08.01.2015 Views

Employmentweb_low

Employmentweb_low

Employmentweb_low

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

theoretical Model<br />

effects of the distribution of political power (called "power<br />

relations") on health inequalities through intermediary forces.<br />

The model begins with the interaction between political power<br />

relations and policy-making. The idea is that a redistribution of<br />

political power relations creates new policies concerning the labour<br />

market and the welfare state. These new policies are a form of<br />

economic redistribution, since they change the way the labour<br />

market functions, which in turn affects employment conditions. For<br />

example, when a new political party gains power, its members may<br />

implement different public policies that have different public health<br />

outcomes (Navarro & Shi, 2001; Navarro et al., 2006). Political power<br />

relations, therefore, are critical to the redistribution of economic<br />

resources and thus to the level of equality present in society.<br />

The main actors in the realm of political power relations, however,<br />

do not only redistribute resources and change policy, thus affecting<br />

social stratification; they also have an impact on the life experiences<br />

of different social groups through their influence over access to<br />

healthcare, social services, and working conditions including<br />

exposure to hazards. Social inequalities in health are therefore<br />

fundamentally the result of what might be called a "political economy<br />

of health" (Navarro & Muntaner, 2004; Navarro, 2002).<br />

The key causal force here is the power that government and civil<br />

society have over the labour market and welfare state policies. Their<br />

influence over the labour market is broad-ranging, with jurisdiction<br />

extending across labour regulations, collective bargaining and the<br />

power of trade unions. With respect to the welfare state, political<br />

power-holders determine the level of distribution to be achieved by<br />

social policy. Control over both institutions is fundamental to<br />

understanding employment relations, given that workers' welfare<br />

depends on both the functioning of the labour market and the social<br />

protection policies implemented by the state. Both serve to modify<br />

social stratification and therefore social inequalities.<br />

In our framework, labour regulation refers both to the specific<br />

regulation of the labour market (employment protection legislation)<br />

and to welfare state benefits related to a salaried relationship, such<br />

as health care benefits for those involuntarily leaving the labour<br />

market, or income security measures for the unemployed. Collective<br />

bargaining refers to one of the ways in which labour/capital relations<br />

can be conducted (see Section 6.1). Several studies have found that<br />

the most important factor in explaining pay dispersion is the level of<br />

wage-setting, i.e., whether wages are set at the level of the<br />

individual, the plant, the industry, or the entire private sector. The<br />

concentration of unions and the share of the labour force covered by<br />

“no workers without rights”. union rally in<br />

Barcelona (spain).<br />

source: antonio rosa (2005)<br />

31

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!