13.07.2015 Views

the ethnological notebooks of karl marx - Marxists Internet Archive

the ethnological notebooks of karl marx - Marxists Internet Archive

the ethnological notebooks of karl marx - Marxists Internet Archive

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

wüchsige Theilung der Arbeit aus den Geschlechts- und Altersverschiedenheiten__” (“ Within a family, and after fur<strong>the</strong>r developmentwithin a tribe, <strong>the</strong>re springs up a natural division <strong>of</strong> labour, out <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>differences <strong>of</strong> age and sex__ ” ) Engels added <strong>the</strong> footnote to this, “ Späteresehr gründliche Studien der menschlichen Urzustände führten den Verfasser[des Kapital] zum Ergebniss, dass ursprünglich nicht die Familiesich zum Stamm ausbildet, sondern umgekehrt, der Stamm die ursprünglichenaturwüchsige Form der auf Blutsverwandtschaft beruhendenmenschlichen Vergesellschaftung war, sodass aus der beginnendenAuflösung der Stammesbande erst später die vielfach verschiednenFormen der Familie sich entwickelten.” (“ Subsequent very searchingstudies <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> primitive condition <strong>of</strong> man led <strong>the</strong> author [<strong>of</strong> Capital] to <strong>the</strong>conclusion, that it was not <strong>the</strong> family that originally developed into <strong>the</strong>tribe, but that, on <strong>the</strong> contrary, <strong>the</strong> tribe was <strong>the</strong> primitive and spontaneouslydeveloped form <strong>of</strong> human association, on <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> blood relationship,and that out <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> first incipient loosening <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> tribal bonds,<strong>the</strong> many and various forms <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> family were afterwards developed.”)142The later studies by Marx which Engels referred to were those whichrelated to Morgan. Engels formulated <strong>the</strong> problem <strong>of</strong> his book on <strong>the</strong>Origin <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Family at <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> 1883, foreshadowed both by <strong>the</strong> footnotein Capital <strong>of</strong> November 1883, and his vain search for a copy <strong>of</strong> AncientSociety at <strong>the</strong> beginning <strong>of</strong> January 1884.143 He prepared a synopsis <strong>of</strong>his own work, which at first bore <strong>the</strong> title Entstehung (Development orFormation) der Familie, etc., on <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> Marx’s notes, read both from<strong>the</strong>se and from his synopsis to Bernstein who visited him at <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong>February-beginning <strong>of</strong> March 1884. Engels acquired his own copy <strong>of</strong>Morgan’s work later in March,144 and finished <strong>the</strong> first eight chapters <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> Origin <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Family two months later, reserving <strong>the</strong> last chapter forrevisions145 (which were never carried through: <strong>the</strong>se are in connectionwith <strong>the</strong> critique <strong>of</strong> civilization by Fourier).146 He considered that Marxhimself wanted to introduce <strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong> Morgan to <strong>the</strong> Germans, andpublished <strong>the</strong> book in ‘execution <strong>of</strong> a bequest’, thus interpreting <strong>the</strong>design <strong>of</strong> Marx’s <strong>notebooks</strong>.147As <strong>the</strong> opening phrase <strong>of</strong> his Origin <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Family, Engels stated,“Morgan is <strong>the</strong> first who, with factual knowledge, sought to bring adefinite order to <strong>the</strong> early history <strong>of</strong> mankind; so long as no significantlyexpanded material calls for changes, his classification will remain inforce.” 148Engels established his own relation to <strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong> Morgan on <strong>the</strong> oneside and to that <strong>of</strong> Marx on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r. The following two tables will list<strong>the</strong> more important points <strong>of</strong> contact between Engels’ work with that <strong>of</strong>Morgan, on <strong>the</strong> one hand, and with that <strong>of</strong> Marx, in this reference, on<strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r.77

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!