12.07.2015 Views

Télécharger le texte intégral - ISPED-Enseignement à distance

Télécharger le texte intégral - ISPED-Enseignement à distance

Télécharger le texte intégral - ISPED-Enseignement à distance

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Annexes 201IntroductionIn spite of a vast literature on the subject, the effect of gender and education on the evolutionof cognitive performances with age remains controversial. Longitudinal studies of randomlyse<strong>le</strong>cted population-based samp<strong>le</strong>s of subjects is so far the best way to study theserelationships by the col<strong>le</strong>ction of repeated measures of psychometric tests over time [21, 30].This method allows to analyse both the baseline <strong>le</strong>vel and the evolution with age of thecognitive performances. However, even in these studies, multip<strong>le</strong> methodological prob<strong>le</strong>msinterfere with the statistical analysis and disturb the associations. The use of psychometrictests as surrogate markers of performances in several cognitive functions implies twodifficulties. First whatever the battery of psychometric tests used, each test only measuressome domains of cognition even when considered as a global test like the Mini Mental StateExamination (MMSE) [5], a composite score derived from a limited number of cognitiveoperations. Second, several studies have reported that the ability to perform the tests wasstrongly related to gender and education. Fema<strong>le</strong>s tended to have better performances thanma<strong>le</strong>s on tests involving an important verbal component such as verbal memory tests whi<strong>le</strong>ma<strong>le</strong>s were generally better than fema<strong>le</strong>s on tests requiring visuospatial informationprocessing [3, 15, 23, 29]. High educated subjects tended to perform better on a wide range oftests including the MMSE [14, 17, 27] and community-based studies strengthened this resultby showing that the effects of education on numerous tests scores remained significant afteradjusting for confounding factors such as age [4, 7, 18]. However, when considering testscores it is important to keep in mind their artificial nature and arbitrary meaning. Forinstance, education may influence test-taking behaviour, lower educated subjects having moredifficulty to deal with general as well as specific testing conditions. So, one could argue thatthe degradation of cognitive performances with age related to a low <strong>le</strong>vel of education ismediated by the differential ability in developing test-taking skills between high and low3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!