Program - Society of Toxicology
Program - Society of Toxicology
Program - Society of Toxicology
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Society</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Toxicology</strong> 2011<br />
<strong>Program</strong> Description (Continued)<br />
Abstract #<br />
#1714 3:35 MACROPHAGE DIVERSITY PROMOTES<br />
TUMOR PROGRESSION AND METASTASIS. <br />
J. W. Pollard. Department <strong>of</strong> Developmental and<br />
Molecular Biology, Albert Einstein College <strong>of</strong><br />
Medicine Yeshiva University, New York. Sponsor: D.<br />
Laskin.<br />
4:05 PANEL DISCUSSION/Q&A.<br />
Tuesday Afternoon, March 8<br />
1:30 PM to 4:15 PM<br />
Room 147<br />
Integration <strong>of</strong> Toxicological and Epidemiological Evidence<br />
to Understand Human Risk<br />
Symposium Session: When Is Exposure Not Exposure?<br />
Defining the Dose-Response Region between “Effect” and<br />
“Adverse Effect” Implications for Human Health Risk<br />
Assessment<br />
Chairperson(s): Caroline English, NSF International, Ann Arbor, MI, and<br />
Edward Ohanian, U.S. EPA, Washington, D.C.<br />
Sponsor:<br />
Risk Assessment Specialty Section<br />
Endorsed by:<br />
Molecular Biology Specialty Section<br />
‘Omics technologies demonstrate global changes in gene regulation and<br />
expression following chemical exposure, causing toxicologists to revisit the<br />
question, what is an adverse effect and what isn’t. Dose-dependent transitions<br />
in genomic and related responses reflect the levels <strong>of</strong> exposure that<br />
cause detectable perturbations to the biological system under study. We<br />
will focus on two transitions, having both dose and temporal dimensions,<br />
which are advanced as being pivotal to understanding mode <strong>of</strong> action and<br />
prediction <strong>of</strong> toxicity. The first transition is from no-detectable-effect on the<br />
biological system relative to unexposed controls, to the first-perceptibleeffect<br />
at the global genome level; observed as up- and down-regulation<br />
<strong>of</strong> genes that regulate adaptive responses. The second transition is from<br />
the adaptive response region to the first adverse response or critical effect<br />
region <strong>of</strong> the dose-response relationship. We will explore if and how ‘omic<br />
phenomena elicited by chemical exposures translate into useful information<br />
for risk assessors. Consideration <strong>of</strong> the adaptive capacity <strong>of</strong> the biological<br />
system and severity <strong>of</strong> the effect might further inform our definition <strong>of</strong><br />
the term adverse and inform the magnitude <strong>of</strong> traditional uncertainty<br />
factors used. Understanding dose-dependent transitions combined with<br />
dosimetry models that characterize the exposure-tissue concentration relationship<br />
might permit risk assessors to define exposures delimited by safe<br />
and adverse boundaries. We will conclude by describing emerging advances<br />
in high-throughput quantitative ‘omic technologies, and findings from<br />
studies with endogenous and exogenous compounds and nanoparticulates, to<br />
address how we move from the vast array <strong>of</strong> ‘omic data generated to practical<br />
risk assessment applications.<br />
#1715 1:30 WHEN IS EXPOSURE NOT EXPOSURE?<br />
DEFINING THE DOSE-RESPONSE REGION<br />
BETWEEN “EFFECT” AND “ADVERSE<br />
EFFECT” IMPLICATIONS FOR HUMAN<br />
HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT. C. English. NSF<br />
International, Ann Arbor, MI.<br />
1:30 INTRODUCTION. Caroline English<br />
#1716 1:39 USE OF THE HIERARCHICAL OXIDATIVE<br />
STRESS PARADIGM FOR HAZARD AND<br />
RISK ASSESSMENT IN RESPONSE TO<br />
AMBIENT ULTRAFINE AND ENGINEERED<br />
NANOPARTICLE TOXICITY. A. E. Nel.<br />
Medicine, University <strong>of</strong> California Los Angeles, Los<br />
Angeles, CA. Sponsor: A. Nel.<br />
Abstract #<br />
#1717 2:05 HUMAN EXPOSURE CONTEXT FOR<br />
NANOPARTICLE TOXICITY ASSESSMENT<br />
BY BIOLOGICAL PATHWAY BASED DOSE-<br />
RESPONSE MODELING. J. G. Teeguarden 1 ,<br />
M. N. Costa 2 , K. M. Waters 2 and J. E. McDermott 2 .<br />
1<br />
Biological Monitoring and Modeling, Pacific<br />
Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA and<br />
2<br />
Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Pacific<br />
Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA.<br />
#1718 2:31 TIME-DEPENDENT CHANGES IN THE<br />
TRANSCRIPTOME: AN APPROACH FOR<br />
IDENTIFYING TRANSCRIPTIONAL<br />
PROFILES ASSOCIATED WITH THE ONSET<br />
OF CHRONIC PHENOTYPIC CHANGES. <br />
D. C. Wolf. NHEERL/ORD, U. S. EPA, Research<br />
Triangle Park, NC.<br />
#1719 2:57 FORMALDEHYDE: DOSE-DEPENDENT<br />
TRANSITIONS FOR AN ENDOGENOUS<br />
COMPOUND WITH HIGH DOSE<br />
CARCINOGENICITY. M. E. Andersen.<br />
Computational Biology, The Hamner Institutes for<br />
Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC.<br />
#1720 3:23 ENVIRONMENTAL EPIGENOMICS AND<br />
RISK ASSESSMENT: WHAT CONSTITUTES<br />
AN ADVERSE EFFECT AND ISSUES OF<br />
NONLINEARITY. D. C. Dolinoy. Environmental<br />
Health Sciences, University <strong>of</strong> Michigan, Ann Arbor,<br />
MI.<br />
#1721 3:49 INTERPRETING DOSE-RESPONSE<br />
INFORMATION ON INTERMEDIATE<br />
STAGES OF CAUSAL CASCADES IN<br />
TOXICITY MODE OF ACTION. L. R.<br />
Rhomberg. Gradient, Cambridge, MA.<br />
Tuesday Afternoon, March 8<br />
1:30 PM to 4:15 PM<br />
Room 150<br />
Workshop Session: Nonclinical to Clinical Abuse Liability<br />
Assessment <strong>of</strong> Drugs: Current Practices, Challenges, and<br />
Impact <strong>of</strong> Recent Regulatory Guidance<br />
Chairperson(s): Brian Gemzik, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, and<br />
Carrie Markgraf, Merck, Lafayette, NJ.<br />
Sponsor:<br />
Regulatory and Safety Evaluation Specialty Section<br />
Endorsed by:<br />
Drug Discovery <strong>Toxicology</strong> Specialty Section<br />
Neurotoxicology Specialty Section<br />
An increased level <strong>of</strong> attention has been focused on the assessment <strong>of</strong> abuse<br />
liability for drugs that affect the central nervous system as a consequence<br />
<strong>of</strong> recent regulatory guidances from the EMEA, ICH, as part <strong>of</strong> M3(R2),<br />
and U.S. FDA (draft). It is therefore critical to understand the current<br />
issues facing the pharmaceutical research and regulatory communities in<br />
the evaluation <strong>of</strong> new drug candidates for abuse and dependence potential.<br />
Nonclinical and clinical evaluations each contribute to the assessment <strong>of</strong><br />
a drug for class scheduling, and to the information in the product label.<br />
Animal models for the study <strong>of</strong> drugs with pharmacologic mechanisms<br />
known to be associated with abuse are well characterized, and clinical trial<br />
protocols enrolling experienced users <strong>of</strong> abused drugs have been widely<br />
utilized in risk assessment. However, unique challenges are encountered<br />
in both nonclinical and clinical discovery and development settings when<br />
evaluating drugs with novel mechanisms <strong>of</strong> action. In recognition <strong>of</strong> the<br />
need for a broad and integrated understanding in the toxicology community,<br />
this symposium will blend current topics in this field <strong>of</strong> growing interest,<br />
Tuesday<br />
Poster Sessions<br />
Regional Interest Session<br />
Roundtable Sessions<br />
Symposium Sessions<br />
Thematic Sessions<br />
Workshop Sessions<br />
265