17.08.2016 Views

RESPONSIBLE ENTREPRENEURSHIP VISION DEVELOPMENT AND ETHICS

2aO8o2F

2aO8o2F

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

In search of balance. Managing ambidexterity in a fast growing techno-SME 353<br />

Knowledge flows were linked by Mom et al. (2007) to explorative and exploitative activities.<br />

The scales they developed were used in the questionnaire. To measure top-down and<br />

horizontal knowledge flows, a 3-item construct was used, while a 2-item construct was used<br />

for the bottom-up knowledge flows.<br />

MT characteristics were measured by (Li, 2012) through TMT diversity, shared, vision,<br />

connectedness, and trust. Since Li did not include the questions on how TMT diversity was<br />

measured in the respective article, these questions could not be used. Shared vision is measured<br />

on a 5-item scale, while connectedness and trust are both measured on a 4-item scale.<br />

Market characteristics are measured by Li (2012) through a 4-item scale on environmental<br />

competitiveness, and a 5-item scale on environmental dynamism. The market characteristics<br />

can be an indication for a firm’s incentive to innovate.<br />

The constructs involving strategy and ambidexterity were included in all questionnaires,<br />

while MT characteristics and environment characteristics were only included in the MT questionnaire,<br />

and managerial exploration and exploitation activities, and knowledge flows were<br />

only included in the MT and managers questionnaire (since MT members are also unit managers).<br />

The performance management and social support constructs were only included in<br />

the employee questionnaire.<br />

Data analysis<br />

Questionnaire<br />

The outcomes of the questionnaires were analyzed in SPSS, negative questions were recoded<br />

and total scores were computed, after which Cronbach’s alpha was checked on acceptability<br />

of the results, minimal, maximal, mean and standard deviation values were computed<br />

to obtain a better sense of the results and identify major differences. Next, scatter plots were<br />

drawn to further interpret the results and extract the information characterizing Ampelmann<br />

to be used during the interviews.<br />

Interviews<br />

Interviews were taped and the recorded audio files were uploaded in transcription software<br />

for easier (but manual) transcription. Next, the transcribed texts were uploaded in Atlas<br />

TI for interview coding, for which the following coding categories were identified:<br />

– Strength (of innovation processes)<br />

– Weakness (of innovation processes)<br />

– Conflicting Demand<br />

– Need<br />

– Decision Moment<br />

– Decision Maker<br />

During the coding process, subcategories were added to represent the meaning of what<br />

was being said by the interviewee. Also, top level categories (innovation and explorationexploitation)<br />

were added, to separate the strengths between the two categories. The weaknesses<br />

were coded only in relation to the innovation process, while the conflicting demands<br />

were coded only in relation to exploration and exploitation at company level.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!