13.07.2015 Views

the ethnological notebooks of karl marx - Marxists Internet Archive

the ethnological notebooks of karl marx - Marxists Internet Archive

the ethnological notebooks of karl marx - Marxists Internet Archive

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ADDENDAi. Chronology <strong>of</strong> materials in IISG Notebook B 146, containing excerptsand notes from Morgan, Phear and Maine; and Notebook B 150 containingexcerpts and notes from Lubbock. (See below, note 15 for survey<strong>of</strong> <strong>notebooks</strong>.)The materials were worked on in <strong>the</strong> order indicated. There is nodirect evidence in <strong>the</strong> <strong>notebooks</strong> <strong>the</strong>mselves or from correspondence,etc., when <strong>the</strong> work was begun. There is a direct indication relative to<strong>the</strong> dating <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> close <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> materials from Notebook B 146 which aredealt with in <strong>the</strong> present essay; <strong>the</strong> indication, while it is direct, is notentirely free <strong>of</strong> problems, and hence is not firm. Marx commented on anIrish Coercion Bill in Parliament in his notes on Maine, p. 192, i.e. fivepages from <strong>the</strong> end, interpolating in that connection, “Dies geschriebenJuni 1888.” It had been announced in January 1880 that a CoercionStatute <strong>the</strong>n in force would be allowed to lapse on June 1, 1880. A newCoercion Bill was introduced by W. E. Forster, <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> party <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> viceroy<strong>of</strong> Ireland, in <strong>the</strong> British Parliament on January 24, 1881 and enacted onMarch 2, 1881, after strenuous parliamentary debate and public protest.“It practically enabled <strong>the</strong> viceroy to lock up anybody he pleased, and todetain him as long as he pleased, while <strong>the</strong> Act remained in force.” 158The Notebook B 146 was filled seriatim, although number 144 wasskipped in <strong>the</strong> pagination (but not <strong>the</strong> page - see <strong>the</strong> place and note 15).It has generally been held that this portion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Notebook, with <strong>the</strong>exception <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> notes from Hospitalier, was filled within a fairly short,consecutive period <strong>of</strong> time. It now must be considered that <strong>the</strong> timeperiod in which <strong>the</strong> materials from Morgan, Phear and Maine (as well asMoney and Sohm) as a whole were worked on was somewhat longer thanthat which has been accepted hi<strong>the</strong>rto. Following <strong>the</strong> notes taken fromMaine he included in Notebook B 146 in or about November 1882those from Hospitalier’s work on electricity, which had been publishedin 1881.159As to when <strong>the</strong> sequence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> materials in this Notebook was begun,<strong>the</strong>re is no direct evidence but only external and indirect indications thatMarx worked on <strong>the</strong> first <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> series, Morgan’s Ancient Society, during<strong>the</strong> winter, and perhaps spring <strong>of</strong> 1880-1881. Vera Zasulich had writtento Marx concerning agrarian problems and <strong>the</strong> village commune inRussia160 in a letter dated February 16, 1881. Marx’s reply is dated86

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!