28.03.2015 Views

End of Year Report - Richland College

End of Year Report - Richland College

End of Year Report - Richland College

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

104<br />

KPI 3.4 Proactively manage turnover and diversity<br />

<strong>Richland</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

3.4.1 % <strong>of</strong> fulltime employee turnover for the academic year<br />

Operational Measure*<br />

Target Range<br />

Performance<br />

% <strong>of</strong> max. target range<br />

< 12.10 – 11.00<br />

= 20.45<br />

= 14.10%<br />

Leadership tracks the percentage <strong>of</strong> fulltime employee turnover to ensure that <strong>Richland</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

has the employee capacity to achieve the college’s mission. Due to several factors, the magnitude<br />

<strong>of</strong> which could not be anticipated, <strong>Richland</strong> experienced the largest employee turnover<br />

in its history with 134 employees. Significant cuts in state funding and local tax base funding<br />

to the DCCCD caused the college to employ a reduction in force among administrative and<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional support staff. The DCCCD also <strong>of</strong>fered an aggressive retirement incentive which<br />

resulted in the loss <strong>of</strong> 27 long-serving faculty, 9 administrators, and 32 pr<strong>of</strong>essional support<br />

staff. Additionally, five faculty left to pursue other opportunities as did 15 administrators and 46<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional support staff. Performance for this measure<br />

●●<br />

falls well below the target range<br />

●●<br />

represents a non-beneficial increase over 2009-10 (see Figure 3.4.1)<br />

●●<br />

represents <strong>of</strong>f the chart retirements (n=68) compared to the 2009-10 National Community<br />

<strong>College</strong> Benchmark figures<br />

●●<br />

represents a high percentage <strong>of</strong> non-retiree (n=66) departures compared to the 2009-10<br />

National Community <strong>College</strong> Benchmark figures (see Table 3.4.1)<br />

Leadership decreased the rigor for 2011-12 by increasing the target to 13.00 based on expectations<br />

<strong>of</strong> additional mid-year retirements due to the second phase <strong>of</strong> the DCCCD voluntary retirement<br />

incentive option.<br />

Turnover Rate (%)<br />

22.0<br />

20.0<br />

18.0<br />

16.0<br />

14.0<br />

12.0<br />

10.0<br />

8.0<br />

6.0<br />

4.0<br />

2.0<br />

0.0<br />

Figure 3.4.1<br />

RLC 90% <strong>of</strong> Target 100% <strong>of</strong> Target<br />

Good<br />

Employee Turnover for Full-time Staff<br />

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11<br />

Source: DCCCD Colleague System<br />

*Strategic measures are those identified for special emphasis by college leadership, the DCCCD Board <strong>of</strong> Trustees, the state or national government, or<br />

SACS accreditation agency. Operational measures are those key to the ongoing vitality <strong>of</strong> the organization but without strategic emphasis.<br />

<strong>End</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Year</strong> <strong>Report</strong> 2010-11<br />

NCCBP Benchmark Group<br />

AY2009-2010<br />

10th<br />

Percentile<br />

25th<br />

Percentile<br />

Median<br />

75th<br />

Percentile<br />

90th<br />

Percentile<br />

% <strong>Year</strong> Retirements 0.56% 1.27% 2.13% 0.03% 0.04%<br />

% <strong>Year</strong> Departures 1.86% 3.05% 4.86% 0.07% 0.11%<br />

Table 3.4.1<br />

Source: NCCBP 2009, 2010 <strong>Report</strong>s, RLC EOY <strong>Report</strong>s 2008-09, 2009-10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!