08.01.2015 Views

Employmentweb_low

Employmentweb_low

Employmentweb_low

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

AppeNdIx<br />

Country clusters<br />

table A5 shows the regional distribution of clusters. core countries are<br />

western and southern european countries; semi-peripheral countries are<br />

mostly east Asian and east european countries, as well as latin America,<br />

with a couple of African countries; peripheral countries are predominantly<br />

African and south east Asian countries, with some caribbean countries.<br />

core countries<br />

the cluster analysis of epl indices for regular workers and temporary<br />

workers and the union density in core countries resulted in 4 different types<br />

of labour markets. we present these findings in Figure A5 with the x-axis<br />

representing union density and the y-axis representing the epl indices. of<br />

the two epl indices, the smaller is that of temporary workers. nordic<br />

countries (sweden, Finland, denmark, norway), Belgium, and italy<br />

constitute a cluster where both epl scores are in the medium range and<br />

relatively similar to each other, but with significantly higher union density<br />

compared to the rest of the countries analyzed. France, spain, portugal, and<br />

Greece have the most protection for regular workers and comparatively <strong>low</strong><br />

protection for temporary workers, with the difference being relatively large.<br />

these are countries with <strong>low</strong> to medium union density, but with high<br />

collective bargaining coverage (not shown in this graph). there is another<br />

layer of countries beneath these, with medium protection for both full time<br />

and temporary workers but with a large difference between these two<br />

classes of workers. this group includes south korea, poland, Hungary,<br />

Japan, netherlands, czech rep., slovak rep., and Austria. the last group is<br />

comprised of liberal countries (the Us, new Zealand, Australia, canada, Uk,<br />

ireland) and switzerland, with <strong>low</strong> protection for both regular and<br />

temporary workers and with small differences between the two.<br />

we merged the second and the third groups together and created three<br />

clusters of labour markets (table A5), which approximate the three worlds<br />

of welfare capitalism (esping-Andersen, 1990). Among countries usually<br />

categorised as corporatist conservative, Belgium fell into the social<br />

democratic labour institution cluster and switzerland into the liberal<br />

labour institution cluster in this analysis. Japan and southern european<br />

countries (portugal and spain) were categorized into corporatist<br />

conservative labour institutions, whereas italy was grouped with nordic<br />

countries. Based on the widely-accepted typology, we named them social<br />

democratic labour institutions, corporatist conservative labor institutions,<br />

and liberal labour institutions, respectively. As observed from Figure A5, the<br />

social democratic labour institution cluster presents high average union<br />

density (62.28%) combined with medium epl for both regular (2.05) and<br />

temporary (2.17) workers. corporatist conservative labour institution<br />

countries show <strong>low</strong> union density (22.01%) with high epl for both regular<br />

(2.83) and temporary (2.55) workers. liberal labour institution countries on<br />

average show <strong>low</strong> union density (24.78%) with very <strong>low</strong> epl for both regular<br />

(1.22) and temporary (0.63) workers.<br />

421

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!