10.04.2013 Views

101 Myths of the Bible: how ancient scribes - Conscious Evolution TV

101 Myths of the Bible: how ancient scribes - Conscious Evolution TV

101 Myths of the Bible: how ancient scribes - Conscious Evolution TV

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

yth #45:<br />

The sons <strong>of</strong> Noah formed <strong>the</strong> nations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> world.<br />

The Myth: These are <strong>the</strong> families <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sons <strong>of</strong> Noah, after <strong>the</strong>ir generations, in<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir nations: and by <strong>the</strong>se were <strong>the</strong> nations divided in <strong>the</strong> earth after <strong>the</strong> flood.<br />

(Gen. 10:32)<br />

The Reality: The list <strong>of</strong> nations attributed to Noah’s family is a late addition to<br />

Genesis, reflecting political relationships in <strong>the</strong> early first millennium B.C.<br />

Genesis 10 lists <strong>the</strong> three branches <strong>of</strong> Noah’s genealogical tree, one for each <strong>of</strong> his<br />

three sons. The <strong>Bible</strong> implies that each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> children mentioned corresponds to<br />

some geographical entity. These lists usually are referred to as <strong>the</strong> “Table <strong>of</strong> Nations”<br />

or“Family <strong>of</strong> Nations.”<br />

Several <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> names on <strong>the</strong> list correspond to known territories or peoples but <strong>the</strong><br />

vast majority <strong>of</strong> names cannot be linked easily to o<strong>the</strong>r specific entities. Most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se<br />

unrecognizable place-names are usually classified as belonging to tribes <strong>of</strong> Arabia.<br />

This presents <strong>the</strong> somewhat puzzling situation <strong>of</strong> having a biblical Table <strong>of</strong> Nations<br />

overloaded with obscure Arabian tribes having virtually no impact on biblical history.<br />

In broad terms, <strong>the</strong> three branches represent three main geographical areas. Ham<br />

and his family correspond to Africa and Canaan; Shem and his family correspond to<br />

<strong>the</strong> Near East; Japheth and his family correspond loosely to <strong>the</strong> island nations in <strong>the</strong><br />

Mediterranean and parts <strong>of</strong> Europe.<br />

One difficulty with accepting Noah’s genealogy as a Table <strong>of</strong> Nations is <strong>the</strong> presence<br />

<strong>of</strong> duplicate names in <strong>the</strong> list. Havilah, for example, appears as a son <strong>of</strong> Cush (i.e.,<br />

Ethiopia) in <strong>the</strong> Ham branch and as a son <strong>of</strong> Joktan in <strong>the</strong> Shem branch, locating <strong>the</strong><br />

territory simultaneously in both Africa and Asia.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> same vein, Sheba appears as both a grandson <strong>of</strong> Cush and as a son <strong>of</strong> Joktan.<br />

Cush also has a bro<strong>the</strong>r named Seba. Seba is philologically identical to Sheba.<br />

Ano<strong>the</strong>r form <strong>of</strong> duplication occurs with <strong>the</strong> names <strong>of</strong> Lud, a son <strong>of</strong> Shem, and<br />

Ludim, a grandson <strong>of</strong> Ham. In Hebrew, <strong>the</strong> im ending signifies a plural form. When<br />

99

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!