08.01.2015 Views

Employmentweb_low

Employmentweb_low

Employmentweb_low

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

policies and interventions<br />

case study 99. Potential explanations for the recent positive trends in employment conditions in brazil. - vilma santana<br />

informal work has grown in brazil between 1992 and 1999, when it became 56 per cent of the labor force. this was worse in the<br />

countryside, where some municipalities had up to 70 per cent rates of informal jobs (instituto brasileiro de geografia e estatística [ibge],<br />

2007). several hypotheses about the potential causes of this situation have been debated by academics and government officials, who<br />

considered informality as a major drawback for productivity and economic growth. a number of economic reasons have been raised<br />

(pochman, 2000; barros & Mendonça, 1996; Mckinsey & company, 2004) such as high taxes to hire and maintain a formally employed<br />

worker, bureaucratic difficulties and high taxes to register small firms, which would encourage small entrepreneurs to keep their business<br />

illegally unregistered and employees not legally hired. indeed, for each formally hired worker in brazil, taxes are 100 per cent of the<br />

corresponding wage, one of the highest rates in the world. there are also complaints about the high burden of presumed workers'<br />

privileges that are rights assured by the labor law enacted in the late 1940's. although there has been too much pressure to reduce<br />

workers' protection such as job stability, indemnities for unjustified firing and labor-related taxes, there has also been organised resistance<br />

by labour unions and social movements against these proposed changes. between 1999 and 2008, without any important change in labour<br />

legislation, taxation policy or social insurance norms or coverage, there has been a minor but steady decrease in the country’s informal<br />

employment rate (see Figure). during this time, there has been a historical strengthening of social policies focusing on the poor. thus,<br />

among the social initiatives focusing mainly the extreme poor are educational incentive programmes and, for creating small firms, cash<br />

transfer programmes such us the bolsa-escola, and a national programme against child labour. More recently, there was a reduction of<br />

the interest rate and an expansion of credit, increasing internal consumption and demand, which boosted economic production. cash<br />

transfer programmes apparently played an important role for the increase of internal consumption. along with the decrease of informal<br />

jobs, there have been other positive changes regarding employment conditions and income distribution. Unemployment also fell from 12.1<br />

per cent to 8.5 per cent between 1999 and 2008.<br />

the brazilian economy has been growing and social inequalities have been falling steadily, as shown by a decrease in the gini index.<br />

national population-based surveys have also shown that the proportion of the extreme poor and that of the working poor are falling, although<br />

the latter is doing so on a smaller scale. no major changes in the labour law occurred during this time. this provides evidence that, without<br />

the flexibility of workers' rights or tax reduction, it is possible to change a scenario of unjust employment conditions and improve economic<br />

growth. in spite of the moderate improvement in employment conditions, the current poor indicators of occupational health and safety reveal<br />

not only the need to establish stronger policies to keep improving employment conditions for both informal and formal workers, but also the<br />

need of interventions to substantially improve working conditions and the effective application of existing norms and regulations.<br />

Figure. proportion of informal jobs in Brazil (1992-2004).*<br />

percentage<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007<br />

years<br />

source: pesquisa nacional por amostra de domicilios (pnad, ibge).<br />

*definition of informality: (workers without formal contracts + own account workers) / (protected workers + workers<br />

without formal contracts + own account workers)<br />

references<br />

barros, r. p., & Mendonça, r. (1996). os determinantes da desigualdade no brasil. in A economia brasileira em perspectiva<br />

(pp. 412-473). rio de Janeiro: instituto de pesquisa e economia aplicada.<br />

instituto brasileiro de geografia e estatística. (2007). retrieved from http://www.ibge.gov.br/english/<br />

Mckinsey & company. (2004). Eliminando as barreiras ao crescimento econômico e a economia formal no Brasil. retrieved<br />

February 27, 2009, from http://www.mckinsey.com/ideas/pdf/diagnostico_da_informalidade-final.pdf<br />

pochman, M. (2000). O trabalho sob fogo cruzado (2nd ed.). são paulo: editora contexto.<br />

355

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!