08.01.2015 Views

Employmentweb_low

Employmentweb_low

Employmentweb_low

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

eMployMent relations and health inequalities: pathways and MechanisMs<br />

selected case studies<br />

Case study 57. Human trafficking and involuntary servitude under the U.S.-Jordan free trade agreement. - charles<br />

Kernaghan and barbara briggs<br />

the u.s.-Jordan Free trade agreement went into effect in december 2001. over the next five years, apparel exports from<br />

Jordan to the united states soared by 2,300 per cent, growing from $521.1 million in 2000 to $1.2 billion in 2006. this was touted<br />

as a model agreement since, for the first time, workers’ rights standards and environmental protections were included in the<br />

core of the agreement. yet something went deeply wrong, and this agreement quickly descended into human trafficking and<br />

involuntary servitude. as of 2007, at least 36,149 guest workers are employed in Jordan’s 114 garment factories, at least 90 per<br />

cent of which are foreign-owned, mostly by asian investors. the guest workers come from bangladesh, china, sri lanka and<br />

india. bangladeshi guest workers had to pay $1,000 to $3,000 each to unscrupulous manpower agencies in bangladesh to<br />

purchase two- to three-year contracts to work in Jordan. this is an enormous amount of money in bangladesh, and as poor<br />

workers, they had to borrow the money on the informal market at exorbitant interest rates of 5 to 10 per cent per month. From<br />

the minute they took the loans, these workers were in a trap, a race against time to pay off their growing debts. the workers<br />

were promised that they would be able to earn $134.28 a month for regular hours and up to $250 a month with overtime. they<br />

were also promised that all housing, food and medical care would be free and that they would live well, “like they do in the west”.<br />

they would get at least one day off a week, sick days, vacation time and national holidays. but there was a catch: the contract<br />

tied the guest workers to just one factory, prohibiting them from working elsewhere.<br />

one hundred fifteen workers from bangladesh purchased contracts to work at the al shahaed garment factory in irbid,<br />

Jordan. upon their arrival at the airport, management immediately confiscated their passports. the workers were not provided<br />

with residency permits, thus they could not go out on the street without fear of being detained by the police for lack of the proper<br />

papers. once in the al shahaed factory, the workers found themselves forced to work shifts of 15, 38, 48 and even 72 hours<br />

straight, often going two or three days without sleep. they worked 7 days a week. workers who fell asleep at their sewing<br />

machines would be slapped and punched. instead of being paid the $250 a month that the ad promised, the workers earned 2<br />

cents an hour, or $2.31 for a 98-hour workweek. workers who asked for their legal wages could be imprisoned up to three days<br />

without food. workers who criticised the food the company provided were beaten with sticks and belts. twenty-eight workers<br />

had to share one small 3.65-by-3.65-metre dorm room, which had access to running water only every third day. these workers<br />

sewed clothing for wal-Mart. when, in desperation, the workers demanded their legal wages, they were forcibly deported and<br />

returned to bangladesh without their back wages. Many of these workers are now hiding in dhaka city and peddling bicycle<br />

rickshaws to survive. they cannot return to their home villages because they have no possible way to pay off the mounting debt<br />

they incurred to go to Jordan in the first place. these and many other cases were denounced in the report the national labour<br />

committee released in May 2006. by July 2006, shariff al Zuibi, Jordan’s trade Minister, declared, “our inspection regime may<br />

have failed us and may have failed us miserably.” Jordan’s labour department had just 88 labour inspectors to oversee 98,000<br />

business operations, and the primary role of the labour department inspectors was to issue work permits to foreign guest<br />

workers. by law, Jordan’s unions were not permitted to organise foreign workers. today (2007), the Jordanian government has<br />

closed at least ten of the worst garment factories, over 1,000 workers have been relocated to better factories, and conditions and<br />

treatment have improved in many factories across Jordan. although the government has seriously responded to reports of<br />

continued violations, much remains to be done. the guest workers are still denied the freedom of association and the right to<br />

organise. Moreover, we do not know of any case where the foreign guest workers were paid the outstanding back wages legally<br />

due to them. nor do we know of a single prosecution of factory owners for human trafficking and holding tens of thousands of<br />

workers under conditions of involuntary servitude.<br />

Sources<br />

the national labour committee. (2006, september 27). the state of Jordan’s garment factories.<br />

the national labour committee. (2007, February 14). statement of charles Kernagahan. directore of the national labour<br />

committee before the subcommittee on interstate commerce, trade and tourism committee on commerce, science<br />

and transportation.<br />

Case study 58. Economic structures enabling slavery in the United States. - the national economic and social rights initiative<br />

the increasing concentration of wealth in the united states continues to have deleterious effects on human wellbeing.<br />

in the agricultural sector this translates into increased purchasing power in the hands of fewer and larger food<br />

purchasers. currently, the agricultural industry is firmly in the control of large, consolidated buyers and retailers. buyers<br />

use their vast market power to obtain volume discounts, exerting a strong downward pressure on their suppliers’ prices.<br />

this market power has vastly increased in recent years. in a March 2004 report on the conditions of migrant farmworkers<br />

in the united states, oxfam america identified a significant shift in an important economic indicator known as the<br />

255

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!