Potential Effects of Contaminants on Fraser River Sockeye Salmon

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 4.15. Summary <strong>of</strong> the available surface-water chemistry data for reference areas within the Fraser River Basin.Life Stage/Class/AnalytennDetect% Non-DetectMeanSDGeometricMeanMinMaxPercentile Distribution5th 10th 25th 50th 75th 90th 95thAdult Upstream MigrationConventionalsHardness (mg/L) 200 200 0% 60.1 6.44 59.7 19.4 80.2 51.5 53.5 56.2 60 63.7 68.5 70.2Dissolved Oxygen (mg/L) 38 38 0% 9.56 0.498 9.54 8.4 11 8.79 8.87 9.2 9.65 9.9 10 10pH (pH units) 193 193 0% 7.89 0.223 7.88 6.9 8.2 7.4 7.7 7.87 7.94 8 8.05 8.1Residue Non-filterable (TSS; mg/L) 76 33 57% 6.21 3.02 5.75 2.5 21 5 5 5 5 5 10 11.5Temperature (C) 198 198 0% 9.95 2.43 9.6 2 16 6 7 8.5 10 11.5 13 14Turbidity (NTU) 203 203 0% 2.81 2.69 2.09 0.05 22.1 0.555 0.892 1.4 2.17 3.34 4.84 6.49Nutrients (µg/L)Nitrate (NO 3 ), dissolved 57 57 0% 43 21.7 37.2 7 85 14.6 19.6 26 37 60 76 82.2Nitrogen - Nitrite, dissolved (NO 2 ) 57 33 42% 3.75 3.11 2.85 1 22 1 1 1 5 5 5 5Phosphorus, total (stream) 111 105 5% 6.93 10.4 4.98 1 103 1.15 2 3.8 5 7 11 14Major Ions (mg/L)Chloride, dissolved 203 156 23% 0.426 1.2 0.312 0.1 17 0.2 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6Fluoride, total 34 34 0% 0.0297 0.019 0.0256 0.01 0.1 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.064Sulfate, dissolved 142 142 0% 12.2 2.23 12 7.6 19 8.91 9.4 10.6 12.1 14 15 16Metals (µg/L)Aluminum, total 133 133 0% 152 71.8 139 43.3 522 78.2 89.6 111 135 167 232 290Arsenic, total 119 99 17% 0.153 0.261 NA 0.02 2.2 0.05 0.05 0.08 0.1 0.14 0.2 0.21Boron, total 37 26 30% 0.688 0.483 0.382 0.05 1.4 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.9 1.1 1.2 1.3Cadmium, total 76 72 5% 0.122 0.467 NA 5E-04 4 0.000875 0.0025 0.004 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2Chromium, total 146 123 16% 0.538 1.52 NA 0.045 16.9 0.0723 0.086 0.1 0.2 0.4 1.15 1.85Cobalt, total 146 146 0% 0.377 0.178 NA 0.1 1.2 0.184 0.2 0.3 0.367 0.433 0.6 0.7Copper, total 166 164 1% 2.82 9.35 NA 0.1 108 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.815 1.3 3.9 9.6Iron, total 174 174 0% 153 114 126 36 758 54.7 63.4 87 118 172 276 401Lead, total 166 105 37% 0.317 0.386 NA 0.029 2.8 0.0773 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.388 0.7 0.9Manganese, total 166 159 4% 12 4.82 NA 1 31.6 5.55 6.7 8.8 11.2 14.1 17.3 20.4Mercury, total 28 28 0% 18.1 12 15.3 6 50 7.05 9.7 10 18 20 28.5 48.6Molybdenum, total 146 93 36% 0.076 0.0487 NA 0.034 0.5 0.047 0.05 0.05 0.0515 0.1 0.1 0.1Nickel, total 138 138 0% 2.47 0.814 NA 0.7 5.6 1.39 1.67 1.9 2.4 2.85 3.48 3.75T-136
Table 4.15. Summary <strong>of</strong> the available surface-water chemistry data for reference areas within the Fraser River Basin.Life Stage/Class/AnalytennDetect% Non-DetectMeanSDGeometricMeanMinMaxPercentile Distribution5th 10th 25th 50th 75th 90th 95thMetals (µg/L; continued)Selenium, total 119 39 67% 0.086 0.117 NA 0.025 0.97 0.025 0.025 0.05 0.05 0.1 0.2 0.223Silver, total 100 38 62% 0.0489 0.0684 NA 5E-04 0.6 0.0005 0.0005 0.001 0.05 0.05 0.1 0.1Smolt OutmigrationConventionalsHardness (mg/L) 94 94 0% 68.3 6.62 68 53.9 82.1 57.1 59.9 63.4 68.6 73.3 76.6 78.9Dissolved Oxygen (mg/L) 18 18 0% 10.1 0.946 10 6.8 11 9.35 9.87 9.93 10 10.8 11 11pH (pH units) 92 92 0% 7.86 0.291 7.86 6.6 8.22 7.21 7.4 7.88 7.95 8 8.1 8.1Residue Non-filterable (TSS; mg/L) 31 12 61% 5.16 1.82 4.89 2.5 10 2.5 2.5 5 5 5 5 10Temperature (C) 96 96 0% 6.84 2.38 6.37 1.5 12.5 3.38 4 5 7 8 10 11.3Turbidity (NTU) 96 96 0% 1.29 1.18 0.83 0.07 6.3 0.168 0.2 0.4 0.925 1.93 2.55 3.63Nutrients (µg/L)Nitrate (NO 3 ), dissolved 28 28 0% 71.9 12.2 70.6 30 94 55.8 59.7 67 72 80 83.3 84.7Nitrogen - Nitrite, dissolved (NO 2 ) 28 13 54% 3.73 4.01 2.62 1 22 1 1 1 2.5 5 5 5Phosphorus, total (stream) 50 43 14% 4.21 3.63 3.3 1 20 1 1 2 4 5 7 7.78Major Ions (mg/L)Chloride, dissolved 96 80 17% 0.646 1.71 0.436 0.1 17 0.245 0.25 0.3 0.4 0.553 0.7 0.9Fluoride, total 13 13 0% 0.0269 0.0184 0.0227 0.01 0.08 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.038 0.056Sulfate, dissolved 65 65 0% 13.3 2.45 13 8.6 19 9.44 10.1 11.7 13 14.9 16.4 17.8Metals (µg/L)Aluminum, total 61 61 0% 85.5 44.6 74.9 32 218 35 40 47.3 73.3 119 144 163Boron, total 18 14 22% 0.744 0.516 0.45 0.05 1.5 0.05 0.05 0.3 0.8 1.1 1.4 1.42Cadmium, total 29 28 3% 0.106 0.266 0.0148 5E-04 1.1 0.0014 0.0028 0.004 0.005 0.1 0.1 0.64Chromium, total 67 51 24% 0.584 1.23 0.218 0.031 8.8 0.0496 0.0574 0.1 0.169 0.4 1.58 2.27Cobalt, total 67 64 4% 0.23 0.121 0.198 0.05 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.128 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.403Copper, total 75 74 1% 3.4 14.1 1.05 0.1 122 0.394 0.454 0.5 0.8 1.5 3.9 10.5Iron, total 79 79 0% 98.4 82.9 75.2 17.8 615 22.8 24.7 40.2 86.1 125 170 203Lead, total 75 44 41% 0.288 0.373 0.162 0.014 2 0.0278 0.0556 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.8 1.03Manganese, total 75 72 4% 8.29 3.56 7.39 1 17.5 2.94 3.82 5.5 8.3 10.2 12.9 14T-137
Page 1:
February 2011technical report 2<str
Page 6 and 7:
thresholds), which represent lowest
Page 8 and 9:
Table of ContentsE
Page 10 and 11:
5.5 Summary of the
Page 12 and 13:
List of TablesTabl
Page 14 and 15:
Table 4.17Table 4.18Table 4.19Table
Page 16 and 17:
Table 4.47Table 4.48Table 4.49Table
Page 18 and 19:
Table 6.4Table 8.1Compounds for Nat
Page 20 and 21:
Figure 3.17 Map of
Page 23 and 24:
Figure 5.20 Late Stuart Sockeye Sal
Page 25 and 26:
List of Acronyms2,
Page 27 and 28:
AcknowledgementsThe authors would l
Page 29 and 30:
To assist it in fulfilling this man
Page 31 and 32:
• Development of
Page 33 and 34:
Chapter 2 Geographic and Temporal S
Page 35 and 36:
life history of th
Page 37 and 38:
• Pitt River Area of</str
Page 39 and 40:
Chapter 3 Inventory of</str
Page 41 and 42:
and Paper Mills - Canfor Pulp Limit
Page 43 and 44:
3.1.1.2 Sawmills, Plywood Mills and
Page 45 and 46:
(ENKON Environmental Ltd. 2001). Co
Page 47 and 48:
Effluent toxicity was also included
Page 49 and 50:
2011 for more information on the lo
Page 51 and 52:
facilities identified in Table 3.11
Page 53 and 54:
Inc.), poultry processing facilitie
Page 55 and 56:
• Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon
Page 57 and 58:
3.1.1.11 Municipal Wastewater Treat
Page 59 and 60:
• Personal care products (fragran
Page 61 and 62:
with oxytetracycline, ormetoprim, a
Page 63 and 64:
In summary, the contaminants that c
Page 65 and 66:
insecticides, such as phorate, terb
Page 67 and 68:
3.1.2.4 Runoff fro
Page 69 and 70:
the substances most amenable to lon
Page 71 and 72:
• Plastic-related compounds (i.e.
Page 73 and 74:
were used in the effects and exposu
Page 75 and 76:
warrants further assessment to dete
Page 77 and 78:
• Data collected for migration co
Page 79 and 80:
Hazard quotients were calculated fo
Page 81 and 82:
Many other substances have the pote
Page 83 and 84:
Chapter 5 Evaluation of</st
Page 85 and 86:
For surface water and sediment, the
Page 87 and 88:
3. For hardness-dependent water qua
Page 89 and 90:
• 2,3,7,8-TCDD toxic equivalents
Page 91 and 92:
concern by area of
Page 93 and 94:
0.05 mg/L; Glew and Hames 1971). As
Page 95 and 96:
least time rearing in freshwater ha
Page 97 and 98:
The results of thi
Page 99 and 100:
Interest and in the South Thompson
Page 101 and 102:
• Polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxi
Page 103 and 104:
glycoproteins, polypeptides, peptid
Page 105 and 106:
In-use herbicides in the Fraser Riv
Page 107 and 108:
and home wood heating; Johannessen
Page 109 and 110:
Pulp and paper mills, saw mills, an
Page 111 and 112:
salinity tolerance were significant
Page 113 and 114:
and gonadosomatic index scores were
Page 115 and 116:
the lowest observed effect concentr
Page 117 and 118:
Spitsbergen et al. (1991) reported
Page 119 and 120:
Chakravorty et al. (1992) observed
Page 121 and 122:
observed in saltwater gobies (Chasm
Page 123 and 124:
(See Chapters 4 and 5 for further i
Page 125 and 126:
emoval efficiency of</stron
Page 127 and 128:
point and non-point source discharg
Page 129 and 130:
Location of NatalS
Page 131 and 132:
Nevertheless, it is possible that e
Page 133 and 134:
concern relative to human or enviro
Page 135 and 136:
these substances to aquatic ecosyst
Page 137 and 138:
• Alkylphenol ethoxylates (APEOs;
Page 139 and 140:
chemicals of poten
Page 141 and 142:
productivity data, it is apparent t
Page 143 and 144:
• Sufficiency - For a cause and e
Page 145 and 146:
infection by various disease agents
Page 147 and 148:
magnitude, and spatial extent <stro
Page 149 and 150:
potential concern were documented a
Page 151 and 152:
pathways and the intensity and exte
Page 153 and 154:
Chilko River, Quesnel River, Nechak
Page 155 and 156:
• The majority of</strong
Page 157 and 158:
7.4.6 Information on Interactive <s
Page 159 and 160:
• Development of
Page 161 and 162:
8.4 Preliminary Evaluation
Page 163 and 164:
8.5 Evaluation of
Page 165 and 166:
the low returns of
Page 167 and 168:
8.9 RecommendationsThis evaluation
Page 169 and 170:
Chapter 9 References CitedAdams, R.
Page 171 and 172:
Braune, B., D. Muir, B. DeMarch, M.
Page 173 and 174:
EIP Associates. 1997. Polychlorinat
Page 175 and 176:
Gallaugher, P. and L. Wood (Eds). P
Page 177 and 178:
Hinch, S.G. and E.G. Martins. 2011.
Page 179 and 180:
Kemble, N.E., D.K. Hardesty, C.G. I
Page 181 and 182:
MacLatchy, D., L. Peters, J. Nickle
Page 183 and 184:
Milston, R.H., M.S. Fitzpatrick, A.
Page 185 and 186:
Peterman, R.M., D. Marmorek, B. Bec
Page 187 and 188:
Smith, D.B., R.A. Zielinski, H.E. T
Page 189 and 190:
USACE (U.S. Army Corps of</
Page 191 and 192:
Walker, M.K., J.M. Spitsbergen, J.R
Page 193 and 194:
Table 2.1. Overview of</str
Page 195 and 196:
Table 2.2. Sampling sites for Early
Page 197 and 198:
Table 2.3. Sampling sites for summe
Page 199 and 200:
Table 2.4. Sampling sites for river
Page 201 and 202:
Table 3.1. Listing of</stro
Page 203 and 204:
Table 3.2. Chemicals of</st
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Table 3.8. Major pipelines transpor
Page 221 and 222:
Table 3.10. Locations of</s
Page 223 and 224:
Table 3.11. Listing of</str
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241 and 242:
Table 3.16. List of</strong
Page 243 and 244:
Table 3.17. List of</strong
Page 245 and 246:
Table 3.18. Location of</st
Page 247 and 248:
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253 and 254:
Page 255 and 256:
Page 257 and 258:
Page 259 and 260:
Table 3.20. Summary of</str
Page 261 and 262:
Page 263 and 264:
Page 265 and 266:
Page 267 and 268:
Table 3.23. Estimated annual contam
Page 269 and 270:
Page 271 and 272:
Page 273 and 274:
Page 275 and 276:
Table 3.28. Inventory of</s
Page 277 and 278: Table 3.28. Inventory of</s
Page 283 and 284: Table 4.1. Selected toxicity screen
Page 285 and 286: Table 4.2. Selected toxicity screen
Page 287 and 288: Table 4.3. Summary of</stro
Page 309 and 310: Table 4.10. Summary of</str
Page 327: Table 4.14. Summary of</str
Page 337 and 338: Table 4.19. Evaluation of</
Page 361 and 362: Table 4.32. Frequency of</s
Page 379 and 380:
Table 4.42. Frequency of</s
Page 381 and 382:
Page 383 and 384:
Page 385 and 386:
Page 387 and 388:
Page 389 and 390:
Page 391 and 392:
Page 393 and 394:
Page 395 and 396:
Page 397 and 398:
Table 4.51. Evaluation of</
Page 399 and 400:
Page 401 and 402:
Table 4.53. Identification
Page 403 and 404:
Table 5.1. Selected toxicity refere
Page 405 and 406:
Table 5.2. Selected toxicity refere
Page 407 and 408:
Table 5.3. Exposure point concentra
Page 409 and 410:
Page 411 and 412:
Page 413 and 414:
Table 5.9. Hazard quotients <strong
Page 415 and 416:
Table 5.11. Hazard quotients <stron
Page 417 and 418:
Page 419 and 420:
Page 421 and 422:
Page 423 and 424:
Page 425 and 426:
Page 427 and 428:
Page 429 and 430:
Page 431 and 432:
Table 5.19. Hazard quotients <stron
Page 433 and 434:
Page 435 and 436:
Page 437 and 438:
Table 5.23. Mean concentrations <st
Page 439 and 440:
Table 6.2. Effects
Page 441 and 442:
Table 6.3. Field studies of
Page 443 and 444:
Table 6.4. Compounds for National r
Page 445 and 446:
Table 8.1. Inventory of</st
Page 447 and 448:
Page 449 and 450:
Page 451 and 452:
Page 453 and 454:
Page 455 and 456:
Page 457 and 458:
Page 459 and 460:
Figures
Page 461 and 462:
F-2
Page 463 and 464:
F-4
Page 465 and 466:
F-6
Page 467 and 468:
F-8
Page 469 and 470:
F-10
Page 471 and 472:
F-12
Page 473 and 474:
F-14
Page 475 and 476:
F-16
Page 477 and 478:
F-18
Page 479 and 480:
F-20
Page 481 and 482:
F-22
Page 483 and 484:
F-24
Page 485 and 486:
F-26
Page 487 and 488:
F-28
Page 489 and 490:
F-30
Page 491 and 492:
F-32
Page 493 and 494:
F-34
Page 495 and 496:
F-36
Page 497 and 498:
F-38
Page 499 and 500:
F-40
Page 501 and 502:
F-42
Page 503 and 504:
F-44
Page 505 and 506:
F-46
Page 507 and 508:
F-48
Page 509 and 510:
F-50
Page 511 and 512:
F-52
Page 513 and 514:
F-54
Page 515 and 516:
F-56
Page 517 and 518:
F-58
Page 519 and 520:
F-60
Page 521 and 522:
F-62
Page 523 and 524:
Figure 5.1. Water Quality Index sco
Page 525 and 526:
Figure 5.3. Fraser River Sockeye Sa
Page 527 and 528:
Figure 5.5. Pitt Sockeye Salmon Pro
Page 529 and 530:
Figure 5.7. Weaver Sockeye Salmon P
Page 531 and 532:
Figure 5.9. Cultus Sockeye Salmon P
Page 533 and 534:
Figure 5.11. Portage Sockeye Salmon
Page 535 and 536:
Figure 5.13. Fennell Sockeye Salmon
Page 537 and 538:
Figure 5.15. Late Shuswap Sockeye S
Page 539 and 540:
Figure 5.17. Chilko Sockeye Salmon
Page 541 and 542:
Figure 5.19. Early Stuart Sockeye S
Page 543 and 544:
Figure 5.21. Stellako Sockeye Salmo
Page 545 and 546:
Figure 5.23. Bowron Sockeye Salmon
Page 547 and 548:
Appendices
Page 549 and 550:
SW4 Deliverables4.1 The Contractor
Page 551 and 552:
obtained on one species, sometimes
Page 553 and 554:
• For substances for which the se
Page 555 and 556:
WeaknessesThere is a lot of
Page 557 and 558:
Pg 110 Ln 4189 - now called Listene
Page 559 and 560:
the potential effects of</s
Page 561 and 562:
A-14
Page 563 and 564:
4. Fish processing plants are fewer
Page 565 and 566:
Appendix 3. Environmental Data Sour
Page 567 and 568:
4. Keyword searches for water quali
Page 569 and 570:
A3.5 Contaminant Spill ReportsData
Page 571 and 572:
River Pulp, Kamloops Cellulose Fibr
Page 573 and 574:
Table A3.1. Water quality stations
Page 575 and 576:
Table A3.1. Water quality stations
Page 577 and 578:
Appendix 4. Data Treatment and Meth
Page 579 and 580:
when multiple samples were reported
Page 581 and 582:
$ Early rearing of
Page 583 and 584:
i) The number of t
Page 585 and 586:
In addition, some sockeye salmon (e
Page 587 and 588:
• Selecting probable effect conce
Page 589 and 590:
deBruyn, A.M., H. deBruyn, M.G. Iko
Page 591 and 592:
Appendix 5. Data description and so
Page 593 and 594:
Page 595 and 596:
Page 597 and 598:
Page 599 and 600:
Page 601 and 602:
Page 603:
show all

Potential Effects of Contaminants on Fraser River Sockeye Salmon

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?