10.04.2013 Views

101 Myths of the Bible: how ancient scribes - Conscious Evolution TV

101 Myths of the Bible: how ancient scribes - Conscious Evolution TV

101 Myths of the Bible: how ancient scribes - Conscious Evolution TV

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

xviii <strong>101</strong> <strong>Myths</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bible</strong><br />

J may have originated as early as <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> King David (c. early-tenth century<br />

B.C.) but since many <strong>of</strong> its <strong>the</strong>mes reflect <strong>the</strong> conflict between Judah and Israel after<br />

Solomon’s death, its origin was more likely sometime after <strong>the</strong> split between Judah and<br />

Israel (late-tenth century B.C.) and before <strong>the</strong> Assyrian conquest and destruction <strong>of</strong><br />

Israel in 722 B.C.<br />

The E and P Sources<br />

In <strong>the</strong> early stages <strong>of</strong> research into <strong>the</strong> documentary origins <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bible</strong>, <strong>the</strong> Elohist<br />

source known as E revolved around those stories that used Elohim as <strong>the</strong> name <strong>of</strong><br />

God. Fur<strong>the</strong>r analysis s<strong>how</strong>ed that E actually consisted <strong>of</strong> at least two separate source<br />

documents, each <strong>of</strong> which used Elohim for <strong>the</strong> name <strong>of</strong> God but which had very different<br />

viewpoints. This second source embedded within E concerned itself primarily<br />

with priestly concerns and rituals, and precise dating, numbers, and measurements.<br />

Because <strong>of</strong> its focus, it was called <strong>the</strong> P or Priestly source.<br />

While <strong>the</strong> deity in E exhibits anthropomorphic characteristics similar to J, <strong>the</strong><br />

deity in P is amorphous, distant, and alo<strong>of</strong>. Where <strong>the</strong> anthropomorphic deity carries<br />

on discussions with humans, <strong>the</strong> P deity engages in no such interaction.<br />

E is generally accepted as older than P but perhaps younger than J. It most likely<br />

dates to before <strong>the</strong> Assyrian conquest. The Elohist writer focuses on events and<br />

<strong>the</strong>mes centered on <strong>the</strong> kingdom <strong>of</strong> Israel, and counters historical claims made by J. In<br />

E, for example, <strong>the</strong> covenant between God and Israel flows from Jacob to Joseph to<br />

Ephraim, whose territory served as <strong>the</strong> capital <strong>of</strong> Israel after <strong>the</strong> split between <strong>the</strong> two<br />

Hebrew kingdoms. E strongly promotes Moses as <strong>the</strong> national hero and focuses more<br />

on his deeds than on events in <strong>the</strong> earlier patriarchal period. E is less concerned with<br />

religious orthodoxy than ei<strong>the</strong>r J or P. The E history begins in <strong>the</strong> patriarchal period<br />

after <strong>the</strong> flood and has nothing to say about Creation.<br />

Many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> doublets in E and J reflect <strong>the</strong> political and religious propaganda wars<br />

between Israel and Judah after those two nations split apart. Judah believed in a strong<br />

centralized authority ruling out <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> capital in Jerusalem, with <strong>the</strong> king functioning<br />

as a powerful authoritarian monarch. E, comprising a coalition <strong>of</strong> several states (<strong>the</strong>oretically<br />

encompassing ten tribes), favored a highly decentralized political and religious

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!