Potential Effects of Contaminants on Fraser River Sockeye Salmon

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 5.21. Summary <strong>of</strong> muscle tissue data collected from Weaver and Adams sockeye and Thompson chinook salmon populations 1 .Contaminant <strong>of</strong>ConcernnnDetect% Non-DetectMeanSDGeometricMeanMinMaxPercentile Distribution5th 10th 25th 50th 75th 90th 95thSamples Collected in the Spawning GroundsMetals (mg/g)Arsenic 13 6 53.8% 0.155 0.181 0.070 < 0.040 0.56 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.025 0.300 0.380 0.464Cadmium 13 3 76.9% 0.034 0.034 0.027 < 0.040 0.14 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.050 0.086Copper 13 13 0.0% 6.131 19.2 1.13 0.7 70 0.700 0.700 0.800 0.800 0.800 1.000 28.6Lead 13 13 0.0% 0.210 0.130 0.180 0.065 0.479 0.091 0.109 0.122 0.201 0.219 0.428 0.477Mercury 13 13 0.0% 0.034 0.016 0.031 0.019 0.067 0.020 0.020 0.022 0.026 0.041 0.058 0.063Selenium 13 1 92.3% 0.269 0.430 0.181 < 0.300 1.7 0.150 0.150 0.150 0.150 0.150 0.150 0.770Thallium 13 0 100.0% 0.002 0.000 0.002 < 0.004 < 0.005 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003Vanadium 13 10 23.1% 0.034 0.020 0.028 < 0.020 0.070 0.010 0.010 0.020 0.030 0.050 0.058 0.064Zinc 13 13 0.0% 9.41 9.76 7.68 5.50 41.8 5.63 5.85 6.39 6.80 7.02 8.10 21.68Pesticides (pg/g)Aldrin 23 0 100.0% 0.822 0.357 0.759 < 0.69 < 3.95 0.397 0.434 0.648 0.760 0.893 1.25 1.33a-HCH 22 10 54.5% 15.3 28.1 2.12 < 0.21 98.2 0.109 0.190 0.340 1.28 11.8 48.5 81.2b-HCH 23 7 69.6% 5.68 22.0 0.823 < 0.24 106.6 0.130 0.218 0.348 0.570 1.81 3.60 3.87Chlordane (total) 23 23 0.0% 866 404 769 148 1951 391 476 571 830 1077 1345 1406Dieldrin 23 23 0.0% 356 241 294 71.0 1088 104 144 196 310 415 567 878g-HCH 21 12 42.9% 6.74 11.1 1.85 < 0.46 40.7 0.275 0.280 0.595 0.930 7.33 21.3 26.3Heptachlor 23 5 78.3% 1.91 1.16 1.62 < 0.99 < 8.83 0.852 0.868 1.04 1.39 2.16 3.93 4.01Moethoxychlor 23 0 100.0% 5.31 3.95 4.50 < 5.17 < 36.7 2.66 2.80 3.50 3.67 4.71 8.76 14.018Mirex 23 23 0.0% 44.8 10.5 43.6 20.2 69.7 29.9 34.9 39.2 44.5 49.3 58.4 59.0Sum DDD 23 23 0.0% 955 436 842 113 2044 503 554 668 887 1287 1446 1629Sum DDE 23 23 0.0% 3995 1678 3708 2241 7410 2367 2572 2735 3373 4898 6914 7101Sum DDT 23 23 0.0% 983 477 870 298 2048 411 445 594 972 1230 1691 17001 Data obtained from Siska Traditions Society 2009.n = number, detect = detected, SD = standard deviation.T-242
Table 5.22. Summary <strong>of</strong> roe tissue data collected from Weaver and Adams sockeye and Thompson chinook salmon populations 1 .Contaminant <strong>of</strong>ConcernnnDetect% Non-DetectMeanSDGeometricMeanMinMaxPercentile Distribution5th 10th 25th 50th 75th 90th 95thSamples Collected at the Fraser River MouthMetals (mg/g)Arsenic 5 2 60.0% 0.11 0.164 0.053 < 0.040 0.4 0.021 0.022 0.025 0.025 0.08 0.272 0.336Cadmium 5 2 60.0% 0.036 0.022 0.031 < 0.040 0.060 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.060 0.060 0.060Copper 5 5 0.0% 41.14 38.1 23.2 5.3 96.8 5.32 5.34 5.4 47.5 50.7 78.36 87.58Lead 5 5 0.0% 0.192 0.065 0.183 0.127 0.290 0.130 0.133 0.141 0.187 0.214 0.260 0.275Mercury 5 5 0.0% 0.008 0.002 0.008 0.006 0.010 0.006 0.006 0.007 0.009 0.009 0.010 0.010Selenium 5 5 0.0% 1.68 0.554 1.61 1.10 2.60 1.18 1.26 1.50 1.60 1.60 2.20 2.40Thallium 5 0 100.0% 0.002 0.000 0.002 < 0.004 < 0.005 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003Vanadium 5 5 0.0% 0.502 0.534 0.248 0.05 1.14 0.054 0.058 0.07 0.23 1.02 1.092 1.116Zinc 5 5 0.0% 34.9 7.2 34.3 26.5 43.8 27.0 27.4 28.8 36.6 39.0 41.9 42.8Pesticides (pg/g)Aldrin 6 0 100.0% 1.49 1.19 1.24 < 1.3 < 7.77 0.706 0.763 0.923 1.13 1.27 2.59 3.24a-HCH 5 5 0.0% 965 100 961 848 1089 860 872 908 934 1048 1072 1081b-HCH 6 4 33.3% 480 379 87.5 < 2.22 855 1.2 1.3 151 644 720 793 824Chlordane (Total) 6 6 0.0% 1221 371 1175 873 1729 875 877 895 1166 1483 1621 1675Dieldrin 6 6 0.0% 967 109 963 888 1153 892 896 904 905 1014 1102 1127g-HCH 6 5 16.7% 229 127 106 < 2.07 383 54.4 107.9 220 242 280 337 360Heptachlor 6 1 83.3% 2.08 1.11 1.84 < 2.1 < 6.87 1.08 1.10 1.20 1.68 3.08 3.45 3.45Moethoxychlor 6 1 83.3% 25.4 13.6 21.9 < 15.82 < 85.05 9.49 11.1 16.3 24.2 35.8 40.8 41.7Mirex 6 6 0.0% 34.5 14.1 32.1 17.3 56.8 18.5 19.7 24.9 35.1 39.9 48.8 52.8Sum DDD 6 6 0.0% 1335 582 1246 895 2366 901 906 922 1094 1547 2005 2185Sum DDE 6 6 0.0% 5509 1900 5275 3740 8943 3900 4059 4469 4790 6019 7679 8311Sum DDT 6 6 0.0% 2220 2348 1213 373 6006 376 379 398 1268 3542 5014 5510T-243
Page 1:
February 2011technical report 2<str
Page 6 and 7:
thresholds), which represent lowest
Page 8 and 9:
Table of ContentsE
Page 10 and 11:
5.5 Summary of the
Page 12 and 13:
List of TablesTabl
Page 14 and 15:
Table 4.17Table 4.18Table 4.19Table
Page 16 and 17:
Table 4.47Table 4.48Table 4.49Table
Page 18 and 19:
Table 6.4Table 8.1Compounds for Nat
Page 20 and 21:
Figure 3.17 Map of
Page 23 and 24:
Figure 5.20 Late Stuart Sockeye Sal
Page 25 and 26:
List of Acronyms2,
Page 27 and 28:
AcknowledgementsThe authors would l
Page 29 and 30:
To assist it in fulfilling this man
Page 31 and 32:
• Development of
Page 33 and 34:
Chapter 2 Geographic and Temporal S
Page 35 and 36:
life history of th
Page 37 and 38:
• Pitt River Area of</str
Page 39 and 40:
Chapter 3 Inventory of</str
Page 41 and 42:
and Paper Mills - Canfor Pulp Limit
Page 43 and 44:
3.1.1.2 Sawmills, Plywood Mills and
Page 45 and 46:
(ENKON Environmental Ltd. 2001). Co
Page 47 and 48:
Effluent toxicity was also included
Page 49 and 50:
2011 for more information on the lo
Page 51 and 52:
facilities identified in Table 3.11
Page 53 and 54:
Inc.), poultry processing facilitie
Page 55 and 56:
• Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon
Page 57 and 58:
3.1.1.11 Municipal Wastewater Treat
Page 59 and 60:
• Personal care products (fragran
Page 61 and 62:
with oxytetracycline, ormetoprim, a
Page 63 and 64:
In summary, the contaminants that c
Page 65 and 66:
insecticides, such as phorate, terb
Page 67 and 68:
3.1.2.4 Runoff fro
Page 69 and 70:
the substances most amenable to lon
Page 71 and 72:
• Plastic-related compounds (i.e.
Page 73 and 74:
were used in the effects and exposu
Page 75 and 76:
warrants further assessment to dete
Page 77 and 78:
• Data collected for migration co
Page 79 and 80:
Hazard quotients were calculated fo
Page 81 and 82:
Many other substances have the pote
Page 83 and 84:
Chapter 5 Evaluation of</st
Page 85 and 86:
For surface water and sediment, the
Page 87 and 88:
3. For hardness-dependent water qua
Page 89 and 90:
• 2,3,7,8-TCDD toxic equivalents
Page 91 and 92:
concern by area of
Page 93 and 94:
0.05 mg/L; Glew and Hames 1971). As
Page 95 and 96:
least time rearing in freshwater ha
Page 97 and 98:
The results of thi
Page 99 and 100:
Interest and in the South Thompson
Page 101 and 102:
• Polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxi
Page 103 and 104:
glycoproteins, polypeptides, peptid
Page 105 and 106:
In-use herbicides in the Fraser Riv
Page 107 and 108:
and home wood heating; Johannessen
Page 109 and 110:
Pulp and paper mills, saw mills, an
Page 111 and 112:
salinity tolerance were significant
Page 113 and 114:
and gonadosomatic index scores were
Page 115 and 116:
the lowest observed effect concentr
Page 117 and 118:
Spitsbergen et al. (1991) reported
Page 119 and 120:
Chakravorty et al. (1992) observed
Page 121 and 122:
observed in saltwater gobies (Chasm
Page 123 and 124:
(See Chapters 4 and 5 for further i
Page 125 and 126:
emoval efficiency of</stron
Page 127 and 128:
point and non-point source discharg
Page 129 and 130:
Location of NatalS
Page 131 and 132:
Nevertheless, it is possible that e
Page 133 and 134:
concern relative to human or enviro
Page 135 and 136:
these substances to aquatic ecosyst
Page 137 and 138:
• Alkylphenol ethoxylates (APEOs;
Page 139 and 140:
chemicals of poten
Page 141 and 142:
productivity data, it is apparent t
Page 143 and 144:
• Sufficiency - For a cause and e
Page 145 and 146:
infection by various disease agents
Page 147 and 148:
magnitude, and spatial extent <stro
Page 149 and 150:
potential concern were documented a
Page 151 and 152:
pathways and the intensity and exte
Page 153 and 154:
Chilko River, Quesnel River, Nechak
Page 155 and 156:
• The majority of</strong
Page 157 and 158:
7.4.6 Information on Interactive <s
Page 159 and 160:
• Development of
Page 161 and 162:
8.4 Preliminary Evaluation
Page 163 and 164:
8.5 Evaluation of
Page 165 and 166:
the low returns of
Page 167 and 168:
8.9 RecommendationsThis evaluation
Page 169 and 170:
Chapter 9 References CitedAdams, R.
Page 171 and 172:
Braune, B., D. Muir, B. DeMarch, M.
Page 173 and 174:
EIP Associates. 1997. Polychlorinat
Page 175 and 176:
Gallaugher, P. and L. Wood (Eds). P
Page 177 and 178:
Hinch, S.G. and E.G. Martins. 2011.
Page 179 and 180:
Kemble, N.E., D.K. Hardesty, C.G. I
Page 181 and 182:
MacLatchy, D., L. Peters, J. Nickle
Page 183 and 184:
Milston, R.H., M.S. Fitzpatrick, A.
Page 185 and 186:
Peterman, R.M., D. Marmorek, B. Bec
Page 187 and 188:
Smith, D.B., R.A. Zielinski, H.E. T
Page 189 and 190:
USACE (U.S. Army Corps of</
Page 191 and 192:
Walker, M.K., J.M. Spitsbergen, J.R
Page 193 and 194:
Table 2.1. Overview of</str
Page 195 and 196:
Table 2.2. Sampling sites for Early
Page 197 and 198:
Table 2.3. Sampling sites for summe
Page 199 and 200:
Table 2.4. Sampling sites for river
Page 201 and 202:
Table 3.1. Listing of</stro
Page 203 and 204:
Table 3.2. Chemicals of</st
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Table 3.8. Major pipelines transpor
Page 221 and 222:
Table 3.10. Locations of</s
Page 223 and 224:
Table 3.11. Listing of</str
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241 and 242:
Table 3.16. List of</strong
Page 243 and 244:
Table 3.17. List of</strong
Page 245 and 246:
Table 3.18. Location of</st
Page 247 and 248:
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253 and 254:
Page 255 and 256:
Page 257 and 258:
Page 259 and 260:
Table 3.20. Summary of</str
Page 261 and 262:
Page 263 and 264:
Page 265 and 266:
Page 267 and 268:
Table 3.23. Estimated annual contam
Page 269 and 270:
Page 271 and 272:
Page 273 and 274:
Page 275 and 276:
Table 3.28. Inventory of</s
Page 277 and 278:
Page 279 and 280:
Page 281 and 282:
Page 283 and 284:
Table 4.1. Selected toxicity screen
Page 285 and 286:
Table 4.2. Selected toxicity screen
Page 287 and 288:
Table 4.3. Summary of</stro
Page 289 and 290:
Page 291 and 292:
Page 293 and 294:
Page 295 and 296:
Page 297 and 298:
Page 299 and 300:
Page 301 and 302:
Page 303 and 304:
Page 305 and 306:
Page 307 and 308:
Page 309 and 310:
Page 311 and 312:
Page 313 and 314:
Page 315 and 316:
Page 317 and 318:
Page 319 and 320:
Page 321 and 322:
Page 323 and 324:
Page 325 and 326:
Page 327 and 328:
Page 329 and 330:
Page 331 and 332:
Page 333 and 334:
Page 335 and 336:
Page 337 and 338:
Table 4.19. Evaluation of</
Page 339 and 340:
Page 341 and 342:
Page 343 and 344:
Page 345 and 346:
Page 347 and 348:
Page 349 and 350:
Page 351 and 352:
Page 353 and 354:
Page 355 and 356:
Page 357 and 358:
Page 359 and 360:
Page 361 and 362:
Table 4.32. Frequency of</s
Page 363 and 364:
Page 365 and 366:
Page 367 and 368:
Page 369 and 370:
Page 371 and 372:
Page 373 and 374:
Page 375 and 376:
Page 377 and 378:
Page 379 and 380:
Page 381 and 382:
Page 383 and 384: Table 4.45. Summary of</str
Page 397 and 398: Table 4.51. Evaluation of</
Page 399 and 400: Table 4.52. Frequency of</s
Page 401 and 402: Table 4.53. Identification
Page 403 and 404: Table 5.1. Selected toxicity refere
Page 405 and 406: Table 5.2. Selected toxicity refere
Page 407 and 408: Table 5.3. Exposure point concentra
Page 413 and 414: Table 5.9. Hazard quotients <strong
Page 415 and 416: Table 5.11. Hazard quotients <stron
Page 431 and 432: Table 5.19. Hazard quotients <stron
Page 433: Table 5.21. Summary of</str
Page 437 and 438: Table 5.23. Mean concentrations <st
Page 439 and 440: Table 6.2. Effects
Page 441 and 442: Table 6.3. Field studies of
Page 443 and 444: Table 6.4. Compounds for National r
Page 445 and 446: Table 8.1. Inventory of</st
Page 459 and 460: Figures
Page 461 and 462: F-2
Page 463 and 464: F-4
Page 465 and 466: F-6
Page 467 and 468: F-8
Page 469 and 470: F-10
Page 471 and 472: F-12
Page 473 and 474: F-14
Page 475 and 476: F-16
Page 477 and 478: F-18
Page 479 and 480: F-20
Page 481 and 482: F-22
Page 483 and 484: F-24
Page 485 and 486:
F-26
Page 487 and 488:
F-28
Page 489 and 490:
F-30
Page 491 and 492:
F-32
Page 493 and 494:
F-34
Page 495 and 496:
F-36
Page 497 and 498:
F-38
Page 499 and 500:
F-40
Page 501 and 502:
F-42
Page 503 and 504:
F-44
Page 505 and 506:
F-46
Page 507 and 508:
F-48
Page 509 and 510:
F-50
Page 511 and 512:
F-52
Page 513 and 514:
F-54
Page 515 and 516:
F-56
Page 517 and 518:
F-58
Page 519 and 520:
F-60
Page 521 and 522:
F-62
Page 523 and 524:
Figure 5.1. Water Quality Index sco
Page 525 and 526:
Figure 5.3. Fraser River Sockeye Sa
Page 527 and 528:
Figure 5.5. Pitt Sockeye Salmon Pro
Page 529 and 530:
Figure 5.7. Weaver Sockeye Salmon P
Page 531 and 532:
Figure 5.9. Cultus Sockeye Salmon P
Page 533 and 534:
Figure 5.11. Portage Sockeye Salmon
Page 535 and 536:
Figure 5.13. Fennell Sockeye Salmon
Page 537 and 538:
Figure 5.15. Late Shuswap Sockeye S
Page 539 and 540:
Figure 5.17. Chilko Sockeye Salmon
Page 541 and 542:
Figure 5.19. Early Stuart Sockeye S
Page 543 and 544:
Figure 5.21. Stellako Sockeye Salmo
Page 545 and 546:
Figure 5.23. Bowron Sockeye Salmon
Page 547 and 548:
Appendices
Page 549 and 550:
SW4 Deliverables4.1 The Contractor
Page 551 and 552:
obtained on one species, sometimes
Page 553 and 554:
• For substances for which the se
Page 555 and 556:
WeaknessesThere is a lot of
Page 557 and 558:
Pg 110 Ln 4189 - now called Listene
Page 559 and 560:
the potential effects of</s
Page 561 and 562:
A-14
Page 563 and 564:
4. Fish processing plants are fewer
Page 565 and 566:
Appendix 3. Environmental Data Sour
Page 567 and 568:
4. Keyword searches for water quali
Page 569 and 570:
A3.5 Contaminant Spill ReportsData
Page 571 and 572:
River Pulp, Kamloops Cellulose Fibr
Page 573 and 574:
Table A3.1. Water quality stations
Page 575 and 576:
Table A3.1. Water quality stations
Page 577 and 578:
Appendix 4. Data Treatment and Meth
Page 579 and 580:
when multiple samples were reported
Page 581 and 582:
$ Early rearing of
Page 583 and 584:
i) The number of t
Page 585 and 586:
In addition, some sockeye salmon (e
Page 587 and 588:
• Selecting probable effect conce
Page 589 and 590:
deBruyn, A.M., H. deBruyn, M.G. Iko
Page 591 and 592:
Appendix 5. Data description and so
Page 593 and 594:
Page 595 and 596:
Page 597 and 598:
Page 599 and 600:
Page 601 and 602:
Page 603:
show all

Potential Effects of Contaminants on Fraser River Sockeye Salmon

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?