11.07.2015 Views

Potential Effects of Contaminants on Fraser River Sockeye Salmon

Potential Effects of Contaminants on Fraser River Sockeye Salmon

Potential Effects of Contaminants on Fraser River Sockeye Salmon

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

thresholds), which represent lowest observed effect levels <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>taminants <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>cern forsockeye salm<strong>on</strong> or other salm<strong>on</strong>id fishes. The results <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> this assessment indicated thatexposure to c<strong>on</strong>taminated surface water and sediment or accumulati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>taminants infish tissues pose potential hazards to sockeye salm<strong>on</strong> utilizing spawning, rearing, ormigrati<strong>on</strong> habitats within the <strong>Fraser</strong> <strong>River</strong> Basin. The substances that occurred in water atc<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s sufficient to adversely affect the survival, growth, or reproducti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><strong>Fraser</strong> <strong>River</strong> sockeye salm<strong>on</strong> included total suspended solids, six metals (aluminum,chromium, copper, ir<strong>on</strong>, mercury and silver), and phenols. However, analyses <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> waterquality index scores and measures <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> productivity (i.e., Ricker residuals) suggested thatdeclines in sockeye salm<strong>on</strong> abundance over the past 20 years or in 2009 were not likelycaused by the substances c<strong>on</strong>sidered in the water quality index. While the results <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> thesediment risk assessment showed that the c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> ir<strong>on</strong> and nickel were elevatedat various locati<strong>on</strong>s within the basin, exposure to these c<strong>on</strong>taminants <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>cern insediment is unlikely to be sufficient to adversely affect the survival, growth orreproducti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> sockeye salm<strong>on</strong>. Nevertheless, the c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> selenium, and2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin toxic equivalents, occurred or are likely to haveoccurred in salm<strong>on</strong> eggs at c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s sufficient to adversely affect sockeye salm<strong>on</strong>reproducti<strong>on</strong>.ES1.4 Evaluati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Effects</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals and <str<strong>on</strong>g>C<strong>on</strong>taminants</str<strong>on</strong>g><str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Emerging C<strong>on</strong>cernDue to limitati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> the availability <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> exposure data and/or toxicity thresholds, aqualitative evaluati<strong>on</strong> was c<strong>on</strong>ducted to assess the potential effects <strong>on</strong> <strong>Fraser</strong> <strong>River</strong>sockeye salm<strong>on</strong> associated with exposure to endocrine disrupti<strong>on</strong> chemicals andc<strong>on</strong>taminants <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> emerging c<strong>on</strong>cern. The results <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> this eco-epidemiological evaluati<strong>on</strong>indicate that it is unlikely that exposure to these c<strong>on</strong>taminants is the sole cause <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> theobserved patterns in sockeye salm<strong>on</strong> abundance, either over the past 20 years or in 2009.However, c<strong>on</strong>taminant exposures cannot be ruled out as a potential c<strong>on</strong>tributing factor forresp<strong>on</strong>ses <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>Fraser</strong> <strong>River</strong> sockeye salm<strong>on</strong> over the past two decades and/or for the lowreturns <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> sockeye salm<strong>on</strong> to the river in 2009.ES1.5 Uncertainty and Data Gap AnalysisThere are a number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> sources <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> uncertainty in assessments <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> risk to the sockeye salm<strong>on</strong>associated with exposure to c<strong>on</strong>taminants in the <strong>Fraser</strong> <strong>River</strong> Basin, includinguncertainties in the c<strong>on</strong>ceptual model, uncertainties in the effects assessment, andiii

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!