11.07.2015 Views

Potential Effects of Contaminants on Fraser River Sockeye Salmon

Potential Effects of Contaminants on Fraser River Sockeye Salmon

Potential Effects of Contaminants on Fraser River Sockeye Salmon

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

were used in the effects and exposure assessments (i.e., the maximum c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>measured for each habitat type in each Area <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Interest was selected as the exposure pointc<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong> for each chemical <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> potential c<strong>on</strong>cern; estimates <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> no-effect c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>sfor aquatic organisms were selected as the toxicity screening values). Chemicals for whichall measured c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s were below the corresp<strong>on</strong>ding no-effect c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s werec<strong>on</strong>sidered to be unlikely to cause adverse effects <strong>on</strong> sockeye salm<strong>on</strong> or other aquaticorganisms within the <strong>Fraser</strong> <strong>River</strong> Basin and were not c<strong>on</strong>sidered further in theinvestigati<strong>on</strong>. Chemicals for which <strong>on</strong>e or more measured c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s exceeded theselected toxicity screening value were identified as c<strong>on</strong>taminants <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>cern and subjectedto further evaluati<strong>on</strong> (see Chapter 5 for additi<strong>on</strong>al informati<strong>on</strong>). Chemicals for whichinsufficient informati<strong>on</strong> was available to complete the assessment were identified asuncertain c<strong>on</strong>taminants <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>cern and were evaluated using qualitative analyses (seeChapter 6 for more informati<strong>on</strong>). Each <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> these steps in the preliminary evaluati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>chemicals <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> potential c<strong>on</strong>cern is described in the following secti<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> this Chapter. Inadditi<strong>on</strong>, the results <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> these analyses are presented herein.4.2 Identificati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Potential</str<strong>on</strong>g>ly-Complete Exposure PathwaysBased <strong>on</strong> the results <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the evaluati<strong>on</strong> c<strong>on</strong>ducted in Chapter 3, it is apparent that land andwater use activities in the study area and in areas spatially removed from the watershedhave resulted or are likely to have resulted in the release <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 200 or more chemicalsubstances into aquatic habitats within the <strong>Fraser</strong> <strong>River</strong> Basin. Each <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> these c<strong>on</strong>taminantspartiti<strong>on</strong> into water, sediment, and/or biological tissues in accordance with their physicalchemicalproperties and the c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s within the receiving water system. Suchpartiti<strong>on</strong>ing and other envir<strong>on</strong>mental fate processes determine which media (i.e., water,sediment, and/or biota) become c<strong>on</strong>taminated and, thereby, represent potentially-completeexposure pathways to sockeye salm<strong>on</strong> in the study area. For an exposure pathway to becomplete, a c<strong>on</strong>taminant must be able to travel from the source to the ecological receptorunder c<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong> and must be taken up by that ecological receptor via <strong>on</strong>e or moreexposure routes.There are a number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> pathways through which <strong>Fraser</strong> <strong>River</strong> sockeye salm<strong>on</strong> can beexposed to the substances identified in the Aquatic <str<strong>on</strong>g>C<strong>on</strong>taminants</str<strong>on</strong>g> Inventory (Table 3.28).For the substances that partiti<strong>on</strong> into water, direct exposure to c<strong>on</strong>taminated waterrepresents the most important exposure pathway for sockeye salm<strong>on</strong> (i.e., uptake throughthe gills and/or through the skin). For substances that partiti<strong>on</strong> into sediments, directexposure to c<strong>on</strong>taminants in sediment and/or pore water during incubati<strong>on</strong> and46

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!