08.01.2015 Views

Employmentweb_low

Employmentweb_low

Employmentweb_low

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

policies and interventions<br />

power relations (changing power relations between political<br />

and economic actors in society)<br />

entry point a pertains to those policies and interventions that<br />

change power relations between the leading political and economic<br />

actors. The repercussions of this change affect employment<br />

conditions. here we refer to power relations in a broad sense, not<br />

limited to the interaction of tradition political forces (for example,<br />

political parties), but including any actor that is essential for<br />

understanding the social context in a country. We include these<br />

actors because they are part of a pattern in which neo-liberal labour<br />

policies marginalise worker safeguards.<br />

Global growth in the levels of under-employment/disguised<br />

unemployment, precarious employment,<br />

informal work and child and bonded labour<br />

has both reflected and reinforced the<br />

disempowerment of workers and their<br />

industrial and political representatives<br />

(where these exist). even within the<br />

european Union (eU), the dominant neoliberal<br />

discourse underpinning integration,<br />

economic development and eU enlargement<br />

has progressively marginalised the role of<br />

unions and collective regulation (visser,<br />

2005; Woolfson, 2007). neo-liberalism, both<br />

as an ideology and as a set of policies, is<br />

antithetical to a strong collective voice in<br />

Trade unions demonstrate unity at a march in annecy on the occasion<br />

economic and social affairs on the behalf of<br />

of the nationwide strike on october 4, 2005 (France).<br />

workers and through which they can source: © ilo/M. crozet (2005)<br />

effectively articulate their interests.<br />

Weakened unions (visser, 2006) cannot safeguard workers in<br />

many countries, and the policies of social democratic/labour<br />

parties have been met with decreasing success. Workers’ rights<br />

centres (including those catering to immigrants, see cho et al.,<br />

2006), community groups, and broader social alliances (local,<br />

national and trans-national) provide a fulcrum for change. even<br />

when fragmented, their achievements include consumer boycotts<br />

and supply chain regulation in pursuit of improved labour<br />

standards and working conditions.<br />

yet policy frameworks fail to address the important role played by<br />

these organisations for the sake of preserving competition. at the<br />

international level, there is a double standard in terms of the<br />

enforceability of “investor” and “worker” rights (Taylor, 2000) as well<br />

as undue corporate influence on labour law standards in poor<br />

309

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!