10.04.2013 Views

101 Myths of the Bible: how ancient scribes - Conscious Evolution TV

101 Myths of the Bible: how ancient scribes - Conscious Evolution TV

101 Myths of the Bible: how ancient scribes - Conscious Evolution TV

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

yth #21:<br />

Adam would die if he ate from <strong>the</strong> Tree <strong>of</strong> Knowledge.<br />

The Myth: But <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> tree <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge <strong>of</strong> good and evil, thou shalt not eat <strong>of</strong><br />

it: for in <strong>the</strong> day that thou eatest <strong>the</strong>re<strong>of</strong> thou shalt surely die. (Gen. 2:17)<br />

The Reality: The purpose <strong>of</strong> this story is to condemn <strong>the</strong> Egyptian idea that<br />

knowledge <strong>of</strong> moral order would lead to Eternal Life, which conflicted with Hebrew<br />

mono<strong>the</strong>istic teachings.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> previous myth, we saw that Egyptian ideas about <strong>the</strong> relationship between<br />

moral order and eternal life lay behind <strong>the</strong> biblical story about <strong>the</strong> Tree <strong>of</strong> Knowledge<br />

<strong>of</strong> Good and Evil and <strong>the</strong> Tree <strong>of</strong> Life. Yet, despite <strong>the</strong> close parallels between <strong>the</strong><br />

two descriptions, <strong>the</strong>re is one glaring conflict. In <strong>the</strong> Egyptian text, Nun (<strong>the</strong> personification<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Great flood) urged Atum (<strong>the</strong> Heliopolitan Creator) to eat <strong>of</strong> his<br />

daughter Tefnut, giving him access to knowledge <strong>of</strong> moral order. In Genesis, God forbade<br />

Adam to eat from <strong>the</strong> Tree <strong>of</strong> Knowledge <strong>of</strong> Good and Evil, denying him access<br />

to moral knowledge.<br />

This inconsistency appears in <strong>the</strong> face <strong>of</strong> a moral conundrum in <strong>the</strong> biblical<br />

account. It would seem that God lied and <strong>the</strong> serpent told <strong>the</strong> truth. Initially, God<br />

ordered Adam not to eat from The Tree <strong>of</strong> Knowledge, telling him that he would die<br />

on <strong>the</strong> very day that he did so. Yet, later, after eating from <strong>the</strong> fruit <strong>of</strong> this tree, Adam<br />

not only lived (for about ano<strong>the</strong>r nine hundred years), but God feared that he would<br />

obtain eternal life if he ate from <strong>the</strong> Tree <strong>of</strong> Life and it became necessary to expel him<br />

from <strong>the</strong> Garden.<br />

If Genesis draws upon <strong>the</strong> Egyptian doctrine, why does <strong>the</strong> biblical story take such<br />

a radical turn when it comes to eating from <strong>the</strong> Tree <strong>of</strong> Knowledge? The divergence in<br />

<strong>the</strong> two stories results from fundamental differences between Egyptian and Hebrew<br />

beliefs about <strong>the</strong> afterlife.<br />

The Egyptians believed that if you lived a life <strong>of</strong> moral order, <strong>the</strong> god Osiris, who<br />

ruled over <strong>the</strong> afterlife, would award you eternal life. That was <strong>the</strong> philosophical link<br />

51

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!