17.08.2016 Views

RESPONSIBLE ENTREPRENEURSHIP VISION DEVELOPMENT AND ETHICS

2aO8o2F

2aO8o2F

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Social enterprise as the initiator and coordinator of community health awareness campaign 249<br />

Proposition 2: Educational institutions can contribute significantly in CSC performance.<br />

Important outputs of cross sector collaboration are educations and trainings where CSC<br />

can train the trainers in different areas of CSC activities. Educational institutions role in CSC<br />

can be significant. They can provide learning/training within CSC and wider outside of CSC.<br />

Surveys of junior high and high school students identified large deficiencies in their knowledge<br />

about normal hearing as well as about hearing loss, and they knew little about the damaging<br />

effects of noise exposure (Martin et al. 2006). Firms that are able to infuse their<br />

decision-making with learning from proactive cross-sector alliances (for ex. from educational<br />

institutions) can be expected to better understand social issues and sustain integration of this<br />

newly acquired vision of responsible practice into overall corporate strategy (Arya et al. 2015).<br />

It was shown by researchers and scholars that university collaborations with industry, government<br />

and community (i.e. cross-sector or multiactor) could significantly contribute to a<br />

local or regional transition to sustainability (Trencher, Yarime, & Kharrazi 2013). Corporations<br />

adopt schools and work with colleges and universities to train the skilled end entry level<br />

workers they needed (Waddock 1988). Firms often enter alliances with the expectation of<br />

learning new knowledge and acquiring external rent generating resources (Lavie 2006). At<br />

the university level, cross sector sustainability alliances may be initiated and driven by a combination<br />

of any of the following: faculty/researchers, administration, students and ‘bridging<br />

organizations’ (Trencher, Yarime, & Kharrazi 2013). There are two major motives that forces<br />

educational institutions to cooperate in CSC: funding and scientific research. In order to remain<br />

competitive, universities are constantly faced with the need to obtain funding while individuals<br />

or universities initiate or become involved in collaborations aimed at generating solutions<br />

to urban sustainability issues for scientific or scholarly reasons (Trencher et al. 2013).<br />

I believe that with the participation at CSC, each partner will try to achieve its own objectives<br />

via the partnership, furthermore partners and their employees will learn from CSC.<br />

Proposition 3: Cross sector collaboration will be more feasible if different degrees of collaboration<br />

will apply for different purposes.<br />

Nocon (1994) sees a continuum of collaboration as encompassing three broad options. First,<br />

networks, involving either a structured or loose system of contact, but with no specific expectations<br />

or commitments to joint working. Second, Nocon defines coalition of federative working.<br />

This might initially involve only the sharing of information, but could develop into matching<br />

separate service plans, producing a joint strategic plan. Third, the unitary model, which a total<br />

pooling of resources to serve a single set of objectives – though this must be limited to partial<br />

pooling, otherwise the best description would be merger. Successful cross-sector alliances<br />

entail creation of new intra and inter-organizational knowledge structures to facilitate information<br />

flow among partner organizations(Arya et al. 2006). I believe that SE can contribute<br />

to CSC feasibility. Upon the feasibility analysis, social enterprise can continue CSC activities<br />

with licensing a product/service, create joint venture, run a start-up, create a franchise or lastly<br />

continue with CSC. It was shown by several scholars (Rydzynski & Jung 2008, Gilles and<br />

Paul 2014) that feasibility of NIHL risks campaign can be substantially improved by raising<br />

public awareness about hearing and how hearing can be damaged by excessive sound exposure.<br />

Target group must become aware of the consequences and permanent nature of hearing<br />

loss, and how and why NIHL can and should be prevented. It is important to inform teachers<br />

and school administrators about existing hearing conservation programs, curricula, and materials<br />

that can be used in classrooms. Educational interventions can increase knowledge about

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!