Program - Society of Toxicology
Program - Society of Toxicology
Program - Society of Toxicology
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Society</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Toxicology</strong> 2011<br />
<strong>Program</strong> Description (Continued)<br />
Abstract #<br />
Tuesday Morning, March 8<br />
6:30 AM to 7:50 AM<br />
Room 144<br />
Tuesday Morning<br />
Roundtable Session: Current Uses and Understanding <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Tissue Cross Reactivity Assay<br />
Chairperson(s): Jeanine Bussiere, Amgen, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, and<br />
Michael Leach, Pfizer, Andover, MA.<br />
Sponsor:<br />
Biotechnology Specialty Section<br />
Endorsed by:<br />
Toxicologic and Exploratory Pathology Specialty Section<br />
Tissue cross-reactivity (TCR) studies are screening assays conducted<br />
with monoclonal antibodies and related antibody-like biopharmaceuticals<br />
primarily to identify <strong>of</strong>f-target binding, and secondarily to identify sites <strong>of</strong><br />
on-target binding that were not previously identified. As presently utilized<br />
by the biopharmaceutical industry and regulatory agencies, TCR studies<br />
usually involve the ex vivo immunohistochemical (IHC) staining <strong>of</strong> a<br />
panel <strong>of</strong> frozen tissues from humans and animals. However, other methods<br />
<strong>of</strong> conducting TCR studies are possible. While ex vivo TCR studies have<br />
become routine in the development <strong>of</strong> antibody therapeutics, their value<br />
for the purpose <strong>of</strong> making safety assessment decisions by both industry and<br />
regulatory agencies has been questioned as experience with the assay has<br />
increased. Recently, an industry white paper was published to review the<br />
use <strong>of</strong> tissue cross-reactivity studies in the development <strong>of</strong> antibody-based<br />
biopharmaceuticals: history, experience, methodology, and future directions.<br />
In addition, a multinational pharmaceutical and biotechnology company<br />
survey was conducted to gain a better understanding <strong>of</strong> the use and value <strong>of</strong><br />
the TCR assay in the development <strong>of</strong> biotherapeutic molecules. The information<br />
from this survey can be used to help understand the appropriate use<br />
and interpretation <strong>of</strong> this assay in a nonclinical drug development program.<br />
Our panel <strong>of</strong> experts will address the following issues <strong>of</strong> importance<br />
including how we got to where we are today; the technical aspects <strong>of</strong> the<br />
TCR assay and issues with interpretation; case studies and summary from<br />
white paper on use <strong>of</strong> TCR; industry survey results on use <strong>of</strong> the TCR assay;<br />
and, the new technologies for identifying <strong>of</strong>f-target binding <strong>of</strong> monoclonal<br />
antibodies.<br />
#881 6:30 CURRENT USES AND UNDERSTANDING<br />
OF THE TISSUE CROSS REACTIVITY<br />
ASSAY. J. L. Bussiere 1 , J. Cavagnaro 5 , E.<br />
Galbreath 3 , T. Machlachlan 6 , N. Dybdal 4 and M.<br />
Leach 2 . 1 <strong>Toxicology</strong>, Amgen, Inc., Thousand Oaks,<br />
CA, 2 Drug Safety Research and Development,<br />
Pfizer, Andover, MA, 3 <strong>Toxicology</strong>, Lilly Research<br />
Laboratories, Indianapolis, IN, 4 Safety Assessment,<br />
Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA,<br />
5<br />
AccessBio, Boyce, VA and 6 Pharmacology and<br />
<strong>Toxicology</strong>, Genzyme, Framingham, MA.<br />
6:30 TCR: HOW WE GOT TO WHERE WE ARE<br />
TODAY. Joy Cavagnaro<br />
6:45 TECHNICAL ASPECTS OF THE TCR ASSAY<br />
AND ISSUES WITH INTERPRETATION. <br />
Elizabeth Galbreath<br />
7:00 CASE STUDIES AND SUMMARY FROM<br />
THE WHITE PAPER ON USE OF TCR. Tim<br />
MacLachlan<br />
7:15 INDUSTRY SURVEY RESULTS ON USE OF<br />
THE TCR ASSAY. Jeanine L. Bussiere<br />
7:30 PANEL DISCUSSION/Q&A.<br />
Abstract #<br />
Tuesday Morning, March 8<br />
6:30 AM to 7:50 AM<br />
Room 143<br />
Emerging Global Public Health Issues<br />
Roundtable Session: Risk and Risk Management <strong>of</strong><br />
Potentially Toxic Compounds Formed by Cooking Food<br />
Chairperson(s): Steven Hermansky, ConAgra Foods, Inc., Omaha, NE,<br />
and Wu Li, Frito-Lay, Inc., Plano, TX.<br />
Sponsor:<br />
Food Safety Specialty Section<br />
Endorsed by:<br />
Regulatory and Safety Evaluation Specialty Section<br />
Risk Assessment Specialty Section<br />
The discovery <strong>of</strong> acrylamide in food in 2002 by Swedish researchers initiated<br />
an international effort to assess exposure and manage risk to the public.<br />
Millions <strong>of</strong> dollars and countless hours <strong>of</strong> resources have been dedicated to<br />
this effort around the world. The concept that cooking changes the chemistry<br />
<strong>of</strong> food is not new but the presence <strong>of</strong> acrylamide across a wide variety <strong>of</strong><br />
foods brought a new perspective to food safety for the international regulatory<br />
community. This issue continues to develop as different research groups<br />
focus on multiple heat-formed chemicals and various aspects <strong>of</strong> toxicology<br />
<strong>of</strong> these naturally occurring compounds. From the recent completion <strong>of</strong> the<br />
European Union HEATOX (Heat-Generated Food Toxicants: Identification,<br />
Characterization, and Risk Minimization) project to the development <strong>of</strong><br />
increasingly sensitive and refined analytical methods that are able to detect<br />
ever lower concentrations <strong>of</strong> compounds in foods, it is becoming increasingly<br />
clear that acrylamide only represents one compound <strong>of</strong> many. This<br />
revelation presents challenges to both the scientific and regulatory communities.<br />
Just as importantly, resources are more frequently stretched thin<br />
as scientific debates are played out in the mass media and the credibility<br />
<strong>of</strong> the scientific and regulatory process is challenged. We will discuss the<br />
challenges and opportunities presented by risk management <strong>of</strong> compounds<br />
formed in food during cooking.<br />
#882 6:30 RISK AND RISK MANAGEMENT OF<br />
POTENTIALLY TOXIC COMPOUNDS<br />
FORMED BY COOKING FOOD. S. J.<br />
Hermansky 1 , W. Li 8 , R. Lane 2 , N. Rachman 4 , S.<br />
Olin 5 , T. Troxell 3 , M. Bolger 6 and A. Tritscher 7 .<br />
1<br />
ConAgra Foods, Omaha, NE, 2 Pepsico, Valhalla,<br />
NY, 3 Exponent, Washington, D.C., 4 Grocery<br />
Manufacturer’s Association, Washington, D.C., 5 ILSI<br />
Research Foundation, Washington, D.C., 6 U.S. FDA<br />
Center for Food Safety and Nutrition, Washington,<br />
D.C., 7 World Health Organization, Geneva,<br />
Switzerland and 8 Frito Lay, Plano, TX.<br />
6:30 INTRODUCTORY REMARKS AND<br />
SUMMARY OF NEW DATA. Steven J.<br />
Hermansky<br />
6:35 THE POLITICS OF CHEMICAL FOOD<br />
SAFETY. Richard Lane<br />
6:47 THE NEW FOOD LANDSCAPE:<br />
BALANCING THE BENEFITS WITH THE<br />
CHEMICAL RISKS OF COOKING. Nancy J.<br />
Rachman<br />
6:59 EVALUATING THE TOXICOLOGY OF<br />
CHEMICALS IN FOOD: DO WE NEED A<br />
NEW PARADIGM? Steve S. Olin<br />
7:11 ESTABLISHING A FUTURE RISK<br />
MANAGEMENT VISION FOR COOKING<br />
TOXINS. Terry Troxell<br />
7:23 PANEL DISCUSSION. Mike Bolger and<br />
Angelika Tritscher<br />
Tuesday<br />
Poster Sessions<br />
Regional Interest Session<br />
Roundtable Sessions<br />
Symposium Sessions<br />
Thematic Sessions<br />
Workshop Sessions<br />
193