 238: omniuoli This hapax legomenon is su
Page 239 and 240: this line at himself. But why shoul
Page 241 and 242: (Fordyce), nor is there any need to
Page 243 and 244: Consequently I do not think that on
Page 245 and 246: (1958: 103) and Trappes-Lomax (2007
Page 247 and 248: Trappes-Lomax (2007: 244) notes tha
Page 249 and 250: to diuus (7x against 2x), in the lo
Page 251 and 252: All these supplements presuppose th
Page 253 and 254: directed to God the Creator. He cou
Page 255 and 256: transdidi used by Fronto (Epist. p.
Page 257 and 258: for a shipwrecked man but must be a
Page 259 and 260: the previous and the following dist
Page 261 and 262: would have never wanted to say that
Page 263 and 264: conjecture and proposed another rec
Page 265 and 266: 5) Agius 75-78 uos nostis, quanta i
Page 267 and 268: APPENDIX II: CATULLUS’ SOURCES FO
Page 269 and 270: Catullus calls Protesilaus’ house
Page 271 and 272: BIBLIOGRAPHY A note on references C
Page 273 and 274: PLM Aemilius Baehrens ed. (1879-188
Page 275 and 276: G Catulle, Manuscrit de St-Germain-
Page 277 and 278: Hartman, J.J. (1916), ‘De Catulli
Page 279: Heine, Rolf (1975), ‘Zu Catull c.
Page 283 and 284: Berry, D.H. (1996), Cicero: Pro P.
Page 285 and 286: Graziosi Acquaro, Maria Teresa (197
Page 287 and 288: Pomey, Patrice (1997), ‘Les dange
Page 289: --- (1929), ‘Sepulcri Portuensis
show all

CATULLUS 68 - Scuola Normale Superiore

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?