Program - Society of Toxicology
Program - Society of Toxicology
Program - Society of Toxicology
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Society</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Toxicology</strong> 2011<br />
<strong>Program</strong> Description (Continued)<br />
Abstract #<br />
Monday Afternoon, March 7<br />
12:00 NOON to 1:20 PM<br />
Salon G<br />
(Ticket Required)<br />
Monday Afternoon<br />
In Vitro <strong>Toxicology</strong> Lecture and Luncheon for<br />
Students: Full Speed into an Alternative<br />
Future<br />
Lecturer: Robert E. Chapin, Pfizer, Groton, CT.<br />
Chairperson(s): Aaron Barchowsky, University <strong>of</strong><br />
Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.<br />
Sponsor:<br />
Colgate-Palmolive Company<br />
The purpose <strong>of</strong> this lecture is to discuss the importance <strong>of</strong> animal research<br />
to biomedical sciences and toxicology and the ethical obligations <strong>of</strong><br />
the scientific community to follow the “3R’s” <strong>of</strong> animal testing (refine,<br />
reduce, replace) whenever it is feasible.<br />
Graduate students, undergraduates, postdoctoral scholars, and<br />
recipients <strong>of</strong> Colgate-Palmolive awards are among the guests at the<br />
In Vitro <strong>Toxicology</strong> Lecture and Luncheon. The goal <strong>of</strong> the In Vitro<br />
<strong>Toxicology</strong> Lecture series is to feature important research using<br />
in vitro and alternative techniques to study basic mechanisms and to<br />
illustrate how these test methods benefit animal welfare by refining and<br />
reducing animal use. Students and postdocs can reserve a ticket for the<br />
luncheon with a $10 deposit when they register for the SOT Annual<br />
Meeting. Lunch is served at the beginning <strong>of</strong> the event and service<br />
concludes before the talk/main program begins. Meal service may not be<br />
available to guests who arrive after 12:30 PM.<br />
The “Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century” vision promulgates an<br />
in vitro approach to safety assessment based heavily on knowing the<br />
pathways responding in a cell and then correctly relating that to an in<br />
vivo exposure and response to predict the likely health outcome. But we<br />
are now much like Galileo was with our Moon: seeing the goal is many,<br />
many times easier than actually getting there. However, given that animal<br />
models correctly predict only 40–70% <strong>of</strong> human responses, in vitro<br />
models won’t actually have to do that well to be better than the current in<br />
vivo models (i.e., the bar is low). Thus, for both animal-use issues and for<br />
correct-predictivity issues, an in vitro future is a worthy and achievable<br />
goal. Meanwhile, there is much trial and error (and error) (and error) to<br />
pursue.<br />
This talk will quickly reprise an in vitro testing vision, and then put it into<br />
an industry perspective. It will soon become clear that we’re a long way<br />
from where we want to be. After this stage-setting, the audience will be<br />
asked to discuss and then present their answer to a set <strong>of</strong> related questions.<br />
<br />
Monday Afternoon, March 7<br />
12:00 NOON to 1:00 PM<br />
Room 103<br />
(See page 84 for more information)<br />
Special Interest Group Presidents and Officers Meeting<br />
If you will be a President or a Vice President <strong>of</strong> a Special Interest Group<br />
in 2011–2012, please make plans to attend the Special Interest Groups<br />
Presidents and Officers meeting. The agenda for the meeting will include<br />
an overview <strong>of</strong> the SOT Strategic Plan, SOT Headquarters administrative<br />
support information, ToXchange, a review <strong>of</strong> 2010–2011 activities and<br />
plans for the future.<br />
Abstract #<br />
Monday Afternoon, March 7<br />
12:00 NOON to 2:00 PM<br />
Embassy Suites, Capital Ballroom B<br />
Regional Chapter Meeting/Luncheon: Central States<br />
Monday Afternoon, March 7<br />
12:00 NOON to 1:00 PM<br />
Room 149<br />
Specialty Section Meeting/Luncheon: Toxicologic and<br />
Exploratory Pathology<br />
Monday Afternoon, March 7<br />
12:10 PM to 1:30 PM<br />
Room 144<br />
Roundtable Session: Reforming the Toxic Substances Control<br />
Act (TSCA): Challenges, Opportunities, and Timing<br />
Chairperson(s): Thomas Lewandowski, Gradient, Seattle, WA, and<br />
Stanley Barone, U.S. EPA, Washington, D.C.<br />
Sponsor:<br />
Regulatory and Safety Evaluation Specialty Section<br />
Endorsed by:<br />
Nanotoxicology Specialty Section<br />
Risk Assessment Specialty Section<br />
The Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) <strong>of</strong> 1976 significantly changed<br />
the regulatory landscape for chemicals in the United States. It gave the<br />
federal government greater powers to track the introduction <strong>of</strong> new chemicals<br />
into the consumer marketplace, provided the U.S. EPA with limited<br />
powers to require testing <strong>of</strong> new chemicals, and allowed for case-by-case<br />
restriction <strong>of</strong> chemicals shown to be particularly hazardous. Yet the basic<br />
provisions <strong>of</strong> TSCA are now 35 years old, and unlike most major environmental<br />
laws passed in the 1970s, the TSCA legal framework remains<br />
essentially unchanged. Achieving the goals <strong>of</strong> TSCA, namely to ensure that<br />
adequate data are available to allow assessment <strong>of</strong> the effect <strong>of</strong> chemical<br />
substances and mixtures on health and the environment has also proven<br />
difficult. The regulatory apparatus has been unable to cope with the large<br />
number <strong>of</strong> chemicals requiring evaluation, has focused on new rather than<br />
existing chemicals, has largely ignored the potential interaction <strong>of</strong> chemicals<br />
occurring in mixtures, and has generally failed to keep up with advances<br />
in technology. While once a model regulation for other nations, the TSCA<br />
framework has now been superseded by chemical safety regulations adopted<br />
by other jurisdictions (e.g., REACH). Given the dramatic changes in chemical<br />
technology, toxicology, and risk assessment that are expected to occur<br />
in the near future, reform <strong>of</strong> TSCA is seen as a high priority by many stakeholders.<br />
Issues that are likely to be addressed by reform <strong>of</strong> TSCA include<br />
the distinct toxicology and exposure scenarios posed by nanotechnology, the<br />
possibility <strong>of</strong> basing hazard identification for the large number <strong>of</strong> chemicals<br />
requiring assessment on mechanistic and in vitro data rather than standard<br />
animal tests, and consideration <strong>of</strong> special population groups (not only<br />
children but also those with genetic susceptibilities or chronic health conditions).<br />
Reform <strong>of</strong> TSCA has the potential to greatly affect the way chemical<br />
risks are assessed in the U.S. and may therefore have a significant impact on<br />
the daily lives <strong>of</strong> society members.<br />
#417 12:10 REFORMING THE TOXIC SUBSTANCES<br />
CONTROL ACT (TSCA): CHALLENGES,<br />
OPPORTUNITIES, AND TIMING. T.<br />
Lewandowski 1 and S. Barone 2 . 1 Gradient, Seattle, WA<br />
and 2 U.S. EPA, Washington, D.C.<br />
12:10 TSCA:TIME FOR A CHANGE. Thomas<br />
Lewandowski<br />
MONday<br />
Poster Sessions<br />
Regional Interest Session<br />
Roundtable Sessions<br />
Symposium Sessions<br />
Thematic Sessions<br />
Workshop Sessions<br />
151