11.07.2015 Views

Potential Effects of Contaminants on Fraser River Sockeye Salmon

Potential Effects of Contaminants on Fraser River Sockeye Salmon

Potential Effects of Contaminants on Fraser River Sockeye Salmon

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

• Estimating realistic exposure point c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s;• Identifying salm<strong>on</strong>id-specific toxicity thresholds; and,• Calculating effect-based hazard quotients.Three types <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> data were used to evaluate risks to sockeye salm<strong>on</strong> associated withexposure to the c<strong>on</strong>taminants <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>cern, including surface-water chemistry, sedimentchemistry, and fish-tissue chemistry data. The results <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> this assessment indicate thatexposure to c<strong>on</strong>taminated surface water and sediment or accumulati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>taminants infish tissues pose potential hazards to sockeye salm<strong>on</strong> utilizing spawning, rearing, ormigrati<strong>on</strong> habitats within the <strong>Fraser</strong> <strong>River</strong> Basin. More specifically, these results indicatenumerous c<strong>on</strong>taminants <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>cern occur in <strong>on</strong>e or more habitats at c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>ssufficient to adversely affect the survival, growth, or reproducti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>Fraser</strong> <strong>River</strong> sockeyesalm<strong>on</strong>. These substances include TSS, six metals (aluminum, chromium, copper, ir<strong>on</strong>,mercury and silver), and phenols (Table 5.18). However, the results <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> supplementalanalysis <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the available data indicate that water quality c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s in freshwater habitats,as indicated by the c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the c<strong>on</strong>taminants <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>cern included in the waterquality index, are likely not the primary factor influencing sockeye salm<strong>on</strong> productivity inthe study area. These supplemental results showed that water quality (as indicated bywater quality index scores) does not exhibit str<strong>on</strong>g temporal trends, as would be expectedif the declines in sockeye salm<strong>on</strong> abundance over the past 20 years were primarily causedby water quality impairments. In additi<strong>on</strong>, the productivity <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> sockeye salm<strong>on</strong> (asindicated by life-cycle Ricker residuals) was not correlated with water quality index scoresin a way that would suggest that water quality c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s are playing a significant role indictating sockeye salm<strong>on</strong> abundance. However, the observed results <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the analysis andthe limitati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> the available data make it difficult to c<strong>on</strong>clude that water quality is not afactor that has c<strong>on</strong>tributed to the declines <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> sockeye salm<strong>on</strong> in the study area since about1990. Decreases in the productivity <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> sockeye salm<strong>on</strong> stocks that utilize freshwaterhabitats for extended period <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> time implicates freshwater c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s as a factorc<strong>on</strong>tributing to the declines <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> this species in the <strong>Fraser</strong> <strong>River</strong> Basin. Further evaluati<strong>on</strong> isneeded to elucidate the roles <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> suspended sediments in spawning habitats, sedimentdepositi<strong>on</strong> in incubati<strong>on</strong> habitats, and nutrients in rearing habitats <strong>on</strong> sockeye salm<strong>on</strong>productivity and abundance.Exposure to c<strong>on</strong>taminated sediments also has the potential to adversely affect sockeyesalm<strong>on</strong> in the <strong>Fraser</strong> <strong>River</strong> basin. Although the available data were limited, the results <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>the risk assessment showed that ir<strong>on</strong> and/or nickel occurred in sediments at c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>ssufficient to adversely affect exposed sockeye salm<strong>on</strong> in the Lower <strong>Fraser</strong> <strong>River</strong> Area <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>71

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!