13.07.2015 Views

the ethnological notebooks of karl marx - Marxists Internet Archive

the ethnological notebooks of karl marx - Marxists Internet Archive

the ethnological notebooks of karl marx - Marxists Internet Archive

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>the</strong> Signory, for that commonly he is a man <strong>of</strong> stronger year(s) andbetter experience to maintain <strong>the</strong> inheritance and to defend <strong>the</strong> country...And to this end <strong>the</strong> Tanaist is always ready known, if it should happen to<strong>the</strong> Captain suddenly to die, or to be slain in battle, or to be out o f <strong>the</strong>country, to defend and keep it from all such dangers.” (Spenser: “ View <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> State <strong>of</strong> Ireland” , bei Maine, p. 201, 202) [Maine, der gar nicht erwähnt(cp. oben Haverty) was d. Irisch writers gesagt, giebt als seine Entdekkung:]“ Primogeniture, considered as a rule <strong>of</strong> succession to property,appears to me a product <strong>of</strong> tribal leadership in its decay. (20(2)) Glanville(unter Henry II, whslich n 8 6 ) hZ writes mit Bezug auf English militarytenures: “ When anyone dies, leaving a younger son and a grandson, <strong>the</strong>child <strong>of</strong> his eldest son, a great doubt exists as to which <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> two <strong>the</strong> lawprefers in <strong>the</strong> succession to <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r, whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> son or <strong>the</strong> grandson.Some think <strong>the</strong> younger son has more right to <strong>the</strong> inheritance than <strong>the</strong>grandson but o<strong>the</strong>rs incline to think that <strong>the</strong> grandson might523 bepreferred to his uncle.” (Glanville, V II. 7) Ebenso disputes amongHighland families about <strong>the</strong> tide to <strong>the</strong> chieftaincy o f particular clans.(I.e. 203) Maine versteht d. ganzen case nicht; meint d. Onkel z.B. gewählt,weil mehr wehrhaft; daggen sobald times had become friedlicherunter central authority <strong>of</strong> a king “ <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> strategical capacity in <strong>the</strong>humbler chiefs would diminish, and in <strong>the</strong> smaller bro<strong>the</strong>rhoods <strong>the</strong> respectfor purity <strong>of</strong> blood would have unchecked play” . (203) [Dies reiner Blödsinn.D. Sach’ ist allmälig Ueberwigen (zusammenhängend mit Entwicklg v.Privatgdeigenthum) der Ein^elfamilie über d. Gens. Des Vaters Brudernäher dem ihnen beiden gemeinscftlichen Stammhaupt, als irgendeinerder Söhne des Vaters; also der Onkel der Söhne näher als einer vondiesen selbst. Nachdem schon mit Bezug auf d. Familie d. Kinder d.Vaters <strong>the</strong>ilen, u. d. gens nur noch wenig od. gar nicht an d. Erbscftbe<strong>the</strong>iligt, kann für öffentliche FunktionenS2b, also gens chief, tribe chief,etc noch d. alte gens rule vorwiegend bleiben; nothwendig entsteht aber strugglezwischen beiden.] Dieselbe Streitfrage arose zwischen d. descendants<strong>of</strong> daughters in d. controversy zwischen Bruce u. Baliol über Krone vonSchottland. (204) (Edward I liess für Baliol entscheiden, danach d. descendants<strong>of</strong> an elder child must be exhausted before those <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> youngerhad a title.) Sobald d. älteste Sohn statt d. Onkel folgte to “ <strong>the</strong> humblerchieftaincies” he doubtless also obtained that “ portion <strong>of</strong> land attachedto <strong>the</strong> Signory which went without partition to <strong>the</strong> Tanaist.” 53 (204)So “ <strong>the</strong> demesne” , as it was afterwards called, assumed more and more <strong>the</strong>character <strong>of</strong> mere property descending according to <strong>the</strong> rule <strong>of</strong> primo-179 geniture” . (p. 204) | Nach u. nach dann this principle o f primogenitureextended from <strong>the</strong> demesne to all <strong>the</strong> estates o f <strong>the</strong> holder <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Signory,however acquired, and ultimately determined <strong>the</strong> law <strong>of</strong> succession for<strong>the</strong> privileged classes throughout feudalised Europe. (204, 5) French“ Parage” under which <strong>the</strong> near kinsmen o f <strong>the</strong> eldest son still took an311

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!