08.09.2018 Views

India 2018

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

712 <strong>India</strong> <strong>2018</strong><br />

76. The Constitution (Seventy-sixth Amendment) Act, 1994—The policy of reservation of seats in<br />

educational institutions and reservation of appointments or posts in public services for Backward<br />

Classes, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes has had a long history in Tamilnadu dating back<br />

to the year 1921. The extent of reservation has been increased by the State Government from time<br />

to time, consistent with the needs of the majority of the people and it has now reached the level of<br />

69 per cent (18 per cent Scheduled Castes, one per cent Scheduled Tribes and 50 per cent Other<br />

Backward Classes).<br />

The Supreme Court in Indira Sawhney and others vs. Union of <strong>India</strong> and others (AIR, 1993<br />

SC 477) on 16th November 1992 ruled that the total reservations under Article 16(4) should not<br />

exceed 50 per cent.<br />

The Tamilnadu Government enacted a legislation, namely, Tamilnadu Backward Classes,<br />

Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Reservation of Seats in Educational Institution and of<br />

appointments or posts in the Services under the State) Bill, 1993 and forwarded it to the Government<br />

of <strong>India</strong> for consideration of the President of <strong>India</strong> in terms of Article 31-C of the Constitution. The<br />

Government of <strong>India</strong> supported the provision of the State legislation by giving the President’s<br />

assent to the Tamilnadu Bill. As a corollary to this decision, it was necessary that the Tamilnadu<br />

Act 45 of 1994 was brought within the purview of the Ninth Schedule to the Constitution so that it<br />

could get protection under Article 31B of the Constitution with regard to the judicial review.<br />

77. The Constitution (Seventy-seventh Amendment) Act, 1995—The Schedule Castes and the<br />

scheduled tribes have been enjoying the facility of reservation in promotion since 1955. The Supreme<br />

Court in its judgment dated 16th November 1992 in the case of Indira Sawhney and others vs.<br />

Union of <strong>India</strong> and others, however, observed that reservation of appointments or posts under<br />

Article 16(4) of the Constitution is confined to initial appointment and cannot extend to reservation<br />

in the matter of promotion. This ruling of the Supreme Court will adversely affect the interests of<br />

the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes. Since the representation of the Scheduled Castes<br />

and the Scheduled Tribes in services in the States have not reached the required level, it is necessary<br />

to continue the existing dispensation of providing reservation in promotion in the case of the<br />

Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes. In view of the commitment of the Government to<br />

protect the interests of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes, the Government have<br />

decided to continue the existing policy of reservation in promotion for the Scheduled Castes and<br />

the Scheduled Tribes. To carry out this, it was necessary to amend Article 16 of the Constitution by<br />

inserting a new clause (4A) in the said Article to provide for reservation in promotion for the<br />

Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes.<br />

78. The Constitution (Seventy-eighth Amendment) Act, 1995—Article 31B of the Constitution confers<br />

on the enactments included in the Ninth Schedule to the Constitution immunity from legal challenge<br />

on the ground that they violate the fundamental rights enshrined in Part III of the Constitution.<br />

The Schedule consists of list of laws enacted by various State Governments and Central Government<br />

which, inter alia, affect rights and interest in property including land.<br />

In the past, whenever, it was found that progressive legislation conceived in the interest of<br />

the public was imperilled by litigation, recourse was taken to the Ninth Schedule. Accordingly,<br />

several State enactments relating to land reforms and ceiling on agricultural land holdings have<br />

already been included in the Ninth Schedule. Since, the Government is committed to give<br />

importance to land reforms, it was decided to include land reform laws in the Ninth Schedule so<br />

that they are not challenged before the courts. The State Governments of Bihar, Karnataka, Kerala,<br />

Orissa, Rajasthan, Tamilnadu and West Bengal had suggested the inclusion of some of their Acts<br />

relating to land reforms in the Ninth Schedule.<br />

Since the amendment to Acts which are already placed in the Ninth Schedule are not<br />

automatically immunised from legal challenge, a number of amending Acts along with a few<br />

principal Acts have been included in the Ninth Schedule so as to ensure that implementation of<br />

these Acts is not adversely affected by litigation.<br />

79. The Constitution (Seventy-ninth Amendment) Act, 1999—By this Act the Government has<br />

extended the reservations of seats for the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes as well as for<br />

the Anglo-<strong>India</strong>ns in the House of the People and in the Legislative Assemblies of the States for<br />

another ten years.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!