RESPONSIBLE ENTREPRENEURSHIP VISION DEVELOPMENT AND ETHICS

142 RESPONSIBLE ENTREPRENEURSHIP
Table 1: Research factors
Factors Definition Items References
1. Promotion and
growth
opportunities
Promotion represents opportunityto have
career growth that increase level of
responsibility and social position.
2. Work itself Work itself means the perception of employees
about their work.
3. Teamwork The group of people that collaborate in order to
achieve a specific goal.
4. Communication Information sharing between employees within
a company.
5. Mentoring and
supervision
6. Sense of
achievement
Training system where more experienced
person (mentor) provide support to trainee.
Sense of accomplishment that employees have
about their work.
7. Training Teaching process that develop employees
skills and knowledge.
8. Empowerment A practice where employees are involved in
managing process.
9. Creativity Ability to perceive things in a new way,
generating innovative solutions.
10. Feedback The tool that provides an analysis of
employees effort and also an image of how
well the purpose and strategy of the company
is performed.
11. Job Security Employees assurance that they will keep their
job.
3 Rich, B. L., Lepine, J. A.,
& Crawford, E. R. (2010)
3 Rich, Lepine and
Crawford (2010)
3 Mitrache and Ciorbagiu-
Naon (2009)
3 Rich, Lepine and
Crawford (2010)
3 Rich, Lepine and
Crawford (2010)
4 Mitrache and Ciorbagiu-
Naon (2009)
3 Dysvik and Kuvaas
(2008)
3 Zhang and Bartol (2010)
3 Zhang and Bartol (2010)
3 Guo et al., (2014)
3 Noble (2008)
12. Leadership The process of leading a group of employees. 3 Camilleri and Van Der
Heijden (2007)
13. Job
engagement
14. Organizational
loyalty
Emotional connection between employees and
organization.
Employee align with company’s vision and
mission.
15. Recognition The process through which supervisor
encourage and recognize employees for their
work.
16. Extrinsic
motivation
17. Intrinsic
motivation
18. Employees
performance
Motivation that appear as result of external
rewards
Motivation that comes as result of internal
desire to perform a task
3 Rich, Lepine and
Crawford (2010)
3 Camilleri and Van Der
Heijden (2007)
3 Danish and Usman
(2010)
3 Rich, Lepine and
Crawford (2010)
Mitrache and
Ciorbagiu-Naon (2009)
3 Cho and Perry (2012)
Dysvik (2013)
Zhang and Bartol (2010)
The level of how well employees perform tasks 3 Dysvik (2013)
The data analysis of the study were done using more reliable SPSS tools, such as descriptive,
correlation and multiple linear analysis. Further, was developed the construct validity
table where was included means and standard deviation for each item and motivational fac-