11.07.2015 Views

Potential Effects of Contaminants on Fraser River Sockeye Salmon

Potential Effects of Contaminants on Fraser River Sockeye Salmon

Potential Effects of Contaminants on Fraser River Sockeye Salmon

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

quality index scores were also calculated for each habitat sockeye salm<strong>on</strong> stockcombinati<strong>on</strong>. Such water quality index scores were plotted over time for the entirewatershed to determine if temporal trends in water quality c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s were evident. Theresults <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> this evaluati<strong>on</strong> showed that water quality c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s in spawning and incubati<strong>on</strong>habitats did not exhibit any significant trend (Figure 5.1). However, the ranges <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> thewater quality index scores for the pre-1990 and post-1990 (and particularly post-1992)periods suggest that water quality c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s may have become less variable and poorerover the last 15 - 20 years. No such trends are evident for the rearing areas over theperiod <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> record (i.e., 1970 to 2009). For the migrati<strong>on</strong> corridors, water qualityc<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s generally showed a downward trend for the period 1965 to 1990, are c<strong>on</strong>sistentbetween 1990 and 2003, and show improvement thereafter (Figure 5.1). However, theselatter results (i.e., for the post-2003 period) should be interpreted cautiously because suchchanges in water quality c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s coincided with the time that municipalities assumedresp<strong>on</strong>sibility for ambient envir<strong>on</strong>mental quality m<strong>on</strong>itoring. The results <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> suchm<strong>on</strong>itoring activities are typically not included in the EMS database that was accessed tocompile the data used to support this evaluati<strong>on</strong>. Hence, it is uncertain if the observedimprovements in water quality c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s after 2003 reflect actual c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s in themigrati<strong>on</strong> routes <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> sockeye salm<strong>on</strong>.5.4 Evaluati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the <str<strong>on</strong>g>Potential</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Effects</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>C<strong>on</strong>taminants</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> C<strong>on</strong>cern <strong>on</strong> <strong>Sockeye</strong>Salm<strong>on</strong>Adverse effects <strong>on</strong> sockeye salm<strong>on</strong> utilizing habitats in the <strong>Fraser</strong> <strong>River</strong> Basin associatedwith exposure to c<strong>on</strong>taminants <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>cern were evaluated by integrating exposure andeffects data and informati<strong>on</strong>. More specifically, hazard quotients were calculated for eachc<strong>on</strong>taminant <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>cern in surface water for each <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the following habitats in each area <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>interest:• Spawning and incubati<strong>on</strong> habitats;• Rearing habitats;• Smolt outmigrati<strong>on</strong> habitats, and,• Adult upstream-migrati<strong>on</strong> habitats.In this evaluati<strong>on</strong>, hazard quotients (HQs) were calculated by dividing the exposure pointc<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong> (EPC) by the selected toxicity threshold (TT) (i.e., HQ = EPC ÷ TT). Forsediments and fish tissues, hazard quotients were calculated for each c<strong>on</strong>taminant <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>63

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!