SCT Banner Student / Release Guide / 7.0

Section 13 Problem ResolutionsRegistration ModuleSFKFEE1 (#89820)Tuition and fees are now being reversed when a student drops a course from theWeb using the DW drop code. Resolved in Release 6.1.SFKFEE1 (#89241)Dropping a student in an active refund period when using flat rule processing(plateaus) did not calculate the correct refund when the SFARGFE rules in use wereset by course level. (The Rule Type field was set to LEVEL.) This also occurred forthe course campus and course attribute rules. (The Rule Type field was set to eitherCAMPUS or ATTR.)Fee assessment processing has been corrected so that when "plateau" charging isused and refunding rules are set for level, campus, and/or attribute processing, theresults are now consistent with when the rules are set for student processing. (TheRule Type field is set to STUDENT.) Resolved in Release 6.1.SFKFEE1 (#89995)SFRFASC was calculating the fees correctly, but when a registration was backdated,the current date was being used in the accounting. When a registration wasbackdated, SFAREGS used the current date, instead of picking up the backdate.This affected backdated refunds, especially if backdating was done in a refund bytotal period. This has been corrected. Resolved in Release 6.1.SFKFEE1 (#89300)When a section fee was assigned to a student, the Note field in the Detail AuditInformation window contained a dollar ($) sign for currency in the text. As this wasnot appropriate for international users, the $ has been removed from the Notesfield. The $ sign will no longer display for any new transactions created after thiscorrection is installed. Removal of previously posted $ signs will require an SQLupdate. Resolved in Release 6.1.SFKFEE1 (#88805)Incorrect assessments (refunds) were calculated when a course had a section fee(SSADETL), the refund rules were defined on SFAESTS, and Track by CRN waschecked on SOATERM. Incorrect results also occurred when there was a 100%refund period defined in SFAESTS under these conditions. These issues have beencorrected. Resolved in Release 6.1.SFKFEE1 (#87305)If a charge rule was established on SSADETL using a detail code other than TUI orFEE, that charge was not being applied to the student's account or the audit historyrecord for the student. This has been corrected. This problem resolution alsocorrects #87337. Resolved in Release 6.1.SFKFEE1 (#88708)When a refund was calculated from an SFAESTS refund period, the assessmentprocess was not inserting a total non-dropped hours record in SFRFAUD (placeholder 0.00 amount record viewed in SFAFAUD). This can lead to a mis-Student Release 7.0 January 2005356 Release Guide Confidential