08.01.2015 Views

Employmentweb_low

Employmentweb_low

Employmentweb_low

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

employment relations and health inequalities: a conceptual and empirical overvieW<br />

of studies of psychosocial work stressors and mental health found<br />

consistent evidence that <strong>low</strong> decision latitude, high job demands, <strong>low</strong><br />

social supports at work, job strain and effort-reward imbalance were<br />

risk factors for subsequent mental health problems (Stansfeld &<br />

Candy, 2006). Finally, evidence suggests that job stressors such as<br />

high job demands, <strong>low</strong> job control, <strong>low</strong> social support, few rest break<br />

opportunities (Bongers, Kremer, & Ter laak, 2002), and job strain<br />

(rugulies & Krause, 2005) contribute to the development of<br />

musculoskeletal disorders of the upper extremity (such as carpal<br />

tunnel syndrome and tendonitis) and of the <strong>low</strong>er back, after taking<br />

into account physical job demands. acute injuries have also been<br />

associated with psychosocial stressors (Hanecke, Tiedemann,<br />

nachreiner, & Grzech-Sukalo, 1998; Clarke, Sloane, & aiken, 2002).<br />

another psychosocial characteristic of work linked to ill-health is<br />

threat-avoidant vigilant work, which involves continuously<br />

maintaining a high level of vigilance in order to avoid disaster, such<br />

as death. This is a feature of a number of occupations at high risk for<br />

CVD, e.g., truck drivers, air traffic controllers, and sea pilots (Belkic<br />

et al., 2000). The strongest evidence for threat-avoidant vigilance<br />

comes from studies of single occupations, where professional<br />

drivers, particularly urban transport operators, emerge as the<br />

occupation with the most consistent evidence of elevated risk of CVD<br />

(Belkic, Emdad, & Theorell, 1998; Tuchsen, 2000).<br />

although there appears to be some conceptual overlap between the<br />

three work stress models, empirical evidence suggests that they each<br />

independently influence health. From this perspective, an important<br />

scientific question has been posed. are these observed associations<br />

causal or are they a product of methodological problems associated<br />

with epidemiological studies of psychosocial factors and health such as<br />

reverse causality, reporting bias and residual confounding<br />

In spite of these concerns, there are plausible biological pathways<br />

which may mediate the association between work stress and health. In<br />

the Whitehall II study, there was a dose-response association between<br />

iso-strain (a combination of high demands, <strong>low</strong> control and <strong>low</strong><br />

support) and the metabolic syndrome, a cluster of physiological risk<br />

factors which increase the risk of heart disease and diabetes<br />

(Chandola, Brunner, & Marmot, 2006). Body mass index is another<br />

potential intermediate factor that has been associated with job strain.<br />

next, opportunistic studies of the effects of change in working<br />

conditions can provide stronger evidence for a causal link. For<br />

example, studies that have taken place in the context of downsizing<br />

have shown an association between change in working conditions and<br />

subsequent health. In the Whitehall II study, adverse changes in<br />

Ethiopian Airlines' technicians at work.<br />

Ethiopian Airlines (Ethiopia).<br />

source: © ilo/m. crozet (2003)<br />

199

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!