11.07.2015 Views

Potential Effects of Contaminants on Fraser River Sockeye Salmon

Potential Effects of Contaminants on Fraser River Sockeye Salmon

Potential Effects of Contaminants on Fraser River Sockeye Salmon

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 5.21. Summary <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> muscle tissue data collected from Weaver and Adams sockeye and Thomps<strong>on</strong> chinook salm<strong>on</strong> populati<strong>on</strong>s 1 .C<strong>on</strong>taminant <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>C<strong>on</strong>cernnnDetect% N<strong>on</strong>-DetectMeanSDGeometricMeanMinMaxPercentile Distributi<strong>on</strong>5th 10th 25th 50th 75th 90th 95thSamples Collected in the Spawning GroundsMetals (mg/g)Arsenic 13 6 53.8% 0.155 0.181 0.070 < 0.040 0.56 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.025 0.300 0.380 0.464Cadmium 13 3 76.9% 0.034 0.034 0.027 < 0.040 0.14 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.050 0.086Copper 13 13 0.0% 6.131 19.2 1.13 0.7 70 0.700 0.700 0.800 0.800 0.800 1.000 28.6Lead 13 13 0.0% 0.210 0.130 0.180 0.065 0.479 0.091 0.109 0.122 0.201 0.219 0.428 0.477Mercury 13 13 0.0% 0.034 0.016 0.031 0.019 0.067 0.020 0.020 0.022 0.026 0.041 0.058 0.063Selenium 13 1 92.3% 0.269 0.430 0.181 < 0.300 1.7 0.150 0.150 0.150 0.150 0.150 0.150 0.770Thallium 13 0 100.0% 0.002 0.000 0.002 < 0.004 < 0.005 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003Vanadium 13 10 23.1% 0.034 0.020 0.028 < 0.020 0.070 0.010 0.010 0.020 0.030 0.050 0.058 0.064Zinc 13 13 0.0% 9.41 9.76 7.68 5.50 41.8 5.63 5.85 6.39 6.80 7.02 8.10 21.68Pesticides (pg/g)Aldrin 23 0 100.0% 0.822 0.357 0.759 < 0.69 < 3.95 0.397 0.434 0.648 0.760 0.893 1.25 1.33a-HCH 22 10 54.5% 15.3 28.1 2.12 < 0.21 98.2 0.109 0.190 0.340 1.28 11.8 48.5 81.2b-HCH 23 7 69.6% 5.68 22.0 0.823 < 0.24 106.6 0.130 0.218 0.348 0.570 1.81 3.60 3.87Chlordane (total) 23 23 0.0% 866 404 769 148 1951 391 476 571 830 1077 1345 1406Dieldrin 23 23 0.0% 356 241 294 71.0 1088 104 144 196 310 415 567 878g-HCH 21 12 42.9% 6.74 11.1 1.85 < 0.46 40.7 0.275 0.280 0.595 0.930 7.33 21.3 26.3Heptachlor 23 5 78.3% 1.91 1.16 1.62 < 0.99 < 8.83 0.852 0.868 1.04 1.39 2.16 3.93 4.01Moethoxychlor 23 0 100.0% 5.31 3.95 4.50 < 5.17 < 36.7 2.66 2.80 3.50 3.67 4.71 8.76 14.018Mirex 23 23 0.0% 44.8 10.5 43.6 20.2 69.7 29.9 34.9 39.2 44.5 49.3 58.4 59.0Sum DDD 23 23 0.0% 955 436 842 113 2044 503 554 668 887 1287 1446 1629Sum DDE 23 23 0.0% 3995 1678 3708 2241 7410 2367 2572 2735 3373 4898 6914 7101Sum DDT 23 23 0.0% 983 477 870 298 2048 411 445 594 972 1230 1691 17001 Data obtained from Siska Traditi<strong>on</strong>s Society 2009.n = number, detect = detected, SD = standard deviati<strong>on</strong>.T-242

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!