13.07.2015 Views

the ethnological notebooks of karl marx - Marxists Internet Archive

the ethnological notebooks of karl marx - Marxists Internet Archive

the ethnological notebooks of karl marx - Marxists Internet Archive

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

INTRODUCTIONThe <strong>ethnological</strong> writings <strong>of</strong> Lewis Henry Morgan, John Budd Phear,Henry Sumner Maine, and John Lubbock (Lord Avebury) were excerptedand critically reviewed by Karl Marx in <strong>the</strong> period 1880-1881-1882.A sense <strong>of</strong> unity may be derived from <strong>the</strong> juxtaposition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> names<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se writers on ethnology, as though <strong>the</strong>y represented a commontradition; such a judgment would be contrary to fact, although <strong>the</strong>ywere all uncritical evolutionists in England and America, active in<strong>the</strong> 1870s. Marx studied a number <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r works in ethnology and culturehistory in addition to <strong>the</strong>se, in particular those <strong>of</strong> Georg L. Maurerand Maxim M. Kovalevsky. Morgan put toge<strong>the</strong>r an account <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>evolution <strong>of</strong> human society than which none was more coherent in itstime; Maine was <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> leading English figure in comparative andhistorical jurisprudence; Phear and Kovalevsky were both attracted tohis doctrines, Phear on <strong>the</strong> Oriental side; Lubbock was one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bestknownDarwinians <strong>of</strong> that period.Marx left his notes in <strong>the</strong> state in which <strong>the</strong>y are published here, hiswork cut short by his death in 1883. Friedrich Engels took up Marx’snotes on Morgan in connection with his own book, D er Ursprung derFamilie, des Privateigentums und des Staats. This portion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> materialswas <strong>the</strong>n discussed by Karl Kautsky, Eduard Bernstein, and HeinrichCunow, as those associated with <strong>the</strong> German Social Democracy at <strong>the</strong>end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> nineteenth century and beginning <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> twentieth, particularlyin its organ, D ie Neue Z eit.The body <strong>of</strong> Marx’s excerpt <strong>notebooks</strong> containing his studies inethnology <strong>of</strong> this time was not surveyed until <strong>the</strong> following generation.D. Ryazanov, <strong>the</strong> editor <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> historical-critical edition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> collectedworks <strong>of</strong> Marx and Engels, gave a brief account <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m, with <strong>the</strong> exception<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Phear materials, in a lecture before <strong>the</strong> Socialist Academy inMoscow, November 20, 1923, and published in <strong>the</strong> Vestnik SotsialisticheskoyAkadem ii, in <strong>the</strong> same year; it was <strong>the</strong>n brought out, under <strong>the</strong>editorship <strong>of</strong> Carl Griinberg, in <strong>the</strong> Archiv fu r die Geschichte des So^ialismusin 1925. A Russian version <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Morgan manuscript alone, with significantchanges, was published in <strong>the</strong> A rkhiv <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Marx-Engels Institute1941, on <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> photocopies <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> original made by Ryazanov.These excerpt <strong>notebooks</strong> were again surveyed, by E. Lucas in 1964, nowincluding <strong>the</strong> Phear manuscript; <strong>the</strong> Morgan manuscript materials <strong>of</strong>1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!