08.01.2015 Views

Employmentweb_low

Employmentweb_low

Employmentweb_low

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

employment relations and health inequalities: a conceptual and empirical overvieW<br />

Occupational injuries<br />

Occupational injuries are among the most visible negative effects of poor<br />

employment and working conditions. according to the best available<br />

worldwide estimates, the number of non-fatal occupational injuries that<br />

cause at least three days' absence from work is 264 million per year,<br />

more than 700,000 injured workers per day (Hämäläinen, Takala, &<br />

leena, 2006). It has been calculated that annually, the global number<br />

of fatal injuries is approximately 350,000, meaning that every day, 970<br />

workers die due to their working conditions. Currently, fatal and nonfatal<br />

occupational injuries produce about 10.5 million disabilityadjusted<br />

life years (Dalys): about 3.5 years of healthy life lost per<br />

1,000 workers every year globally. This is responsible for 8.8 per cent<br />

of the global burden of mortality (Concha-Barrientos, nelson,<br />

Fingerhut, Driscoll, & leigh, 2005). This enormous burden of disease<br />

is unequally distributed by social class, gender, ethnicity, age, and<br />

migrant status (see Case studies 34 and 35).<br />

Child operating sugar cane press (india).<br />

Structural changes from agricultural and industrial to service<br />

source: marc schenker (2000)<br />

economies, with outsourcing of dangerous industries to poor<br />

countries, together with stricter regulation of preventive measures in<br />

companies, result in a decrease in occupational injuries in rich regions.<br />

nevertheless, in the EU-15 it has been estimated that over 121,000 people die<br />

each year due to an occupational injury or by a disease caused by working<br />

conditions (IlO, 2005). Conversely, while they are decreasing in wealthy<br />

countries, work-related injuries are growing in middle- and <strong>low</strong>-income<br />

countries. This picture is particularly worrisome (see Case study 36). Based<br />

on occupational injury rates estimated by the World Bank region (Figure 12),<br />

the risk of fatal and non-fatal occupational injury in China and India is about<br />

two and a half times higher than in the Established Market Economies' region<br />

(basically Europe and north america). This difference is five times higher in<br />

the case of africa south of the Sahara economic region. rich countries have<br />

the <strong>low</strong>est rates. Fatal rates in Sweden and the United Kingdom are 1.9 and<br />

0.8 per 100,000 workers, respectively, while in Mozambique or Kenya the<br />

fatality rates are 21.6 per 100.000 workers, similar to that in Bolivia, where the<br />

fatality rate is 21.9. These inequalities in occupational health are even more<br />

evident when we compare occupational injuries between two pairs of<br />

neighbouring countries located in sensitive areas, where economic and social<br />

differences are huge, Mexico and the USa, and Spain and Morocco.<br />

Occupational injury rates in Mexico (fatal 15.9 and non-fatal 121.3) are roughly<br />

three times higher than in the USa (fatal 5.2 and non-fatal 39.6). Even more<br />

dramatic differences can be seen between Spain (8.9 and 68.03) and Morocco<br />

(47.8 and 364.9), where they are approximately five times higher. These<br />

differences may in fact be higher, because underestimation bias is probably<br />

more significant in poor countries.<br />

187

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!