08.01.2015 Views

Employmentweb_low

Employmentweb_low

Employmentweb_low

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

policies and interventions<br />

could establish the conditions, including oHs, under which work is performed. For example, in australia, laws integrating labour (pay, hours)<br />

and oHs standards and workers’ compensation entitlements and entailing mechanisms for transmitting legal responsibilities to the head<br />

of the supply chain (including mandatory codes) have been introduced in order to protect (mainly immigrant) home-based clothing workers,<br />

as well as truck drivers. also, a statutory licensing system covering labour supply agencies (gang masters) in agriculture, horticulture, and<br />

food processing has been introduced in the United Kingdom (James, Johnstone, Quinlan, & Walters, 2007). Finally, there are also proposals<br />

to extend regulatory intervention in contractual mechanisms in the international sphere, including poor countries (Macklem, 2002).<br />

references<br />

James, p., Johnstone, r., Quinlan, M., & Walters, d. (2007). regulating supply chains for safety and health. Industrial Law<br />

Journal, 36(2), 163-187.<br />

Johnstone, r., Quinlan, M., & Mayhew, c. (2001). outsourcing risk the regulation of oHs where contractors are employed.<br />

Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal, 22(2-3), 351-393.<br />

loos, F., & le deaut, J. (2002). Rapport fait au nom de la commission d’enquete sur la surete des installations industrielles et des centres de<br />

recherche et sur la proection de personnes et de l’environnment en cas d’accident industriel majeur. paris: assemblee nationale.<br />

Macklem, p. (2002). labour law beyond borders. Journal of International Economic Law, 5(3), 605-645.<br />

Quinlan, M., Mayhew, c., & bohle, p. (2001). the global expansion of precarious employment, work disorganisation, and<br />

consequences for occupational health: a review of recent research. International Journal of Health Services, 31(2), 335-414.<br />

case study 87. Poor workers in US agriculture. - the national economic and social rights initiative<br />

Modern day slavery around the world is ongoing and systematic in some sectors of the economy within the United<br />

states. in Florida, significant numbers of workers are in slavery and/or forced labour at any given moment in the agriculture<br />

industry. indeed, in the last decade, there have been six successful federal government criminal prosecutions in Florida for<br />

forced labour and slavery resulting in up to fifteen-year prison terms and the freeing of over 1,000 workers. in addition, there<br />

are ongoing cases under investigation by the department of Justice.<br />

Forced labour and slavery are driven by the economic and legal context in which farmworkers find themselves. these violations are<br />

enabled by discriminatory and inadequate labour laws, failure to ensure basic economic and social rights and increasingly concentrated<br />

buying power, which has driven down wages and fuelled inhumane working conditions. in no other sectors in the Us, outside of<br />

agriculture and domestic work, do employers have as much power over their employees. Farmworkers have long been excluded from<br />

the country’s most basic labour laws, including the national labor relations act (nlra), which means farmworkers can be legally fired<br />

for collective bargaining efforts. Farmworkers are also excluded from portions of the Fair labor standards act (Flsa), which regulates<br />

issues like minimum wage and overtime pay. there are also restrictions on immigration visas for farmworkers, which enable abuse. in<br />

particular, the H2-a visa increasingly used by farmworkers to work legally in the Us. has no employer portability; in other words, it is valid<br />

only for the existing employer. this hampers workers from protecting themselves against abuses, leaving them no options other than<br />

illegal work or returning home to where there may be no viable work and where they may not be able to pay off the sizeable debt<br />

accumulated to come to the Us. all of these components working together clearly enable human rights violations.<br />

Farmworkers are among the poorest, if not the poorest, labourers in the United states economy. When legal, they earn roughly<br />

$7,500 per year, which is far be<strong>low</strong> the national poverty line. Undocumented workers often earn less than half of that. Wages are kept<br />

<strong>low</strong> through illegal withholding of pay, enabled by inadequately enforced federal and state wage protection regulations. Farmworkers<br />

also generally earn less than the legal minimum wage because they are not compensated for time spent travelling between fields and<br />

harvests, time waiting for fields to dry before picking, and time waiting for crops to ripen. in addition, farmworkers' wages have not<br />

changed significantly in over twenty-five years. adjusted for inflation, this is a 65 per cent drop in income in the last quarter decade.<br />

Farmworkers rarely receive overtime pay. besides not being adequately compensated for their time, workers often do not have<br />

a choice as to whether they want to work overtime. they do not generally receive benefits such as health insurance, sick leave,<br />

vacation pay, and pensions. the number of farmworkers who do have access to either benefits from their employers or contributionbased<br />

and needs-based services has never been large and has been declining. Farmworkers’ lack of access to health insurance<br />

means they lack information about medical services, confront long travel times to medical facilities from their isolated labour<br />

camps, face language barriers and often encounter hostility from employers reluctant to report workplace injuries or illnesses. the<br />

failure to ensure farmworkers basic economic and social rights is also reflected in the substandard housing they inhabit. Workers<br />

often have no telephones, no cars, and neither heat nor air conditioning in the shacks and trailers they inhabit. overcrowding is both<br />

common and severe. twelve to fifteen people, or roughly three families, may live in a single-wide trailer, hanging sheets as dividing<br />

walls. Far from being cheap, a trailer such as the one just described can rent for up to $1,200 per month. shacks can rent for<br />

upwards of $200 a week, a square-footage rate approaching Manhattan’s, one of the highest rent districts in the Us.<br />

Source<br />

the national economic and social rights initiative. (2005). Modern day slavery in US Agriculture: Legal failure and corporate complicity.<br />

retrieved February 27, 2009, from http://www.nesri.org/fact_sheets_pubs/Modern day slavery in U.s. agriculture.pdf<br />

339

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!