08.01.2015 Views

Employmentweb_low

Employmentweb_low

Employmentweb_low

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

eMployMent relations and health inequalities: pathways and MechanisMs<br />

occupational classes—the <strong>low</strong>er the socioeconomic position, the higher the risk of exposure to adverse and stressful working<br />

conditions (siegrist, 2002).<br />

however, not all dimensions of stressful working conditions are more prevalent in <strong>low</strong>er ses occupations. higher job demands, as<br />

characterised by the job strain model, tend to be more prevalent in higher ses occupations (bosma et al., 1997). in addition, workers in higher<br />

ses jobs may be exposed to greater work effort, a characteristic of the effort-reward imbalance model (siegrist et al., 2004) on the other<br />

hand, <strong>low</strong>er job control (bosma et al., 1997) and fewer rewards (siegrist et al., 2004) tend to characterise <strong>low</strong>er ses occupations.<br />

Furthermore, when the social gradient in the overall measure of stressful working conditions (job strain and effort-reward imbalance) is<br />

analysed, rather than specific components, work stress tends to be reported primarily by those in <strong>low</strong>er ses occupations (tsutsumi, Kayaba,<br />

tsutsumi, & igarashi, 2001). even when greater effort-reward imbalance is reported by higher ses workers earlier on in their career, <strong>low</strong>er<br />

ses workers tend to report a greater deterioration in their working conditions over their career lifetime (chandola, siegrist, & Marmot, 2005).<br />

there is some debate about whether stressful working conditions account for some of the social gradient in health. <strong>low</strong> control,<br />

(bosma et al., 1997), job strain (chandola, brunner, & Marmot, 2006), and effort-reward imbalance (chandola et al., 2005) have been found<br />

to account for some of the social gradient in different measures of health. on the other hand, not all dimensions of adverse psychosocial<br />

working conditions contribute to explaining social inequalities in coronary heart disease (suadicani, hein, & gyntelberg, 1993). if stressful<br />

working conditions mediate the effect of ses on health, we would expect to find strong evidence of the association between <strong>low</strong> ses and<br />

stress-related biomarkers. there is some conflicting evidence from the scientific literature. some report that <strong>low</strong>er ses is not associated<br />

with biological markers for stress (dowd & goldman, 2006), while others find that <strong>low</strong>er ses is associated with higher biological stress<br />

responses in terms of a greater cortisol awakening response (wright & steptoe, 2005).<br />

in summary, adverse working conditions tend to cluster in <strong>low</strong>er ses occupations. Most of the studies show that some<br />

dimensions of stressful working conditions mediate or moderate the effect of social inequalities in health, although a minority of<br />

studies questions this link.<br />

References<br />

bosma, h., Marmot, M. g., hemingway, h., nicholson, a. c., brunner, e., & stansfeld, s. a. (1997). <strong>low</strong> job control and risk<br />

of coronary heart disease in whitehall ii (prospective cohort) study. British Medical Journal, 314, 558-565.<br />

chandola, t., brunner, e., & Marmot, M. (2006). chronic stress at work and the metabolic syndrome: prospective study.<br />

British Medical Journal, 332, 521-525.<br />

chandola, t., siegrist, J., & Marmot, M. (2005). do changes in effort-reward imbalance at work contribute to an explanation<br />

of the social gradient in angina Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 62, 223-230.<br />

dowd, J. b., & goldman, n. (2006). do biomarkers of stress mediate the relation between socioeconomic status and health<br />

Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 60, 633-639.<br />

siegrist, J. (2002). reducing social inequalities in health: work-related strategies. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health.<br />

Supplement, 59, 49-53.<br />

siegrist, J., starke, d., chandola, t., godin, i., Marmot, M., niedhammer, i., et al. (2004). the measurement of effort-reward<br />

imbalance at work: european comparisons. Social Science and Medicine, 58, 1483-99.<br />

suadicani, p., hein, h. o., & gyntelberg, F. (1993). are social inequalities as associated with the risk of ischaemic heart<br />

disease a result of psychosocial working conditions Atherosclerosis, 101, 165-175.<br />

tsutsumi, a., Kayaba, K., tsutsumi, K., & igarashi, M. (2001). association between job strain and prevalence of hypertension:<br />

a cross sectional analysis in a Japanese working population with a wide range of occupations: the Jichi Medical school<br />

cohort study. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 58, 367-373.<br />

wright, c. e., & steptoe, a. (2005). subjective socioeconomic position, gender and cortisol responses to waking in an elderly<br />

population. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 30, 582-590.<br />

effect modifiers of the health effects of adverse working<br />

conditions<br />

another pathway assumes that social health inequalities emerge<br />

because of social differences in susceptibility to adverse working<br />

conditions – even with similar types and levels of exposure<br />

(diderichsen, evans, & Whitehead, 2001; emslie, hunt, &<br />

Macintyre, 1999a). This mechanism is functioning at the same time<br />

as, sometimes even cross-cutting, the mechanism of differential<br />

exposure. differences in susceptibility (i.e., effect modification)<br />

275

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!