End of Year Report - Richland College
End of Year Report - Richland College
End of Year Report - Richland College
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Strategic Planning Priority Goal #2: Empower All Students to Suc<br />
<strong>Richland</strong> <strong>College</strong> 41<br />
Strategic Planning Priority Goal #2:<br />
Empower All Students to Succeed<br />
Score = 9.4<br />
Introduction<br />
<strong>Richland</strong> <strong>College</strong> tracks 3 Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) with a combined total <strong>of</strong> 35 measures.<br />
Sixteen strategic* measures focus on the performance <strong>of</strong> all credit students. Another 16 strategic*<br />
measures focus on the same performance metrics but with a specific focus on African-American<br />
and Hispanic students which represent the Closing the Gaps student population. Three operational*<br />
measures focus on student satisfaction with college practices and services to support student learning.<br />
<strong>Richland</strong> groups its student performance metrics into 3 categories (1) % A, B, C grades, (2) %<br />
in-class retention, (3) goal completion. Leadership tracks these measures because student success<br />
is <strong>Richland</strong>’s reason for being and environmental scanning indicates that the Texas Legislature is<br />
moving ever closer to performance-based funding for higher education. Following is a summary <strong>of</strong><br />
performance to target for each <strong>of</strong> the 3 KPIs that serve to indicate how well <strong>Richland</strong> <strong>College</strong> Empowers<br />
All Students to Succeed.<br />
Organizational Objectives/KPIs Performance Summary<br />
2.1 Score = 9.47<br />
Monitor and Improve Student Success reflects a score decrease <strong>of</strong> 0.05 points compared to<br />
2009-10. Four <strong>of</strong> 16 measures scored above the target range while 9 measures scored within<br />
the target range. Two measures scored within 5 percentage points <strong>of</strong> the target range and 1<br />
measure scored well below. This KPI leverages the core competencies <strong>of</strong> strategic performance<br />
improvement and seamless transitions for lifelong learning to address our strategic challenges <strong>of</strong><br />
improving student success with a student population that is increasingly underprepared for college<br />
work and Closing the Gaps in student success.<br />
2.2 Score = 9.17<br />
Monitor and Improve Student Success for Historically Underserved Student Groups<br />
reflects a score decrease <strong>of</strong> 0.34 points compared to 2009-10. Measures <strong>of</strong> student success<br />
are identical to those mentioned in KPI 2.1 but are segmented to include a focus on African-<br />
American and Hispanic student groups, consistent with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating<br />
Board’s Closing the Gaps mandate. Two <strong>of</strong> the sixteen measures exceed the target range, 11<br />
measures score within the target range, and 1 measure scores within 5 points <strong>of</strong> the target range<br />
and 2 measures fall well below the target range. This KPI leverages the core competencies <strong>of</strong><br />
strategic performance improvement, seamless transitions for lifelong learning, and sustainable<br />
community building for social equity and justice to address our strategic challenges <strong>of</strong> improving<br />
student success with a student population that is increasingly underprepared for college work<br />
and Closing the Gaps in student success.<br />
*Strategic measures are those identified for special emphasis by college leadership, the DCCCD Board <strong>of</strong> Trustees, the state or national government, or<br />
SACS accreditation agency. Operational measures are those key to the ongoing vitality <strong>of</strong> the organization but without strategic emphasis.<br />
<strong>End</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Year</strong> <strong>Report</strong> 2010-11