17.08.2016 Views

RESPONSIBLE ENTREPRENEURSHIP VISION DEVELOPMENT AND ETHICS

2aO8o2F

2aO8o2F

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

148 <strong>RESPONSIBLE</strong> <strong>ENTREPRENEURSHIP</strong><br />

significant positive correlation (0.51***). This correlation exists employees cannot be motivated<br />

if they are not sure about their future in organization (Jandaghi et al., 2011).<br />

Focusing on Table III, it can be seen that leadership is positively correlated with empowerment<br />

(H17, 0.67***) and communication (H18, 0.58***). The strong positive correlation<br />

between leadership and empowerment signifies the fact that leaders are those who give employees<br />

autonomy to find new and creative solutions for work (Zhang and Bartol, 2010; Muñoz-<br />

Doyague and Nieto, 2012). This correlation with communication exists because leaders are<br />

responsible for the atmosphere within organization and its performance, whereas empowerment<br />

and communication are two motivational factors managed by leaders.<br />

Other positive correlations, which support previous findings conducted by Johnson and Yang<br />

(2010) and Battistelli et al. (2013) are between organizational loyalty, intrinsic motivation (H20,<br />

0.58***) and extrinsic motivation (H21, 0.41***). The first correlation indicates that employees<br />

feel the strong relationship between them and organization, which positively influence their<br />

internal desire to work for the company’s prosperity (Bloemer and Odekerken-Schröder, 2006).<br />

The second positive correlation exists because employees committed to their organization feel<br />

external support that affect their motivation (Battistelli et al., 2013).<br />

Concerning the recognition, it has positive significant correlation with organizational loyalty<br />

(H22, 0.59***) and extrinsic motivation (H23, 0.55***). According to Danish and Usman<br />

(2010) the first relationship exists because employees feel that all their performance are seen<br />

and appreciated by supervisors. Further, the second correlation shows that the appraisal<br />

received by employees for their performance influence external motivation (Abdullah and<br />

Wan, 2013).<br />

Extrinsic motivation has positive significant association with job engagement (H25,<br />

0.44***). This correlation exists because externally motivated employees feel that managers<br />

treat them fairly and all their results are recognized, influencing their engagement to the job<br />

(Dysvik et al. 2010).<br />

Finally, the intrinsic motivation is strongly related to job engagement (H27, 0.63***).<br />

Zhang and Bartol (2010) imply that internally motivated employees enjoy their tasks, and<br />

have internal willingness to perform them at the highest level.<br />

The basic objective of the research is to define which motivational factors have strongest<br />

contribution on employees performance, proving the relationship among dependent and independent<br />

variables through SPSS linear regression analysis.<br />

Table 5: Model Summary<br />

Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate<br />

1 ,568 a ,322 ,222 ,58911<br />

Predictors: Promotion opportunity, teamwork, sense of achievement, employees empowerment, job engagement.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!