11.07.2015 Views

Potential Effects of Contaminants on Fraser River Sockeye Salmon

Potential Effects of Contaminants on Fraser River Sockeye Salmon

Potential Effects of Contaminants on Fraser River Sockeye Salmon

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4. Fish processing plants are fewer in number than in the past, hence sockeye andother salm<strong>on</strong>ids caught in various areas <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> BC are centrally processed at fewerplants, many <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> which are <strong>on</strong> the <strong>Fraser</strong> <strong>River</strong>. <strong>Sockeye</strong> salm<strong>on</strong> are known tocarry a wide range <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> native viral diseases, hence the possibility exists that fishprocessing plants are functi<strong>on</strong>ing as disease amplifiers due to the volume, andminimal level <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> treatment applied to their fish waste effluent.A screening survey <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> sockeye diseases in the ambient water above and belowfish processing plants, before, during and after sockeye and other peak salm<strong>on</strong>processing periods should be c<strong>on</strong>ducted to determine if this is a factor in thel<strong>on</strong>g term decline in <strong>Fraser</strong> <strong>River</strong> sockeye salm<strong>on</strong>.Resp<strong>on</strong>se: This is an excellent suggesti<strong>on</strong>. Accordingly, it was added to therecommendati<strong>on</strong>s listed in Chapter 8.6. Please provide any specific comments for the authors.Page 8, line 569 – change to “…each stock <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> sockeye…”Resp<strong>on</strong>se: Text revised as suggested.Page 14, line 736 – change to “…Cariboo Pulp…”Resp<strong>on</strong>se: Text revised as suggested.Page 19, following line 92, c<strong>on</strong>sider adding another bullet stating that fish diseasesshould be tested in the effluent from fish processing plants;Resp<strong>on</strong>se: Text revised as suggested.Page 30, line 1327 – add a space between “…theeffluents…”Resp<strong>on</strong>se: Text revised as suggested.Page 32, line 1415 – state the years when Adams Lake and Chilco Lake were fertilized,as neither lake is currently being fertilized and this gives the impressi<strong>on</strong> that these are<strong>on</strong>going fertilizati<strong>on</strong> programs;Resp<strong>on</strong>se: Text revised as suggested.Page 70, following line 2728, c<strong>on</strong>sider adding nanoparticles to the list <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> emergingc<strong>on</strong>taminants;Resp<strong>on</strong>se: Text revised as suggested.A-16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!