27.09.2014 Views

Program - Society of Toxicology

Program - Society of Toxicology

Program - Society of Toxicology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Society</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Toxicology</strong> 2011<br />

<strong>Program</strong> Description (Continued)<br />

Abstract #<br />

#1714 3:35 MACROPHAGE DIVERSITY PROMOTES<br />

TUMOR PROGRESSION AND METASTASIS. ​<br />

J. W. Pollard. Department <strong>of</strong> Developmental and<br />

Molecular Biology, Albert Einstein College <strong>of</strong><br />

Medicine Yeshiva University, New York. Sponsor: D.<br />

Laskin.<br />

4:05 PANEL DISCUSSION/Q&A.<br />

Tuesday Afternoon, March 8<br />

1:30 PM to 4:15 PM<br />

Room 147<br />

Integration <strong>of</strong> Toxicological and Epidemiological Evidence<br />

to Understand Human Risk<br />

Symposium Session: When Is Exposure Not Exposure?<br />

Defining the Dose-Response Region between “Effect” and<br />

“Adverse Effect” Implications for Human Health Risk<br />

Assessment<br />

Chairperson(s): Caroline English, NSF International, Ann Arbor, MI, and<br />

Edward Ohanian, U.S. EPA, Washington, D.C.<br />

Sponsor:<br />

Risk Assessment Specialty Section<br />

Endorsed by:<br />

Molecular Biology Specialty Section<br />

‘Omics technologies demonstrate global changes in gene regulation and<br />

expression following chemical exposure, causing toxicologists to revisit the<br />

question, what is an adverse effect and what isn’t. Dose-dependent transitions<br />

in genomic and related responses reflect the levels <strong>of</strong> exposure that<br />

cause detectable perturbations to the biological system under study. We<br />

will focus on two transitions, having both dose and temporal dimensions,<br />

which are advanced as being pivotal to understanding mode <strong>of</strong> action and<br />

prediction <strong>of</strong> toxicity. The first transition is from no-detectable-effect on the<br />

biological system relative to unexposed controls, to the first-perceptibleeffect<br />

at the global genome level; observed as up- and down-regulation<br />

<strong>of</strong> genes that regulate adaptive responses. The second transition is from<br />

the adaptive response region to the first adverse response or critical effect<br />

region <strong>of</strong> the dose-response relationship. We will explore if and how ‘omic<br />

phenomena elicited by chemical exposures translate into useful information<br />

for risk assessors. Consideration <strong>of</strong> the adaptive capacity <strong>of</strong> the biological<br />

system and severity <strong>of</strong> the effect might further inform our definition <strong>of</strong><br />

the term adverse and inform the magnitude <strong>of</strong> traditional uncertainty<br />

factors used. Understanding dose-dependent transitions combined with<br />

dosimetry models that characterize the exposure-tissue concentration relationship<br />

might permit risk assessors to define exposures delimited by safe<br />

and adverse boundaries. We will conclude by describing emerging advances<br />

in high-throughput quantitative ‘omic technologies, and findings from<br />

studies with endogenous and exogenous compounds and nanoparticulates, to<br />

address how we move from the vast array <strong>of</strong> ‘omic data generated to practical<br />

risk assessment applications.<br />

#1715 1:30 WHEN IS EXPOSURE NOT EXPOSURE?<br />

DEFINING THE DOSE-RESPONSE REGION<br />

BETWEEN “EFFECT” AND “ADVERSE<br />

EFFECT” IMPLICATIONS FOR HUMAN<br />

HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT. ​C. English. NSF<br />

International, Ann Arbor, MI.<br />

1:30 INTRODUCTION. ​Caroline English<br />

#1716 1:39 USE OF THE HIERARCHICAL OXIDATIVE<br />

STRESS PARADIGM FOR HAZARD AND<br />

RISK ASSESSMENT IN RESPONSE TO<br />

AMBIENT ULTRAFINE AND ENGINEERED<br />

NANOPARTICLE TOXICITY. ​A. E. Nel.<br />

Medicine, University <strong>of</strong> California Los Angeles, Los<br />

Angeles, CA. Sponsor: A. Nel.<br />

Abstract #<br />

#1717 2:05 HUMAN EXPOSURE CONTEXT FOR<br />

NANOPARTICLE TOXICITY ASSESSMENT<br />

BY BIOLOGICAL PATHWAY BASED DOSE-<br />

RESPONSE MODELING. ​J. G. Teeguarden 1 ,<br />

M. N. Costa 2 , K. M. Waters 2 and J. E. McDermott 2 .<br />

1<br />

Biological Monitoring and Modeling, Pacific<br />

Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA and<br />

2<br />

Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Pacific<br />

Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA.<br />

#1718 2:31 TIME-DEPENDENT CHANGES IN THE<br />

TRANSCRIPTOME: AN APPROACH FOR<br />

IDENTIFYING TRANSCRIPTIONAL<br />

PROFILES ASSOCIATED WITH THE ONSET<br />

OF CHRONIC PHENOTYPIC CHANGES. ​<br />

D. C. Wolf. NHEERL/ORD, U. S. EPA, Research<br />

Triangle Park, NC.<br />

#1719 2:57 FORMALDEHYDE: DOSE-DEPENDENT<br />

TRANSITIONS FOR AN ENDOGENOUS<br />

COMPOUND WITH HIGH DOSE<br />

CARCINOGENICITY. ​M. E. Andersen.<br />

Computational Biology, The Hamner Institutes for<br />

Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC.<br />

#1720 3:23 ENVIRONMENTAL EPIGENOMICS AND<br />

RISK ASSESSMENT: WHAT CONSTITUTES<br />

AN ADVERSE EFFECT AND ISSUES OF<br />

NONLINEARITY. ​D. C. Dolinoy. Environmental<br />

Health Sciences, University <strong>of</strong> Michigan, Ann Arbor,<br />

MI.<br />

#1721 3:49 INTERPRETING DOSE-RESPONSE<br />

INFORMATION ON INTERMEDIATE<br />

STAGES OF CAUSAL CASCADES IN<br />

TOXICITY MODE OF ACTION. ​L. R.<br />

Rhomberg. Gradient, Cambridge, MA.<br />

Tuesday Afternoon, March 8<br />

1:30 PM to 4:15 PM<br />

Room 150<br />

Workshop Session: Nonclinical to Clinical Abuse Liability<br />

Assessment <strong>of</strong> Drugs: Current Practices, Challenges, and<br />

Impact <strong>of</strong> Recent Regulatory Guidance<br />

Chairperson(s): Brian Gemzik, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, and<br />

Carrie Markgraf, Merck, Lafayette, NJ.<br />

Sponsor:<br />

Regulatory and Safety Evaluation Specialty Section<br />

Endorsed by:<br />

Drug Discovery <strong>Toxicology</strong> Specialty Section<br />

Neurotoxicology Specialty Section<br />

An increased level <strong>of</strong> attention has been focused on the assessment <strong>of</strong> abuse<br />

liability for drugs that affect the central nervous system as a consequence<br />

<strong>of</strong> recent regulatory guidances from the EMEA, ICH, as part <strong>of</strong> M3(R2),<br />

and U.S. FDA (draft). It is therefore critical to understand the current<br />

issues facing the pharmaceutical research and regulatory communities in<br />

the evaluation <strong>of</strong> new drug candidates for abuse and dependence potential.<br />

Nonclinical and clinical evaluations each contribute to the assessment <strong>of</strong><br />

a drug for class scheduling, and to the information in the product label.<br />

Animal models for the study <strong>of</strong> drugs with pharmacologic mechanisms<br />

known to be associated with abuse are well characterized, and clinical trial<br />

protocols enrolling experienced users <strong>of</strong> abused drugs have been widely<br />

utilized in risk assessment. However, unique challenges are encountered<br />

in both nonclinical and clinical discovery and development settings when<br />

evaluating drugs with novel mechanisms <strong>of</strong> action. In recognition <strong>of</strong> the<br />

need for a broad and integrated understanding in the toxicology community,<br />

this symposium will blend current topics in this field <strong>of</strong> growing interest,<br />

Tuesday<br />

Poster Sessions<br />

Regional Interest Session<br />

Roundtable Sessions<br />

Symposium Sessions<br />

Thematic Sessions<br />

Workshop Sessions<br />

265

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!