10.04.2013 Views

101 Myths of the Bible: how ancient scribes - Conscious Evolution TV

101 Myths of the Bible: how ancient scribes - Conscious Evolution TV

101 Myths of the Bible: how ancient scribes - Conscious Evolution TV

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Myths</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Beginning 77<br />

In <strong>the</strong> above scenario, Ham had previously seen his fa<strong>the</strong>r naked and told his two<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r bro<strong>the</strong>rs what he saw. The o<strong>the</strong>r two bro<strong>the</strong>rs <strong>the</strong>n covered <strong>the</strong>ir fa<strong>the</strong>r. But,<br />

when Noah awoke he cursed“his younger son,” Canaan, not Ham, who had seen him<br />

naked. Since this occurs shortly after Noah and his family came <strong>of</strong>f <strong>the</strong> ark, where did<br />

this Canaan come from and <strong>how</strong> could he be old enough to cause such mischief unless<br />

he had also been on <strong>the</strong> ark?<br />

Lest <strong>the</strong>re be any confusion that <strong>the</strong> author mistakenly substituted Ham for<br />

Canaan as <strong>the</strong> youngest child, we should note that on all <strong>the</strong> occasions when <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bible</strong><br />

mentions Noah’s three sons toge<strong>the</strong>r, Ham’s name appears in second place. This<br />

would have been a literary formula intended to convey to <strong>the</strong> reader that Ham was <strong>the</strong><br />

middle son, not <strong>the</strong> youngest.<br />

Who fa<strong>the</strong>red Canaan: Noah or Ham? Some confusion must have surrounded<br />

this issue because somewhere along <strong>the</strong> way at least one biblical editor felt it necessary<br />

to repeatedly stress that Ham was <strong>the</strong> fa<strong>the</strong>r. The confusion stemmed from <strong>the</strong> fact<br />

that in <strong>the</strong> Hermopolitan tradition all four males on <strong>the</strong> ark were <strong>the</strong> fa<strong>the</strong>rs <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

same child and this didn’t make sense to <strong>the</strong> mono<strong>the</strong>istic Hebrews in later times. The<br />

question <strong>of</strong> parentage had to be re-examined.<br />

The identification <strong>of</strong> Ham as fa<strong>the</strong>r <strong>of</strong> Canaan would have been a late development,<br />

well into <strong>the</strong> period <strong>of</strong> Hebrew monarchy (see Myth #45). It originated from<br />

<strong>the</strong> idea that <strong>the</strong> land <strong>of</strong> Egypt (i.e., Ham) fa<strong>the</strong>red <strong>the</strong> land <strong>of</strong> Canaan, a belief<br />

reflected in Genesis 10, which purports to trace <strong>the</strong> origins <strong>of</strong> nations after <strong>the</strong> flood.<br />

This suggests that Canaan originally had a different name, one that reflected his<br />

connection to <strong>the</strong> solar god Re in his form as a child. (Re had many different names.<br />

One litany lists at least seventy-five.) That would explain why Noah cursed Canaan<br />

instead <strong>of</strong> Ham. Canaan originally represented <strong>the</strong> god Re, <strong>the</strong> Hermopolitan Creator<br />

deity, and Hebrew priests needed to diminish <strong>the</strong> influence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Egyptian Re on<br />

<strong>the</strong> beliefs <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> early Hebrew refugees from Egypt.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!