08.01.2015 Views

Employmentweb_low

Employmentweb_low

Employmentweb_low

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

EmploymEnT, woRk, and hEalTh inEqualiTiEs - a global perspective<br />

over-representation of racialised groups in precarious occupations;<br />

that is, contract, temporary, part-time and shift work with little or no<br />

job security, poor and frequently unsafe working conditions,<br />

intensive labour, long work hours, <strong>low</strong> wages, and no benefits. many<br />

racialised groups work in textile and garment-making industries,<br />

light manufacturing industries and in the service sector.<br />

In 2003, 32.4% of all Canadian workers were covered by a<br />

collective agreement. according to the oECD, union density in<br />

Canada is 28.1%, one of the <strong>low</strong>est among the 16 oECD countries<br />

(oECD, 2006). unionisation has helped reduce the wage gap<br />

between men and women (Jackson, 2005). The union advantage is<br />

greater for women than for men. The pay gap between union men<br />

and union women is a little over $2 per hour, compared to more than<br />

$4 for non-union men and non-union women. racialised workers<br />

who were covered by a collective agreement earned an average<br />

annual income of $33,525 in 1999, compared to $7,724 for racialised<br />

workers who were not covered by collective agreements.<br />

In recent years, Canadian governments have opted for<br />

deregulating many aspects of work. Canadian governments object<br />

to labour market regulation to protect workers in precarious<br />

employment on the grounds that such policies will harm those they<br />

are intended to help. Jackson attributes this belief to an orthodoxy<br />

that has emerged to defend neo-liberal policies that are believed to<br />

perpetuate precarious and insecure employment (Jackson, 2005).<br />

an additional made-in-Canada pressure is a commitment among<br />

Canadian provincial and federal governments to reduce public deficits.<br />

Canadian governments have begun to dismantle welfare state programs<br />

in order to achieve this financial objective. for example, unemployment<br />

Insurance (uI), a feature of the Canadian welfare state, was replaced by<br />

Employment Insurance (EI) in 1992. a worker paid into uI benefits, and<br />

was entitled to these benefits upon losing a job until their reentry into the<br />

labour force. under EI, unemployed workers are entitled to receive only<br />

52 weeks of benefits. upon termination of EI benefits, if a worker has<br />

been unable to secure employment within the benefit period, they must<br />

apply for social assistance. social assistance is a provincially<br />

administered program. restricting eligibility for EI benefits has caused<br />

social assistance rolls to swell.<br />

In 1996, the liberal federal government tightened eligibility<br />

requirements, which makes it more difficult for part-time workers -<br />

many of whom are women - to collect their EI contributions (Black<br />

& shillington, 2005).<br />

a recent study by the Work network of the Canadian policy<br />

research networks found that education and training opportunities<br />

70

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!