10.04.2013 Views

101 Myths of the Bible: how ancient scribes - Conscious Evolution TV

101 Myths of the Bible: how ancient scribes - Conscious Evolution TV

101 Myths of the Bible: how ancient scribes - Conscious Evolution TV

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

26 <strong>101</strong> <strong>Myths</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bible</strong><br />

scholars have assumed that <strong>the</strong> word for clay became a metaphor for man. In fact, <strong>the</strong>re<br />

are a couple <strong>of</strong> non-biblical references to indicate that such might be <strong>the</strong> case but this<br />

is limited to a handful <strong>of</strong> personal names found in texts in <strong>the</strong> library <strong>of</strong> <strong>ancient</strong> Ugarit<br />

and dating to about <strong>the</strong> fourteenth century B.C. We have no general evidence <strong>of</strong> any<br />

widespread use in Semitic tongues for <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> adam to mean“man.”<br />

The problem here is that <strong>the</strong> Hebrew <strong>scribes</strong> adopted this idea that man was<br />

formed in <strong>the</strong> image <strong>of</strong> God from Egyptian traditions. That belief remained with <strong>the</strong><br />

Israelites throughout <strong>the</strong>ir history but, because <strong>the</strong>y didn’t believe in any form <strong>of</strong><br />

physical representation <strong>of</strong> deity, by <strong>the</strong> time that Genesis assumed its final written<br />

form, <strong>the</strong> concept <strong>of</strong> an “image <strong>of</strong> god” no longer had a specific meaning.<br />

To trace <strong>the</strong> concept back to its roots, look at <strong>the</strong> Egyptians’ view. The Egyptians<br />

believed both that humanity was created in <strong>the</strong> image <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Creator and that <strong>the</strong> Creator<br />

had both male and female characteristics. A passage from an <strong>ancient</strong> text known<br />

as The Instruction Book for Merikare, illustrates <strong>the</strong> first principle.<br />

Well tended is mankind—god’s cattle.<br />

He made sky and earth for <strong>the</strong>ir sake<br />

He subdued <strong>the</strong> water monster,<br />

He made breath for <strong>the</strong>ir noses to live.<br />

They are his images, who came from his body.<br />

Note <strong>the</strong> parallel here to <strong>the</strong> biblical passage, where it talks not only about<br />

humanity being in <strong>the</strong> image <strong>of</strong> god, but also incorporates both male and female<br />

within <strong>the</strong> image.<br />

This text apparently had wide circulation in Egypt. It dates originally to <strong>the</strong><br />

twenty-first century B.C. and <strong>the</strong> present form <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> text cited here comes from a<br />

papyrus written during <strong>the</strong> New Kingdom period, several centuries later. Hebrew<br />

<strong>scribes</strong> in Egypt almost certainly would have been familiar with <strong>the</strong> ideas expressed.<br />

While Egyptians had several ideas about <strong>how</strong> humans were created, this particular<br />

version indicates that men and women were parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> body <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Creator and it<br />

is in this sense that humanity had <strong>the</strong> image <strong>of</strong> a god. Several texts also s<strong>how</strong> that <strong>the</strong><br />

Creator incorporated both male and female characteristics, explaining <strong>how</strong> both male<br />

and female forms could come from <strong>the</strong> same source.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!