10.04.2013 Views

101 Myths of the Bible: how ancient scribes - Conscious Evolution TV

101 Myths of the Bible: how ancient scribes - Conscious Evolution TV

101 Myths of the Bible: how ancient scribes - Conscious Evolution TV

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

104 <strong>101</strong> <strong>Myths</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bible</strong><br />

Libya, and Cepheus <strong>of</strong> Ethiopia, but ruling in J<strong>of</strong>fa in Canaan. The fourth son,<br />

Phineas, has a name meaning Ethiopian.<br />

Belus and Ham share a number <strong>of</strong> characteristics.<br />

1. Belus is <strong>the</strong> son <strong>of</strong> Poseidon, god <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> oceans, and Ham is <strong>the</strong> son <strong>of</strong> Noah,<br />

who is not only <strong>the</strong> survivor <strong>of</strong> a worldwide flood, but has been identified herein<br />

with Nun, an Egyptian equivalent to Poseidon.<br />

2. Each is <strong>the</strong> fa<strong>the</strong>r <strong>of</strong> four sons, three <strong>of</strong> whom are identified with Egypt,<br />

Ethiopia, and Libya.<br />

3. Belus’s fourth son, Cepheus, is sometimes identified as a Canaanite king and<br />

Ham’s fourth son corresponds to Canaan.<br />

4. Belus is portrayed as <strong>the</strong> bro<strong>the</strong>r <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> King <strong>of</strong> Canaan while Ham, his biblical<br />

counterpart, appears as <strong>the</strong> fa<strong>the</strong>r <strong>of</strong> Canaan. However, <strong>the</strong> biblical genealogy is<br />

ambiguous and, as we saw earlier in Myth #33, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bible</strong> at times suggests that<br />

Canaan was <strong>the</strong> bro<strong>the</strong>r <strong>of</strong> Ham ra<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong> son.<br />

Although <strong>the</strong> genealogical structure between <strong>the</strong> two family trees is almost identical,<br />

<strong>the</strong>re is one significant difference in emphasis. Genesis relates <strong>the</strong> genealogy to <strong>the</strong><br />

evolution <strong>of</strong> mankind immediately after worldwide destruction. The Greek myth is<br />

simply couched in geopolitical symbolism. Never<strong>the</strong>less, it s<strong>how</strong>s an early tradition in<br />

which Egypt appeared as <strong>the</strong> bro<strong>the</strong>r <strong>of</strong> Libya, Ethiopia, and Canaan.<br />

Finally, we should note that <strong>the</strong> Greek Danoi, who disappeared from <strong>the</strong> historical<br />

record by <strong>the</strong> first millennium B.C., were one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> “Sea Peoples,” a group <strong>of</strong> Greek<br />

allies (among whom were <strong>the</strong> Philistines) who invaded Canaan in <strong>the</strong> thirteenth and<br />

twelfth centuries B.C., about <strong>the</strong> same time that Israel settled <strong>the</strong>re after <strong>the</strong> Exodus<br />

from Egypt. This would suggest that <strong>the</strong> Greeks brought <strong>the</strong> myth into Canaan<br />

where Hebrew <strong>scribes</strong> picked it up and incorporated it into <strong>the</strong>ir world history.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!